|
Originally Posted by Loki79
(Post 668193)
After I moved my signal hose to the 4th runner, the engine is using about 2l of fuel pr 10km. Could this be the reason? This is a massive increase from earlier, but I thought it was only due to the increase in pressure and lack of tuning at that part of my fuel table.
Originally Posted by Loki79
(Post 668193)
My mapping at the extra boost pressure is off, but even on cruising speed at ~0 psi she still drinks like a drunk englishman.
The English would argue that they are not always drunk, and the Irish would argue that they are a more fitting exemplary drunk and should have been chosen as your original example. |
Cruising speed at 0psi? Wheres ur vac/boost gauge connected? You should be at -15 to -10 tops at cruise.
2l per 10km = roughly 11 miles to the gallon, you should be at ~20miles/gallon for city and 28ish for highway only. ~20mpg=1.2l/10km |
I would just like to say that I am truly sorry if I offended any british citizens throughout the world.
She swallows like a $20 crack hoe. |
Ok, I have an 11psi spring taking WG signal from the compressor housing. The car makes 11psi or 184kpa (I think) from the signal at the manifold every time, like clock-work; will moving the WG signal to the cold side of the intercooler give me any increase in pressure? It sounds to me like it won't and like there is not a measurable pressure drop with the BEGi FMIC.
I have a huge BEGi FMIC, FYI. I'd like to pick up 1-2psi without jacking with a boost controller. |
You will pick up boost directly proportional to the pressure drop through the IC core.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 671970)
You will pick up boost directly proportional to the pressure drop through the IC core.
|
imo its something small like half to a little under 1 psi. I wouldn't bother esp since you're not tapering up top.
I dunno why you wont use an mbc. It will definitely help you broaden your torque curve to the left. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 671979)
imo its something small like half to a little under 1 psi. I wouldn't bother esp since you're not tapering up top.
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 671979)
I dunno why you wont use an mbc. It will definitely help you broaden your torque curve to the left.
http://i55.tinypic.com/2nb9jdl.jpg I can't find a boost controller with large enough ports. These wastegates act funny when you put the small vacuum lines on them, I need one with bigger barbs. Edit: It just dawned on me that I can probably get away with running a small vac line to the secondary chamber on the wasteage since it only needs to see ~2psi...but I'm not sure how much of a difference that line will make in regards to filling the large canister. |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 574757)
Well, I think that may be a myth.
Or at least, a half-truth. The real trouble with taking the boost reference from point C doesn't come into focus until we consider what happens when you are operating in boost, but at part-throttle. So, let's say you're climbing a hill in 4th, and you're getting into the throttle enough to hold a constant speed but not accelerate. You're seeing maybe 6 PSI at the manifold. Because the boost controller is referenced to point B, the turbo is in fact probably making 12 PSI at that point. Ok, so it's making a little bit of excess heat, and our efficiency is off a few tenths, but no harm done. But what if we had the boost controller referenced to point C? Well, the fact that you are using the throttle to modulate boost means that the manifold pressure is never actually going to reach the setpoint, however the boost controller isn't smart enough to realize this. (As I said before, they're loyal, but very simple-minded. Kind of like people from Minnesota.) So now we're in a state where the boost controller is trying like mad to get the manifold up to 12 PSI, and it's fighting against a throttle plate that's not going to let it happen. Thus, the effective boost target (as seen from points A and B) becomes infinite! http://img38.imagefra.me/img/img38/6...bm_b90cf1c.gif That's right, anthropomorphic chibi-Dan. Well, maybe not infinite per-se, but the wastegate is definitely not going to open voluntarily. The turbo is just going to fight as hard as it bloody well can to achieve a target it'll never reach, making all kinds of heat in the process and sucking down your VE worse than a brain slug. Is this actually going to break anything? Probably not immediately. But you are putting a lot of undue stress on things without getting much, if anything, in return. |
Dont most valves require at least 15hg.in vac? Even then your turbo would be fighting against the valve instead of simply opening up the wastegate creating much more efficient way out for the exhaust gasses.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by triple88a
(Post 688908)
Dont most valves require at least 15hg.in vac? Even then your turbo would be fighting against the valve instead of simply opening up the wastegate creating much more efficient way out for the exhaust gasses.
"Push type" valves do not require vacuum to open just a pressure differential > spring preload. Attachment 191047 I have the in and out swapped (input opposing signal line). "Pull type" valves solely open with vacuum http://www.evasivemotorsports.com/me...ov_racingb.jpg In a few weeks I plan on measuring the differential at part throttle in my Audi (I5, T3/T3, 034 SEMS) with the WG teed off of the DV line. |
Originally Posted by Mcstiff
(Post 688886)
Doesn't this totally ignore the function of a Diverter/Bypass valve? When the signal line from the manifold to the DV has less pressure than the charge air side of the DV it will vent; correct?
I don't think that it totally ignores this effect, though the degree to which it is quantifiable begs some thought. I'm thinking along two different and unrelated lines here: 1: Yes, the bypass valve operates via a pressure differential. The question, of course, is what magnitude of difference is required to open it? If we consider the the circumstances surrounding the conventional function of the valve (to bypass the compressor during a shift) at the exact instant of a shift, then we observe the following conditions: a: With the engine turning at high RPM against a closed throttle plate, manifold pressure falls to its lowest practical level. Looking back over some old datalogs, I see that my MAP after closing the throttle at load tends to fall to about 15 kPa, which is about 13 PSI below atmospheric. The point here is that at the moment of a shift, which is when we expect the bypass valve to open (and is the condition for which we adjust the valve to open) the differential between manifold pressure and pressure at the valve is at least 30 PSI, maybe a great deal more than that. (It would be interesting to datalog this.) b: At the same time, the compressor is flowing a large mass of air, and this air has considerable inertia, so we expect that pressure as measured at a point just before the throttle plate would tend to rise to a considerably higher measure than was present at steady-state boost prior to closing the throttle. How high? I honestly have no idea. 2x setpoint? 4x setpoint? So, in a best-case scenario, if we look at the bypass valve as a relief valve, the effective target compressor pressure is going to be double the actual target map, for a PR of at least 3, and maybe 4. Look at a compressor map for a GT2560 or 2871 and tell me what the compressor efficiency is at that point. 2: Assume that I'm totally wrong about everything above, and that the bypass valve somehow knows to vent at exactly 15 PSI above atmospheric. It's magic. Well, if the wastegate is referenced to manifold pressure, and manifold pressure is being artificially depressed below the wastegate pressure by holding the throttle partially closed, then while the magic bypass valve will in fact prevent pressure in the intake tract from rising above 15 PSI, it will be flowing a tremendous volume of air in order to do so. Again, look at the compressor map, and look at when happens when you double or triple the mass of air being flowed for a given PR. Either way, compressor efficiency tanks, and the fact that the turbine isn't being bypassed by the wastegate means that exhaust backpressure skyrockets. Heat, heat, and more heat. |
Good points. I am not so interested in right or wrong and the only reason this is in my head is because I teed off of my DV signal line at ~2am in order to get back on the road :D
I have a drill and the fitting to tap into my charge air lines so at this point I am just playing. I can tell you right now that the pressure delta required to vent is <7psi since that is my maximum boost. Log showing DV reactivity (the WG signal in this log is connected to the compressor). I'll be out of town next week so it will be a bit before I have anyway to log the delta between charge air and IM at part throttle. Unfortunately, I only have one MAP sensor that I can log. |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 688924)
That's an interesting question.
Snip Fuck Obama, I would have voted for you! |
Theres also the forge dump valves that are different than that and they SUCK. I get all kinds of boost surge at nice driving. Simply there isnt enough pressure to force the plastic valve open.
http://www.evilution.co.uk/smartengine/dv/piston.jpg |
I don't know which one you're using, but my forge is working flawlessly and I haven't had a single instance of surge even after swapping to the stiffer (5-15psi) spring.
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 691400)
I don't know which one you're using, but my forge is working flawlessly and I haven't had a single instance of surge even after swapping to the stiffer (5-15psi) spring.
http://www.pdukexhausts.co.uk/ekmps/...001%281%29.jpg The problem is the plastic valve is there to prevent air from flowing in in vac. However in my opinion the plastic valve spring is too strong. From what i can tell the big spring is what gets replaced with the stiffer ones for different boost levels however there is nothing mentioned about the small spring.. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by 05pearl
(Post 646196)
I am using a manual boost controller and can't hold peak psi - it drops like a rock, but not linearly - see attached 13.5psi peak line. I am going to try tapping the cold side piping as you suggest. Would the sharp drop and then slow taper after peak (shown in attached) be indicative of being solved by tapping the cold side, or is something else causing the problem - like too restrictive of a cat causing a weak actuator to blow open or similar?
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1315214323 I was wondering whether you managed to find a solution as I've got a very similar steep drop after 4k revs. |
Originally Posted by trashy
(Post 767787)
I was wondering whether you managed to find a solution as I've got a very similar steep drop after 4k revs.
|
4 Attachment(s)
eh wth since we're talking about this here i'll toss what i got.
See the small spring? This is my replacement, you can see very thin. That was my problem. The original was too strong so during low loads it would hold the bov down even if the heavy spring on the bottom is fully retracted so the air would have to force the small spring open. Was alright at full boost but at anything less i got surges. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1315239602 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1315239602 Here is what i did with the holes. Sound now is more of a husss than a whistle it originally made. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1315239602 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1315239602 The only time this bov leaks is while cruising at about 60-70kpa as the turbo is spooled just enough to force the little spring open and the big spring isnt fully closed yet. At wot there is no leaks since the big spring now shuts closed and forces the white plastic valve closed with its force. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands