EFR 6258 or GTX2867 twinscroll
I am currently trying to figure out which turbo I want to use for my build and would like to hear some thoughts from the more experienced people. My car is my DD and will see some autox and track days but relatively few. I am looking for a turbo that will get me to my horsepower goal (340 at the crank or 300whp) while remaining efficient and give me the best lowend power possible. So far it has come down to these two turbos, the GTX2867 or the EFR 6258.
Here are the compressor maps for each. https://www.miataturbo.net/picture.p...pictureid=2404 https://www.miataturbo.net/picture.p...pictureid=2403 According to my calculations (pls correct me if I am wrong) would place me just to the left of the center line in the third efficeincy island for the gtx and just to the right of the center line in the second efficeincy island for the EFR. So far the borg looks better and is cheaper however the GTX offers the option to go twinscroll but I am not certain how much better the spool would really be. If I were to go EFR I would just get a manifold from ABE and get my downpipe modified as well as new intercooler pipes. The internal wastegate should be fine. However with the gtx if I chose to go twinscroll the turbo would run me $300 more then the EFR then I would need 2 external waste gates, $550-$600, a twinscroll mani +$200 over normal and the other mods I mentioned. So my question is whether twinscroll would be $1,100 better or if I should just go with the EFR6258. Maybe there is a better turbo option that I haven't even though of currently. I am open to any suggestions. P.S. I have been learning a lot but still consider myself noob so sorry if any of this is incorrect. |
The 6258 will spool and respond SIGNIFICANTLY faster than a Garrett GTX2867. They are impossible to get right now, but I would wait for a 6258.
|
thanks for the quick response. I kind of figured this would be the answer which is kind of a relief considerign the massive cost difference between the two. How long do you think this shortage might last?
|
I make 200ft/lbs at 3k rpm with no spool helpers (VCIS not hooked up, stock head, stock cams, EBC configured to act as MBC)
https://www.miataturbo.net/showpost....&postcount=191 |
Very nice that is exactly what i was looking for and my setup will be very similar to yours when it is finished.
|
EFR6258 is also *SUPPOSED* to come in twin-scroll housing, but I don't think Borg Warner actually makes them yet.
http://www.speedforsale.com/nissangt...66p24hl1cs7qf7 |
6258. So much pwn in one package
|
I say you should go with the GTX2867, mostly so we have comparisons of how it does on the miata.
|
I think if the price difference wasn't so vast I might just do that but the more I think about it the EFR 6258 is gonna give me the kind of performance I am looking for and is proven. I would rather not spend the massive money for the GTX if in the end it might underperform the EFR6258 in everyway
|
I too say gtx so you can waste thousands on the garrett chra exchange progra
Just like all the other cool kids here |
Originally Posted by Faeflora
(Post 876220)
I too say gtx so you can waste thousands on the garrett chra exchange progra
Just like all the other cool kids here Edit. 99mx5 has taken his car out on track. He has 2 days so far, with one of them ending in a blown motor. |
I'm more than likely going to be swapping for out a GTX2867 while I wait on the motor build to finish... I'll be the guinea pig
|
Originally Posted by shuiend
(Post 876229)
You know I have yet to see one of you BW people take your car out on the track dog on it and see how well it does.
Edit. 99mx5 has taken his car out on track. He has 2 days so far, with one of them ending in a blown motor. |
Originally Posted by shuiend
(Post 876229)
99mx5 has taken his car out on track. He has 2 days so far, with one of them ending in a blown motor.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Faeflora
(Post 876236)
Yah i am sure bw turbo would blow. But. Rebuild kit is 150 and you can DIY. At least with airwerks.
except the EFR CHRA is hulk-sized. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1336683820 |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 876238)
I think this speaks well of the turbo and not so well of the motor :giggle:
|
i found this
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 876238)
I think this speaks well of the turbo and not so well of the motor :giggle:
|
Saw this on another thread. EFR in pink. Yellow gtx2867
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...3&d=1322003798 |
Originally Posted by aaronc7
(Post 876291)
Saw this on another thread. EFR in pink. Yellow gtx2867
...overlay compressor map pic... |
Its no secret: borgs really like higher pressures
|
NOte that efficiency changes more with flow and less with pressure ratio.
|
the thing that attracted me to the GTX was that it looks like it might be able to take you to 400whp territory while staying within 0.70 efficiency island. That and it would be a simple swap on my car with no mods to exhaust.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 876113)
The 6258 will spool and respond SIGNIFICANTLY faster than a Garrett GTX2867.
|
No data, just driving impressions. The 6258 that I drove reminded me of my old BP4W/2554R setup. Crazy, crazy responsive and awesome low-end and mid-range power. I've driven several 2860RS cars and they don't even compare to the way a 6258 drives, and the 2867 isn't going to spool or respond faster than a 2860RS.
Look at soviet's dyno plot - 200ft.lbs at 3000rpm and 250+ft.lbs at 3500rpm. Not even Paul's old car did that, and that was a 2560R car. The EFR6258s are torque monsters. |
I want my money back for EFR buttsecks, Andrew... :)
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 876113)
The 6258 will spool and respond SIGNIFICANTLY faster than a Garrett GTX2867. They are impossible to get right now, but I would wait for a 6258.
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 876383)
No data, just driving impressions. The 6258 that I drove reminded me of my old BP4W/2554R setup. Crazy, crazy responsive and awesome low-end and mid-range power. I've driven several 2860RS cars and they don't even compare to the way a 6258 drives, and the 2867 isn't going to spool or respond faster than a 2860RS.
Look at soviet's dyno plot - 200ft.lbs at 3000rpm and 250+ft.lbs at 3500rpm. Not even Paul's old car did that, and that was a 2560R car. The EFR6258s are torque monsters. |
2 Attachment(s)
My vote goes to the obvious choice......
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1348694509 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1348694509 |
Geoff, any chance of the twin scroll 6258, and if there is, any idea the differences in spool between it and the single scroll.
|
Based on my experience - the 6258 is crazy responsive in singlescroll T25 config compared to any of the traditional turbos we're used to. the small EFRs are an outstanding fit for turbo miatas, in fact one of bw's engineers ran a 6258/log manifold on his personal car and LOVED it, until he had to move across the planet and sell his car.
There will be more EFR housings released next year (2013) and SEMA will be the official announcement of what's coming. I do not yet know if twinscroll will help 6258s (there is a good chance much earlier spool would make you compressor limited at surge, but dont know the limit yet and it will be different for different engines). one nice option is you could purchase a singlescroll EFR and upgrade to the twinscroll housing in the future |
I think earlier spool would surge limit as well from playing with the match bot, but that would mean it requires less energy in the exhaust gas to spool which would theoretically decrease transient response time. Spool doesnt really concern me as long as I can hit my torque target by 3500-4k rpm, its transients that I want.
|
What I've wanted to see was the 6758 spool data with a twinscroll housing.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 876383)
No data, just driving impressions. The 6258 that I drove reminded me of my old BP4W/2554R setup. Crazy, crazy responsive and awesome low-end and mid-range power. I've driven several 2860RS cars and they don't even compare to the way a 6258 drives, and the 2867 isn't going to spool or respond faster than a 2860RS.
Look at soviet's dyno plot - 200ft.lbs at 3000rpm and 250+ft.lbs at 3500rpm. Not even Paul's old car did that, and that was a 2560R car. The EFR6258s are torque monsters. I am looking at a 2860RS compared to the 6258. Buying from Full Race, there is a $550 price difference between the two turbos. Is the 6258 that much better than the 2860RS? I am willing to spend the money if the value is there. This will be going on a 91 with a 1.8 swap. ECU to be sorted out, I am still in the early stages of planning at this time. I am clicking reply and completely expecting to get blasted. Thanks for any info. |
Yes totally worth $1000 more than a Garrett.
|
Thanks Leafy.
|
Originally Posted by blackdbl9NB
(Post 1293184)
I am looking at a 2860RS compared to the 6258. Buying from Full Race, there is a $550 price difference between the two turbos. Is the 6258 that much better than the 2860RS? I am willing to spend the money if the value is there.
Support our vendors! TSE is setup for preorder on their manifold + turbo - $2,000.00 Trackspeed EFR Turbo Manifold 1.8L T25 Internal WG for maximum spool, v-band is currently only in a larger A/R :party: |
EFR6258 gets a lot cheaper when you bundle it with our EFR-specific cast manifold. :)
|
Yeah I was looking at that. Its a hell of a deal. Thanks guys.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands