Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

I am NO mechanic but...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 08:00 AM
  #1  
LaplacesDemon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 7
Total Cats: -9
Default I am NO mechanic but...

I've been reading up on superchargers vs turbo. I find that sc will get you off the front line faster. And turbo is better at the high end but not as good as sc on the low end.

Has anyone ever tried to combine both? A sc to get you going that switches over to a turbo once you're up to speed?

That might be a stupid question. I'm just learning.
Reply
Leave a poscat -4 Leave a negcat
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 08:02 AM
  #2  
thirdgen's Avatar
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,029
Total Cats: 304
From: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Default

Mad max...know what I'm sayin?
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 09:09 AM
  #3  
LaplacesDemon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 7
Total Cats: -9
Default

Umm... no. What are you sayin?
Reply
Leave a poscat -2 Leave a negcat
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 09:18 AM
  #4  
supercooper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,112
Total Cats: 35
From: Pennsylvania
Default

duuuuuuude..... Mad Max is the Schit....
I need to swtch my shizzle on like that...
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 09:49 AM
  #5  
BrilloHeadBen's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 42
Total Cats: 10
Default

The concept of Twincharging has been around for ~30 years now. VW seems to be a big fan of it too. IMO, the extra cost and complexity is no where near worth it. If you need big power up top and as little lag as possible, I would think an anti-lag system would be easier.

Twincharger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 10:06 AM
  #6  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Hybrid FTW!!!

Nothing produces torque down low better than an electric motor. Just ask the railroads. I recommend you focus on modding Priuses. Maybe a twin-turbo LS to supplement the electric motor once you're higher in the rev range.

And, if you want to add a SC like Mad Max, heck, mo' better!

Nothing says you can't also add a nuclear reactor. The Air Force did it on their NB-36 back in the '50s. Just watch out for UN sanctions.
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 10:21 AM
  #7  
LaplacesDemon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 7
Total Cats: -9
Default

Anybody got a spare flux capacitor laying around? Them things are FAST!

Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 10:26 AM
  #8  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Now you're talking!!
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 10:42 AM
  #9  
LaplacesDemon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 7
Total Cats: -9
Default

Originally Posted by BrilloHeadBen
The concept of Twincharging has been around for ~30 years now. VW seems to be a big fan of it too. IMO, the extra cost and complexity is no where near worth it. If you need big power up top and as little lag as possible, I would think an anti-lag system would be easier.

Twincharger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thanks for the link. So then, yes, it has been done. Your link goes on to say:

Twincharging's largest benefit over anti-lag systems in race cars is its reliability. Anti-lag systems work in one of two ways: by running very rich AFR and pumping air into the exhaust to ignite the extra fuel in the exhaust manifold; or by severely retarding ignition timing to cause the combustion event to continue well after the exhaust valve has opened. Both methods involve combustion in the exhaust manifold to keep the turbine spinning, and the heat from this will shorten the life of the turbine greatly.
It also mentioned nitrous which led me to this interesting fact:

The gas is approved for use as a food additive (also known as E942), specifically as an aerosol spray propellant. Its most common uses in this context are in aerosol whipped cream canisters, cooking sprays, and as an inert gas used to displace oxygen, to inhibit bacterial growth, when filling packages of potato chips and other similar snack foods.
So take a deep whiff next time you open a bag of potato chips. Maybe you can catch a buzz!

Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 11:21 AM
  #10  
supercooper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,112
Total Cats: 35
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by LaplacesDemon
Anybody got a spare flux capacitor laying around? Them things are FAST!
not as fast as you would think.... they only had to go 88mph before the flux capacitor would initiate time travel...
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 04:30 PM
  #11  
LaplacesDemon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 7
Total Cats: -9
Default

Originally Posted by supercooper
not as fast as you would think.... they only had to go 88mph before the flux capacitor would initiate time travel...
Yeah but going from 88 to time travel is like the Star Ship Enterprise going from impulse to warp I. In order to break the time barrier (backward) you have to exceed the speed of light. Although its theoretically possible to leave the time dimension at one point and reenter it at another by going through an alternate dimension. But that would probably require a wormhole and there's never one around when you need it.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 05:33 PM
  #12  
supercooper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,112
Total Cats: 35
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by LaplacesDemon
Yeah but going from 88 to time travel is like the Star Ship Enterprise going from impulse to warp I. In order to break the time barrier (backward) you have to exceed the speed of light. Although its theoretically possible to leave the time dimension at one point and reenter it at another by going through an alternate dimension. But that would probably require a wormhole and there's never one around when you need it.
Damn.... so why the hell do you have to go 88mph before it will travel??? lol
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 05:35 PM
  #13  
foxyroadster's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 163
Total Cats: -7
Default

I considered a setup using a toyota SC14 (it has a clutch like an ac compressor) I have spare and a larger turbo, but decided it was way too much effort and just got a decent size turbo lol
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 07:37 PM
  #14  
LaplacesDemon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 7
Total Cats: -9
Default

Originally Posted by supercooper
Damn.... so why the hell do you have to go 88mph before it will travel??? lol
Take the 88 and lay the numbers on their sides. What do you have?

DOUBLE INFINITY! Know what I'm sayin?

Attached Thumbnails I am NO mechanic but...-infinity-symbol.jpg   I am NO mechanic but...-infinity.jpg  
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 08:27 PM
  #15  
albumleaf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,151
Total Cats: 92
Default

smoke weed every day thanks obama
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EricJ
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
7
Sep 11, 2021 11:10 PM
interestedofold
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
Sep 29, 2015 01:42 PM
Squiblez
Build Threads
2
Sep 22, 2015 10:17 AM
b&t
Meet and Greet
3
Sep 22, 2015 09:32 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM.