Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?
View Poll Results: BOV location
Cold side before TB
84.44%
Hot side near turbo
15.56%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

New BOV location

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 08:33 PM
  #21  
miataspeed2005's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,404
Total Cats: 0
From: Connect-I-Cut
Default

This is the hot side at the end of that there's a 180 deg pipe not pictured
Name:  cd6096b7.jpg
Views: 113
Size:  61.5 KB
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 08:34 PM
  #22  
Corky Bell's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 271
Total Cats: 11
From: Texas Hill Country
Default

I don't think there is a clear advantage either way, but the valve ought to be at one end or the other.

If a recirc, after the IC lightens the heat load very slightly. But, the work to push thru the IC is also very slightly greater thus the turbo would lose rpm quicker. Damn little.

My preference is at the TB end and it is, as stated earlier, to keep air heading one direction, and the IC a tick less drained.

Note that modern OEM's are now building it into the compressor housing. I hope Porsche doesn't succum to that approach.

Corky
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #23  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
as long as the compressor wheel is spinning it is moving air.
as long as the engine is on, the compressor wheel is spinning.

The only time I could POSSIBLY see the bov actually sucking in air is for that SPLIT SECOND when you stab the throttle and the car gulps in more air than is already moving through the system and the bov hasn't shut yet. We're talking less than a second worth of "sucking" time.
The compressor wheel is spinning, but youre totally neglecting that the engine is still drawing in air. What makes you think that the compressor is ALWAYS pushing more air than the engine is taking in?

But anyway, even if it is a rare occurrence, which I agree that it probably is, it still could happen, and if your BOV is 2 inches from the ground you could possibly suck something up.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 08:43 PM
  #24  
Sparetire's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
From: Colorado
Default

OP, that location looks great to me, I would put it anywhere in that reigon where its out of the way.

Edit: Hey how vague can I be I am refering to the coldside piping that you hit with the marker. One thing thats nice about that point is that you can do a piece of straight pipe there and thus have some real variability in the direction of the BOV, You can rotate the pipe to keep it out of the way and all.

Last edited by Sparetire; Mar 21, 2010 at 08:53 PM.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 08:47 PM
  #25  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
The compressor wheel is spinning, but youre totally neglecting that the engine is still drawing in air. What makes you think that the compressor is ALWAYS pushing more air than the engine is taking in?

But anyway, even if it is a rare occurrence, which I agree that it probably is, it still could happen, and if your BOV is 2 inches from the ground you could possibly suck something up.
not really. I've put my hand up to the bov on my car as well as many others while idling, and while revving, and while stabbing the throttle suddenly, each time it was exactly the same: at idle it was pushing out air, at slow revs it was pushing out air, at stabbing it would close super fast but before that it would be pushing out air. There was not one single time where I could get it to suck in air. And I TRIED to get it to do that.

That's just my experience though. Maybe some cars actually do suck in air through the bov. I don't know
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 08:49 PM
  #26  
Reverend Greg's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 350
Total Cats: -26
From: McDonough Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by Corky Bell
I don't think there is a clear advantage either way, but the valve ought to be at one end or the other.

If a recirc, after the IC lightens the heat load very slightly. But, the work to push thru the IC is also very slightly greater thus the turbo would lose rpm quicker. Damn little.

My preference is at the TB end and it is, as stated earlier, to keep air heading one direction, and the IC a tick less drained.

Note that modern OEM's are now building it into the compressor housing. I hope Porsche doesn't succum to that approach.

Corky
I think the Lord thy God Has spoken and may it be so...Im putting mine about 3" away from the Throttle Body for the as above stated reasons.
(G)
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 09:09 PM
  #27  
dustinb's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,321
Total Cats: 14
From: Victoria, BC
Default

Originally Posted by Sparetire
Under idle/light cruise conditions there is probably a bit of vacuum in the ic plumbing. Small, but a bit. How could the BOV then have air going out? That would be a major PITA for tuning with any MAF based EMS, as it would basically cause the car to run rich all the time.
lol, you said MAF based EMS.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #28  
dustinb's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,321
Total Cats: 14
From: Victoria, BC
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
not really. I've put my hand up to the bov on my car as well as many others while idling, and while revving, and while stabbing the throttle suddenly, each time it was exactly the same: at idle it was pushing out air, at slow revs it was pushing out air, at stabbing it would close super fast but before that it would be pushing out air. There was not one single time where I could get it to suck in air. And I TRIED to get it to do that.

That's just my experience though. Maybe some cars actually do suck in air through the bov. I don't know
Mine's always letting out air unless there's positive pressure in the manifold to keep it closed.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 09:14 PM
  #29  
miataspeed2005's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,404
Total Cats: 0
From: Connect-I-Cut
Default

Mine used to let air out at idle untill I tighten the adjustable spring
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 09:29 PM
  #30  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

+1 on above - wherever it is easiest to place.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 09:32 PM
  #31  
astroboy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

Just make sure your not going to have clearance problems with your diverter and cooling fans/radiator. My old setup had the diverter pressed against the cooling fan, it was a major pita to install and uninstall.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 09:47 PM
  #32  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Sparetire
This.

Pressure is pressure. The time difference in reducing it at the TB or the compressor housing from a 'cold-side' to 'hot-side' placement is miniscule and insignificant unlkess you have such a large volume at such high density that the BOV is not large enough to really effectively release it. I doubt anybody here is anywhere near that point.

So put it out of the way. If it were me, with most of the setups I have seen, near the IC outlet would be a great bet.
I agree, but pressure is going to "stay" on one side of the intercooler longer, and I'd rather vent at the turbo-side of the piping because it dumps air more efficiently for the turbo and may help it free-wheel...but I think the advantage will be miniscule.

Anyone that tells you "compressor surge" off the throttle is a problem is a certified moron and you should not believe anything else they say.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 09:53 PM
  #33  
dingo7's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 28
Total Cats: 0
From: Jackson Ga.
Default

weld it to the intercooler, i didnt try it on my evo but some people i knew had the setup on their evos, ams did it on many of their cars. just a thought
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 10:28 PM
  #34  
rweatherford's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 332
Total Cats: 1
From: Shelbina, MO (North East)
Default

Pressure is pressure, but mass and velocity can co-exist in separate conditions under the same pressure. If boost is vented to atm near the TB then the turbo stays spooled and probably increases RPM. All air post compressor to BOV keeps it's velocity. Then when TB is opened the only air that has to start moving (still under pressure) is from the BOV to the TB, not compressor, IC, piping and TB. If this was not important why to we even bother with "tuned" intake manifolds?

My
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 11:16 PM
  #35  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by dingo7
weld it to the intercooler, i didnt try it on my evo but some people i knew had the setup on their evos, ams did it on many of their cars. just a thought
This isn't club fagster: we don't do **** to be "different".
Originally Posted by rweatherford
Pressure is pressure, but mass and velocity can co-exist in separate conditions under the same pressure. If boost is vented to atm near the TB then the turbo stays spooled and probably increases RPM. All air post compressor to BOV keeps it's velocity. Then when TB is opened the only air that has to start moving (still under pressure) is from the BOV to the TB, not compressor, IC, piping and TB. If this was not important why to we even bother with "tuned" intake manifolds?

My
Makes sense. So you're saying coldside bov placement is better, right?
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 11:40 PM
  #36  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Seriously you guys are overthinking this one, and this is coming from an R&D Engineer who tends to overthink everything. Just place it where it is easiest.

I had my BOV on the hot side of the IC. Then when I switched to a Tial Q (big, like my *****) it would not fit on the hot side. So, I moved it to the cold side. All else was the same, and I did not notice a difference. Really, no big deal.

And welding it to the IC tank is not a bad idea if it is convenient. Why not? I considered it because it is a naturally good location clearance-wise for a v-mount setup when placed on the 'inside' of the V.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 11:45 PM
  #37  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

As long as it isnt like this, youre cool.

Name:  IMG_0343.jpg
Views: 128
Size:  96.5 KB
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 11:47 PM
  #38  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I think best location would be on the exhaust manifold
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 12:00 AM
  #39  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

I think the best location would be in my butt
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 09:39 PM
  #40  
dingo7's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 28
Total Cats: 0
From: Jackson Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
This isn't club fagster: we don't do **** to be "different".
seems to me like thats not true b/c you have a person asking where he should place his bov. If yall didnt do **** to be "different" he would be putting the ******* valve where every other person places their valve. Come to think of it the thread wouldnt even be here.

The bov on the intercooler has a purpose. The only difference is there are not any miatas running 40-50psi.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM.