DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?
View Poll Results: Pick my turbo /best wet dream turbo
EFR 7163 Twin Scroll .80 A/R
14
35.90%
EFR 6758 Twin Scroll .80 A/R
17
43.59%
EFR 6758 Single Scroll .64 A/R
8
20.51%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

EFR 7163/6758 Twin Scroll or Single Scroll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2018, 03:14 PM
  #41  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

subaru stuff does not correlate well when compared to normal i4 engines.
that and the boost control isn't well setup there to compare with the TS making less boost everywhere after 3500rpm.

looking at that, I would say that if the boost levels were identical, the t4 Ts held power longer into the limiter. the number discrepancy is because of the boost differences among other things im sure. in the upper rpm's there is a difference of up to 5psi... that's pretty big.
shlammed is offline  
Old 08-16-2018, 03:31 PM
  #42  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Here's about as good of a comparo as I've personally seen demonstrating what I'm saying

SS vs TS
535 vs 504hp
557 vs 572tq
Whoa that's interesting. And that's a t25 0.85A/R against the 0.80A/R t4?
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 08-16-2018, 03:37 PM
  #43  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
subaru stuff does not correlate well when compared to normal i4 engines.
that and the boost control isn't well setup there to compare with the TS making less boost everywhere after 3500rpm.

looking at that, I would say that if the boost levels were identical, the t4 Ts held power longer into the limiter. the number discrepancy is because of the boost differences among other things im sure. in the upper rpm's there is a difference of up to 5psi... that's pretty big.
Let's see a plot of what you're talking about then?
Cause actual results data beats theory urry single time.
18psi is offline  
Old 08-16-2018, 03:46 PM
  #44  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Let's see a plot of what you're talking about then?
Cause actual results data beats theory urry single time.
I'm in for results. I still want to see results of a SS 7163 on a miata but even that seems to be lacking. This is all for science. I agree, real data and facts always beats conjecture. But no one wants to step up to the plate and share or prove the failure because of financial investment. At least for me, it's a manifold, downpipe and exhaust housing. Then convert back to the trusty rusty artech if it sucks.
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 08-16-2018, 04:27 PM
  #45  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Let's see a plot of what you're talking about then?
Cause actual results data beats theory urry single time.
I don't think that the comparison is necessarily bad for the turbo if you read into the details, but you quoted some power numbers suggesting that its loosing power because of the twin scroll.
differences in power are from different boost levels. tuned to the same boost level, your gaining both low and high end power in that comparison.

shlammed is offline  
Old 08-16-2018, 05:07 PM
  #46  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

You realize that both of those curves were pushed to their maximum power output right? meaning the reason it's dropping boost is cause it's choking up at the hotside. You can see that they both make the same boost in the midrange. I'm asking for plots cause I'm happy to be proven wrong, but so far you haven't proven me wrong at all and you have just theory with no actual testing results/data. I've seen this on other setups too, not just EFR. I also thoroughly experimented with exhaust back pressure on my current sti, and can tell you that even on the same turbo once it starts choking at the hotside, power drops and boost drops even at 100% BCS DC and there's nothing you can do about it.

If my findings are incorrect, let's see the data.

Last edited by 18psi; 08-16-2018 at 05:39 PM.
18psi is offline  
Old 08-16-2018, 05:35 PM
  #47  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

Let's set up a gofundme for miataturbo science!
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 10:01 AM
  #48  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
Let's set up a gofundme for miataturbo science!
yeah, lets get it going.
I will chip $20.


18, I know what your saying about it being choked... its a thing... having both turbos in hand, you would have a hard time telling me that the t4 would flow less than the t25. the only way i could see it loosing top end vs open scroll is the way it interacts with the turbine wheel itself and not because of the mass flow area.

Back to the welding table I go. I just finished a t4 TS top mount manifold for a 1.8 with 6258. i don't know that we will see it pushed to the absolute limits like psyber is doing, but i would love to hear that it is.
shlammed is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 10:24 AM
  #49  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

I feel like I've reached my glass ceiling for my build. I can't even comfortably take logs. When things are rebuilt, and buttoned up and broken in, I swear I'll fly Vlad out over a long weekend and rent a dyno lol
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 10:26 AM
  #50  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

would it be too much to ask for you to try and log manifold backpressure...like we have been chatting about on FB

Both on your existing and future manifold
shlammed is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 10:35 AM
  #51  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

What pressure transducer would I use? I have an EGT port I can sacrifice, but have no other bungs on the manifold. It's swaintech coated so I don't know how easy it'll be to weld another on
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 10:40 AM
  #52  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

is the EGT in the manifold? specifically the collector would be best and yeah, that will work fine. if its in one runner, that's not ideal because it will show more pulsing but will still work.

basically you want a few feet of copper tube, to reduce the heat to the transducer and then you run a pressure sensor with 2bar more than your boost pressure. It can be a psig type sensor since we are only working in positive pressure in the manifold. The AEM exhaust pressure kit uses their normal 100psig pressure transducer.


I will toss a pair of bungs onto the manifold to use for EGT/emap
shlammed is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 10:41 AM
  #53  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
matrussell122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,859
Total Cats: 516
Default

I think my manifold will have 2 egt bungs i dont remember. But for science we can put extra bungs for a pressure transducer if you guys want numbers.

Also at work we use only gems pressure transducers and they seem to work good.
matrussell122 is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 10:47 AM
  #54  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

Sadly mine is in runner 3. Matrussell, you are our only hope.
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 10:57 AM
  #55  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
Sadly mine is in runner 3. Matrussell, you are our only hope.
the pressure does equalize... but you need to smooth it quite heavily the further you get away from the collector. sometimes to the point that you need a physical canister to dampen the pulses.
shlammed is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 11:07 AM
  #56  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
I feel like I've reached my glass ceiling for my build. I can't even comfortably take logs. When things are rebuilt, and buttoned up and broken in, I swear I'll fly Vlad out over a long weekend and rent a dyno lol
I was going to say: when the time comes we can probably throw together a dyno tuning weekend and dial in your car as well as others in your area. whole lot less expensive when you have a group
Originally Posted by shlammed
having both turbos in hand, you would have a hard time telling me that the t4 would flow less than the t25. the only way i could see it loosing top end vs open scroll is the way it interacts with the turbine wheel itself and not because of the mass flow area.
.
that's exactly what I'm getting at. the inlet flange is just that: the inlet flange. restriction is usually not at the inlet flange, which is why (on most other cars aside from bp) up-sizing the hotside while retaining identical inlet still nets a good chunk of top end power.
18psi is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 11:18 AM
  #57  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

I would be game for a mass dyno tune. Ive got my own street tune pretty good, but dont have anyone local I would trust to work on it any further. I have a real problem with handing my tune over to random people who claim T00Ner
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 11:24 AM
  #58  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

@Shibby and I have discussed this before and he scouted a place out that rents the dyno out. IIRC MachV also rents theirs out; we'll just have to see what works for where people are located. We can just get it hobbling along via remote tune, set a date that works for everyone buy a first class ticket for Vlad, and go ham.

I'm no vender so not sure about how to set this up and gather interest. Whatever works for Vlad Re: family/work schedule. I'm flexible aside trying to hit MATG2019
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 11:35 AM
  #59  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Shibby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Posts: 229
Total Cats: 39
Default

I'll check with the shop on logistics. The dyno is in Hagerstown, MD. I could house a couple of you non-local guys for a weekend.

I'd bet my place is cheaper than Mach v and probably has way more availability.

Dyno & Tune Reservations ? Hub City Performance

Last edited by Shibby; 08-17-2018 at 11:52 AM.
Shibby is offline  
Old 08-17-2018, 11:50 AM
  #60  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
I was going to say: when the time comes we can probably throw together a dyno tuning weekend and dial in your car as well as others in your area. whole lot less expensive when you have a group
that's exactly what I'm getting at. the inlet flange is just that: the inlet flange. restriction is usually not at the inlet flange, which is why (on most other cars aside from bp) up-sizing the hotside while retaining identical inlet still nets a good chunk of top end power.
understood.

The t4 has a larger a/r as well.. so I still think it would flow at least just as well...
especially so on an engine that is 25% smaller than the one being compared.
shlammed is offline  


Quick Reply: EFR 7163/6758 Twin Scroll or Single Scroll



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.