Tuning using an AFPR
01-08-2015, 11:17 AM
#1
Newb
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 6
Total Cats: -1
Tuning using an AFPR
I have a 1992 Miata with a t28 turbo going to run about 7psi! I will be running e85 on a walbro 430LPH. I am on a budget and the car starts and drives fine from what I can tell... I have a wideband but am only gonna drive it for a few months so I dpnt want to spend $700 on a Plug and play piggyback! I know everyone says different ("buy Megasquirt").
My question is could I run an AFPR and change the timing 6 degrees while running e85?
My question is could I run an AFPR and change the timing 6 degrees while running e85?
Reply
-1
-1
01-08-2015, 11:30 AM
#2
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
The stock ECU is not going to play nice with E85 AT ALL. Save your shekels and get proper management and injectors.
or
Do what you want and blow your **** up, then later buy management, injectors and new engine.
or
Do what you want and blow your **** up, then later buy management, injectors and new engine.
Reply
0
0
01-08-2015, 12:03 PM
#4
Elite Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
The truth is that with E85, you may get away with it. I've tuned a car with stock ECU, slightly larger injectors, and an SAFC that ran great on E85. And we did not mess with base timing. That whole fuel system was setup for 91 octane gasoline. We logged knock and it just did not have any issues. No wideband because cheap so all we know is that we saw about .91V on the ghetto old narrowband 02 sensor. This was a 7.8:1 compression 2L at 18PSIG with a decent intercooler.
Keep in mind though we only made small tweaks with the SAFC, and let the larger injector put in significantly more fuel than stock. We are talking about going from stock 450CCs in this application to 550s. And we ran a Walbro 255HP. So a lot more fuel volume than stock, even though the ECU was running a mostly stock tune. And that application had a 1:1 rising FPR stock.
E85 is incredibly forgiving of AFR screw-ups because it runs very cool and does not detonate easily. Lots of E-wisdom online saying that you cant run it without a dedicated fuel system and that's just not true. I would bet you will not blow up given good boost control, good spark with proper plugs, and good cooling.
If this is a car you really don't care much about and just want to have some cheap fun, I say do it. And report back. The risk is that even with the cool burning properties of E85, you will just be too damned lean and either get spark knock (detonation) of get enough heat in the #4 to get pre-ignition, which you probably wont hear and will definitely kill power and your engine.
Keep in mind though we only made small tweaks with the SAFC, and let the larger injector put in significantly more fuel than stock. We are talking about going from stock 450CCs in this application to 550s. And we ran a Walbro 255HP. So a lot more fuel volume than stock, even though the ECU was running a mostly stock tune. And that application had a 1:1 rising FPR stock.
E85 is incredibly forgiving of AFR screw-ups because it runs very cool and does not detonate easily. Lots of E-wisdom online saying that you cant run it without a dedicated fuel system and that's just not true. I would bet you will not blow up given good boost control, good spark with proper plugs, and good cooling.
If this is a car you really don't care much about and just want to have some cheap fun, I say do it. And report back. The risk is that even with the cool burning properties of E85, you will just be too damned lean and either get spark knock (detonation) of get enough heat in the #4 to get pre-ignition, which you probably wont hear and will definitely kill power and your engine.
Reply
0
0
01-08-2015, 01:39 PM
#5
Newb
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 6
Total Cats: -1
The truth is that with E85, you may get away with it. I've tuned a car with stock ECU, slightly larger injectors, and an SAFC that ran great on E85. And we did not mess with base timing. That whole fuel system was setup for 91 octane gasoline. We logged knock and it just did not have any issues. No wideband because cheap so all we know is that we saw about .91V on the ghetto old narrowband 02 sensor. This was a 7.8:1 compression 2L at 18PSIG with a decent intercooler.
Keep in mind though we only made small tweaks with the SAFC, and let the larger injector put in significantly more fuel than stock. We are talking about going from stock 450CCs in this application to 550s. And we ran a Walbro 255HP. So a lot more fuel volume than stock, even though the ECU was running a mostly stock tune. And that application had a 1:1 rising FPR stock.
E85 is incredibly forgiving of AFR screw-ups because it runs very cool and does not detonate easily. Lots of E-wisdom online saying that you cant run it without a dedicated fuel system and that's just not true. I would bet you will not blow up given good boost control, good spark with proper plugs, and good cooling.
If this is a car you really don't care much about and just want to have some cheap fun, I say do it. And report back. The risk is that even with the cool burning properties of E85, you will just be too damned lean and either get spark knock (detonation) of get enough heat in the #4 to get pre-ignition, which you probably wont hear and will definitely kill power and your engine.
Keep in mind though we only made small tweaks with the SAFC, and let the larger injector put in significantly more fuel than stock. We are talking about going from stock 450CCs in this application to 550s. And we ran a Walbro 255HP. So a lot more fuel volume than stock, even though the ECU was running a mostly stock tune. And that application had a 1:1 rising FPR stock.
E85 is incredibly forgiving of AFR screw-ups because it runs very cool and does not detonate easily. Lots of E-wisdom online saying that you cant run it without a dedicated fuel system and that's just not true. I would bet you will not blow up given good boost control, good spark with proper plugs, and good cooling.
If this is a car you really don't care much about and just want to have some cheap fun, I say do it. And report back. The risk is that even with the cool burning properties of E85, you will just be too damned lean and either get spark knock (detonation) of get enough heat in the #4 to get pre-ignition, which you probably wont hear and will definitely kill power and your engine.
Reply
0
0
01-08-2015, 01:49 PM
#6
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,592
Obviously this isn't the same thing as flex-fuel capability, so it'll only ever be "correct" on actual 85% Ethanol fuel. Depending on what data you believe, the actual Ethanol concentration of fuel branded as E85 can be as low as 51% (Source, pages 5, 7).
I guess more than anything I'm curious as to why you'd want to undertake this project on a car that you have no intention of keeping.
Reply
1
1
01-08-2015, 01:59 PM
#8
Newb
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 6
Total Cats: -1
In theory, yes. Upsizing the injectors by a multiple of 1.47 will get you into the ballpark of correct operation for E85. For a 1.6 car, that'd be around 330 cc / min, presuming that the dynamic characteristics are identical to the stock injectors.
Obviously this isn't the same thing as flex-fuel capability, so it'll only ever be "correct" on actual 85% Ethanol fuel. Depending on what data you believe, the actual Ethanol concentration of fuel branded as E85 can be as low as 51% (Source, pages 5, 7).
I guess more than anything I'm curious as to why you'd want to undertake this project on a car that you have no intention of keeping.
Obviously this isn't the same thing as flex-fuel capability, so it'll only ever be "correct" on actual 85% Ethanol fuel. Depending on what data you believe, the actual Ethanol concentration of fuel branded as E85 can be as low as 51% (Source, pages 5, 7).
I guess more than anything I'm curious as to why you'd want to undertake this project on a car that you have no intention of keeping.
Reply
0
0
01-08-2015, 02:07 PM
#10
If there's no Option 3: Eat a gun, i'd have to go with the FIC6 if there were no other option.
Seems like the best way to spend some money to have no support on this forum after you attempt to install and tune it, because nobody here is using that.
I've never had much luck trading a car with a blown motor.
Reply
0
0
01-08-2015, 02:27 PM
#14
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
Reply
0
0
01-08-2015, 03:07 PM
#17
Elite Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
I have researched this into the ground literally for years. There are two* options that might make sense for anyone doing anything forced induction Miata*:
Super ghettochearged idea rising AFPR and mess with base timing.
MS of some kind.
One is super cheap fun, the other is super competent.
Everything theoretically 'in-between' actually isn't. Bandaids end up costing more than MS, with vastly inferior results. So you pay more for less performance and possibly a grenade engine. Which you could have gotten with the ideas already discussed.
* The only exceptions to this are full-on racers running something super trick who are very very particular about how they want to tune. Think 949 and other shop cars. The other is Califailia, where you are living with your neck under a bunch of jackbooted thugs and will be sent to the gulag for daring to make your engine run properly. So unless you live on the wrong coast and/or plan to tangle with Theseus, Bbundy or Crusher, ignore these exceptions.
Super ghettochearged idea rising AFPR and mess with base timing.
MS of some kind.
One is super cheap fun, the other is super competent.
Everything theoretically 'in-between' actually isn't. Bandaids end up costing more than MS, with vastly inferior results. So you pay more for less performance and possibly a grenade engine. Which you could have gotten with the ideas already discussed.
* The only exceptions to this are full-on racers running something super trick who are very very particular about how they want to tune. Think 949 and other shop cars. The other is Califailia, where you are living with your neck under a bunch of jackbooted thugs and will be sent to the gulag for daring to make your engine run properly. So unless you live on the wrong coast and/or plan to tangle with Theseus, Bbundy or Crusher, ignore these exceptions.
Reply
0
0
01-08-2015, 03:11 PM
#18
I was about to flame a newb for bumping a 2001 thread.
then I realized he's even worse than that.
then I lol'd. then I read some of the responses and lol'd some more.
OP - just turn the timing up to 99 and run an eggplant AFPR disk, you'll be fine.
Over the years I learned that the smart people do it right the 1st time. The dumb people do it wrong, then fix it later. Some are poor because they're too dumb to be rich. I guess not everyone is fit to have a fun, sorted, proper turbo miata.....There's gotta be the molsted tubs of crap driven by cletus and his stepbrother/wife.
then I realized he's even worse than that.
then I lol'd. then I read some of the responses and lol'd some more.
OP - just turn the timing up to 99 and run an eggplant AFPR disk, you'll be fine.
Over the years I learned that the smart people do it right the 1st time. The dumb people do it wrong, then fix it later. Some are poor because they're too dumb to be rich. I guess not everyone is fit to have a fun, sorted, proper turbo miata.....There's gotta be the molsted tubs of crap driven by cletus and his stepbrother/wife.
Reply
1
1
