Intercooler!
Not to beat a dead horse (couldnt find a similar thread) but I am trying to figure out a intercooler setup.
Car will be autox'd, mostly street. Has a gt2554r. I am looking at the Fab9 IC, a Frozenboost liquid to air IC kit, and the CXRacing. I want good performance, but is spending the extra for the Fab9 worth it on these engines with that small of a turbo? Ive never done a liquid to air, but Ive been considering it if for nothing else than the cool factor... Are they worth the headache? Ive seen a few L/A setups on here |
What level of boost will you be running. That 2554 will be a blow dryer (read lots of hot air) at anything over 12 or so psi.
Mt.net answer, get a precision core IC :) |
Trackspeed 350hp Intercooler
I did a lot of IC testing developing this one. The Precision core is a big step above the Vibrant (Fab9) or CXRacing cores. Air/water setups are done for packaging reasons almost exclusively. We don't have the packaging constraints that would require a W/A setup. |
Buy the Trackspeed unit and be done with it.
|
http://https://www.ebay.com/p/Univer...83410352&rt=nc
You will need to weld mounts. 2”’inlet and outlet is convenient. Seriously, I have used this IC with great results with very long uphill pulls in the 175 HP range. Less than 20 Degrees F over ambient. |
The Precision will be noticeably better? I can pay the $400 if it will be, but $260 with brackets is easier to swallow from Fab9, put a lot of money into my car this month :dunno:
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1481964)
Trackspeed 350hp Intercooler
I did a lot of IC testing developing this one. The Precision core is a big step above the Vibrant (Fab9) or CXRacing cores. Air/water setups are done for packaging reasons almost exclusively. We don't have the packaging constraints that would require a W/A setup. |
Originally Posted by 503
(Post 1481976)
The Precision will be noticeably better? I can pay the $400 if it will be, but $260 with brackets is easier to swallow from Fab9, put a lot of money into my car this month :dunno:
|
Anything with a Precision core.
|
Hey lol, never turbocharged anything before this is a learning experience
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1481980)
:facepalm:
|
Nothing wrong with that. start reading
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1481992)
Nothing wrong with that. start reading
|
It just needs to be a precision core.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1481964)
Trackspeed 350hp Intercooler
I did a lot of IC testing developing this one. The Precision core is a big step above the Vibrant (Fab9) or CXRacing cores. Air/water setups are done for packaging reasons almost exclusively. We don't have the packaging constraints that would require a W/A setup. |
Treadstone TR6 should be good. |
2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by 503
(Post 1481976)
The Precision will be noticeably better? I can pay the $400 if it will be, but $260 with brackets is easier to swallow from Fab9, put a lot of money into my car this month :dunno:
Originally Posted by Joker
(Post 1482014)
Sav - Whats the weight for this IC?
Originally Posted by yossi126
(Post 1482032)
Treadstone TR6 should be good. 10 seconds on the science of heat exchangers: Turbulent air will transfer heat much better than smooth air (laminar flow). Anything you can do to disrupt the airflow as it passes through the core will increase the amount of heat that you can pull from that air. Google for more info beyond that. One of the things that good intercooler cores have is louvered internal fins. These louvers disrupt the airflow through the core substantially, which increases heat transfer. No pic of the Vibrant (Fab9) core from me, but AFAIK it has no fins or louvers inside. Treadstone core. Very open, no louvers at all. The core is not straight through, it offsets every 10mm or so, but that's a cheap half-measure. It's also how Treadstone (a fairly small company) can build an intercooler that competes on price with Precision (a much bigger company). We actually use a lot of Treadstone stuff in our turbo kits (DP clamps, flex bellows, silicone IC couplers), but their IC cores were a little disappointing. Not awful, just not as good as they could be. Treadstone 18x12 raw core: Attachment 228869 Precision core. Tons of louvers here. The inlet is centered on the core so there's also no need for an air divider like Treadstone uses. Precision 350hp assembled core: Attachment 228870 Every time I'm at SEMA or PRI I make a point of looking at everyone's intercooler cores. Garrett makes the nicest stuff, but you pay for it. Precision is a close second at less than half the price. Hence our decision to build around their core. |
supposedly the newer larger vibrants have proper turbulator placement, but I've yet to see one in person
|
If you can get the precision cooler do so. I have the CX Racing IC and just looking at the pics the precision has it beat. Looking at the data it's no contest. CX Racing IC is amazing for the price because it is so cheap. It's adequate for a street build or low power build that's all though... adequate.
|
Originally Posted by 90LowNSlo
(Post 1482115)
CX Racing IC is amazing for the price because it is so cheap.
|
There are ebay cores with the louvers out there. I have one in my car. You have to trawl for one with pictures that show the core, and then hope you don't get sent something different. The build quality is meh though. But I am ok with the trade off for price/performance since I am not building a car that is pushing any limits.
|
After all this discussion, he still went with Fab9.
|
Originally Posted by acedeuce802
(Post 1482263)
After all this discussion, he still went with Fab9.
|
|
that's the fab9?
they definitely improved it if it is |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1482406)
that's the fab9?
they definitely improved it if it is |
Mine looks like that too and I bought mine used off chilicharger and he bought it from Bryan before Fab9 was a thing.
Edit: I was wrong. Found an old picture I took of my IC. Guess they did up their game! https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...2548c2fbac.jpg |
You're implying that they're all like that. They're not
https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo...rcooler-83205/ I've looked into many of them in person. None had staggered fins like above (which is much better). I guess they finally updated them. I also bought many before fab9 was a thing. |
Yeah, I updated my post. I found an old picture I took. Good on them for catching up! Pity TSE didn't have one of these suckers when I was looking.
This is the post you're referring to, right Vlad? https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo...5/#post1210336 |
by up game, you mean buy a better chinacooler?
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1482416)
by up game, you mean buy a better chinacooler?
|
Sheesh - all the mod love. They updated our stage 2 intercooler cores over a year ago. We didn’t advertise any improvements. As of a couple months ago the smaller core has been improved. All units moving forward are the improved design, thats certain. |
I remember the day deezums found that $50 cooler on ebay that somehow magically had proper fin density and placement, I hit "buy it now" so fast I felt like one of the n00bs
|
Originally Posted by FAB
(Post 1482421)
Sheesh - all the mod love. They updated our stage 2 intercooler cores over a year ago. We didn’t advertise any improvements. As of a couple months ago the smaller core has been improved. All units moving forward are the improved design, thats certain. |
Originally Posted by FAB
(Post 1482421)
Sheesh - all the mod love. They updated our stage 2 intercooler cores over a year ago. We didn’t advertise any improvements. As of a couple months ago the smaller core has been improved. All units moving forward are the improved design, thats certain. https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo...5/#post1210348 Have any of your test cars or users swapped over to the new stage 1 from the old one? Curious what difference it made for IATs! |
1 Attachment(s)
So, thinking I was satisfied with the better of the 2 CXRay I/Cs, such as what I had, I bought another one after my wreck. P/N IC0049.
Now the conversation about Vibrants and Precisions is making me second guess. For the track, I only plan to run about 175 WHP, and I will only be seeing about 10* rise over ambient. Not sure how much pressure drop, however. And for street use, I only get about 20* rise, as not enough time to heat soak. Big question is if I indeed take car to drag strip as planned, that will be a long enough pull at 220WHP, or so, to let MAT go high. I could just throw in a couple of gallons of 110 or 120 Octane race gas, to keep safe, but will still loose some power, I would expect. TBH, I think the pressure drop will be more of an issue than MAT. I have attached a log that represents the old and new intercooler on a pull. Do you think I should ditch this thing and go for a Vibrant (Fab9) or Precision? My set-up will never make more than 250WHP. Log with 2-3 flat-shift (same as loaded log): https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...66b9c50714.png |
Fully heat soaked, I never want to see more than a 30-35*F delta between ambient and IATs post-intercooler.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1482441)
Fully heat soaked, I never want to see more than a 30-35*F delta between ambient and IATs post-intercooler.
|
Originally Posted by DNMakinson
(Post 1482478)
That’s what I’m gathering. I may be heat soaked, in that if I held the power the MAT might get to that. However, in this log, MAT goes from 79 ambient to 99, or only 20 degrees F. Hence the question.
79 on that log is not going to be ambient. That's referring to the actual air temperature outside of the car not MAT during low load. |
I understand. However, I have found them to be equivalent within a very small margin. Have you found it otherwise?
|
Originally Posted by 503
(Post 1482400)
|
Installing my intercooler as I'm typing this, actually... Good density and placement and it feels pretty solid
|
I meant to cover this earlier, I snapped some current inventory photos of what we're working with here.
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/950/4...55db8900_z.jpg NC Intercooler Core https://farm1.staticflickr.com/973/4...e3a42a28_z.jpg Stage 1 Core https://farm1.staticflickr.com/882/4...0f0f36da_z.jpg Stage 2 Core https://farm1.staticflickr.com/945/4...d7e18d11_z.jpg |
Yea, the vibrant core I bought last year from vibrant had a dense turbulator count just like that. Seems to be a really good option now.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands