Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Proposed setup in technicolor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 06:22 PM
  #1  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default Proposed setup in technicolor

just want to make sure I am doing it the rite way in round two and figured I would make and post this to double check whilst I wait for my piping and ic to come in. The only thing I am not sure about is should the iat sensor be on the intercooler or the piping after the intercooler and before the diverter?

Old Mar 9, 2010 | 06:29 PM
  #2  
Jeff_Ciesielski's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,770
Total Cats: 31
From: Rhode Island
Default

Switch the boost gauge and the MS feed. Getting your MAP sensor signal from right after the throttle body tends to be problematic because the air is very turbulent there and will cause your tune to be screwy. Actually most people tend to tee off of the FPR for the MS. Looks good otherwise.
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 06:34 PM
  #3  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

Sweet, thanks for the advice!
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 11:01 PM
  #4  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

I forgot to put the line for the diverter...that comes off the same pipe as the mbcv/diverter.
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 11:26 PM
  #5  
dustinb's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,321
Total Cats: 14
From: Victoria, BC
Default

Originally Posted by astroboy
I forgot to put the line for the diverter...that comes off the same pipe as the mbcv/diverter.
The diverter needs to be run after the throttle body, not before. Also IAT sensor needs to be after the intercooler.
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 11:33 PM
  #6  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

Yeah, what I said doesn't actually make sense...and the iat I was planning on putting into the end tank on the cold side of the ic, but I could put it in the piping also. Really want to make sure it will be cooled by the air to avoid heat soak.
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 11:41 PM
  #7  
TurboRoach's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 488
Total Cats: 3
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Default

I would move the mbcv line to near the compressor outlet.
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 11:42 PM
  #8  
dustinb's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,321
Total Cats: 14
From: Victoria, BC
Default

Originally Posted by astroboy
Yeah, what I said doesn't actually make sense...and the iat I was planning on putting into the end tank on the cold side of the ic, but I could put it in the piping also. Really want to make sure it will be cooled by the air to avoid heat soak.
Heatsoak really shouldn't be an issue on the charge pipe side. I think you definitely want it to be an accurate representation of the air going into the throttle body, so I was put it about half way or closer up the cold side charge pipe.
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 06:31 AM
  #9  
levnubhin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
From: Va Beach
Default

T the MS line in with the FRP line, you'll have much less noise there. And then T the boost gauge line off of that one inside the cabin, makes for easier and less hose routing.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 09:36 AM
  #10  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

Sweetness, I am sooooo glad I made this thread. Thanks alot for the recommendations!
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 09:44 AM
  #11  
slutz4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 566
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by levnubhin
T the MS line in with the FRP line, you'll have much less noise there. And then T the boost gauge line off of that one inside the cabin, makes for easier and less hose routing.
x2 thats exactly what I did
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 11:07 AM
  #12  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

Would it matter which port I take the signal for the diverter off of? I think no but I am not positive.
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 11:10 AM
  #13  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

not really no.

just tee the MS to the FPR, then tee the boost gauge off that inside the cabin.
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 11:47 AM
  #14  
Jeff_Ciesielski's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,770
Total Cats: 31
From: Rhode Island
Default

Just for reference, this is how mine is laid out (Not a current pic, but the important bits haven't changed)

Old Mar 10, 2010 | 12:39 PM
  #15  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

Looks great, I will probably run the line from the tee into the car and under the dash I will tee once again for the boost meter and megasquirt. Is there any benefit to having a filter on each line or could you just have 1 filter after the tee off of the fpr? I feel the latter is the better but would like someone elses input.
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 12:48 PM
  #16  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by TurboRoach
I would move the mbcv line to near the compressor outlet.
I wouldn't.

If you do this, then boost will decrease as RPM increases. The reason is that pressure drop across the IC is a function of the mass flow per unit time through it. The more air you pass through the IC, the more pressure you lose across it.

If your MBC is referenced to pressure before the IC, then pressure after it will decrease correspondingly. By placing the MBC takeoff after the intercooler (but before the throttle) then the system will maintain a constant pressure after the IC by gradually raising pressure before it to compensate for this drop.
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 01:08 PM
  #17  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

^agree
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #18  
TurboRoach's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 488
Total Cats: 3
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I wouldn't.

If you do this, then boost will decrease as RPM increases. The reason is that pressure drop across the IC is a function of the mass flow per unit time through it. The more air you pass through the IC, the more pressure you lose across it.

If your MBC is referenced to pressure before the IC, then pressure after it will decrease correspondingly. By placing the MBC takeoff after the intercooler (but before the throttle) then the system will maintain a constant pressure after the IC by gradually raising pressure before it to compensate for this drop.
Oh, I thought having it close was better for keeping the pressure steady. I guess I'll move mine.
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 05:40 PM
  #19  
astroboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default



So this is what I am going with, there will be one filter on the red line coming off of the fpr. Thanks again to everybody who helped aim me in the rite direction!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
mx592
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
1
Oct 1, 2015 12:45 AM
Joe Perez
Current Events, News, Politics
8
Sep 30, 2015 04:41 PM
JesseTheNoob
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
Sep 30, 2015 02:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 AM.