Rear Turbo Setup
20 Attachment(s)
Hi Everyone, First post here on MiataTurbo and would like to say hi. Hope you enjoy the post and pics.
So here's the Parts list: Comp Turbo, Water Cooled Ceramic Bearings, no oil. MSPNP Pro Here's a huge suggestion, make sure you lengthen the wires that are given to you by DIY Autotune so you can have easier hookup from the extra terminals in the back. Do the same with the vacuum line, put about 18" on it and run a barbed coupler to connect the one going through the firewall to the engine. If your afraid of it blowing off with boost super glue it. Don't put the super glue in the vacuum tube just on the barbed ends and slide them on, they won't come off. Tial waste gate Turbosmart BOV. Custom charge pipe by me, I have a bender. Custom exhaust, I have mig and tig. GM IAT sender. MS electronic boost controller Extra GM 3 bar map sensor for exhaust back pressure reading. Have not taken any readings yet. LM1 wideband setup. 2" tubing Lots of good turbo hose clamps |
I don't hate you for your car or turbo placement decision, I hate you for dropping that kilo brick of words on me while expecting me to keep track. All I get is rear turbo from the first, and don't hate from the end.
dafuq. Learn2paragraph. |
Originally Posted by deezums
(Post 1292731)
I don't hate you for your car or turbo placement decision, I hate you for dropping that kilo brick of words on me while expecting me to keep track. All I get is rear turbo from the first, and don't hate from the end.
dafuq. Learn2paragraph. |
Does it spool like donkey dick?
Awesome fab |
Originally Posted by aidandj
(Post 1292741)
Does it spool like donkey dick?
Awesome fab |
Positive pressure? Or high boost.
What size turbo? Built engine? |
Stock engine, 5 psi now until I get very familiar with tuning. Then injectors and 8 to 10 Psi.
Just finished it the other day so I'm taking it slow and easy. |
No I mean is 3000rpm when you get positive pressure or 5psi?
|
Positive pressure
|
Hmm. Interested in spool logs.
|
Me too.
|
Originally Posted by Roadstercycle
(Post 1292752)
Me too.
|
Clever setup and nice clean fab. It'd definitely confuse folks when you pop the hood, but really, why? Is it just to be different?
|
Why do you have the MAF still installed.
|
This is awesome and I just can't fault you for doing something different and unique. My only wonder is how the spool and pressure drop is going to be considering how far the air has to go. Especially since the charge air is travelling a couple inches away from the hot exhaust. Still a badass setup imo
|
great location to install eletrical components. smh...
where's the oil pump? |
Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
(Post 1292824)
Clever setup and nice clean fab. It'd definitely confuse folks when you pop the hood, but really, why? Is it just to be different?
|
Originally Posted by Roadstercycle
(Post 1292836)
I live in California and wanted a quick easy removal-able setup. I can put it back stock in a couple hours for smog or just for doing weekend racing. Throw it on Friday and go racing. It's quick and easy.
I had my turbo, manifold, DP, and IC removed within 20 minutes when I took mine off... |
Originally Posted by aidandj
(Post 1292829)
Why do you have the MAF still installed.
|
Originally Posted by Roadstercycle
(Post 1292838)
The MAF is not installed or does the top stock intake hose do anything except hide the pressure tube coming up to the throttle body. It just looks stock. Again California stealth mode.
|
I like it. Something different.
I wonder what the volume of your cold side plumbing is. With all that cold underbody airflow there might not be need for an intercooler even at higher boost levels. In for spool data and IATs. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1292835)
great location to install eletrical components. smh...
where's the oil pump? |
intersting.
i still dont like the idea of running wires and electircal components to a remote location instead of just vacuum line. like the map sensor... you shoudl be taking the reading off the intake mainfold, no idea why'd youd put it as far away form that as possible. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1292839)
what happens when a cop notices how loud and riduclous your car sounds and looks to see if youve added an aftermarket exhaust?
|
Originally Posted by cyotani
(Post 1292844)
I like it. Something different.
I wonder what the volume of your cold side plumbing is. With all that cold underbody airflow there might not be need for an intercooler even at higher boost levels. In for spool data and IATs. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1292849)
intersting.
i still dont like the idea of running wires and electircal components to a remote location instead of just vacuum line. like the map sensor... you shoudl be taking the reading off the intake mainfold, no idea why'd youd put it as far away form that as possible. It's not the MAP for the intake, It's the MAP for the exhaust pressure. |
Originally Posted by Roadstercycle
(Post 1292850)
Dear Braineack, I was hesitant to even post my car on this site because of all the grief and hassle I've seen you give other people because they don't conform to your standards or opinions. I built the first FRS rear turbo car on the planet a few years ago and got a lot of grief then. I know what I have and you can't change that, if you have nothing nice to say why say anything? Some people are interested in the setup and your not so move on or just follow along.
and I dont just say nice things (that's what your mommy and liberal art tecahers are for) and people shouldn't expect others to hand out compliments. grow some fucking balls pussy. do you need to find a safe zone? :) I'm not even giving you grief, just some shit. |
Originally Posted by Roadstercycle
(Post 1292852)
It's not the MAP for the intake, It's the MAP for the exhaust pressure.
|
Dude, he's just giving you some honest feedback and asking questions that are worth thinking about.
He's not being particularly hard on you... yet. |
I have learned that this forum is the most "trial by fire" place on the internet. You will get torn up at first, but for those that make it past the grief, it is an amazing place to be at with great insight and knowledge.
|
Originally Posted by Roadstercycle
(Post 1292851)
The IAT @ 5 PSI was about 125 degrees. I will probably go 8 psi and we'll see what happens. It may need a cooler.
How does the longevity of an water only turbo compare to a oil and water turbo? any plans to switch to an oiled setup down the road? |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1292854)
ah gotcha. What's the purpose of that?
|
Originally Posted by cyotani
(Post 1292858)
What was ambient? Temp over ambient is more relevant.
How does the longevity of an water only turbo compare to a oil and water turbo? any plans to switch to an oiled setup down the road? I really don't want the oil pump nightmare, the water cooling is pretty clean setup. |
Man, don't be so sensitive. Awesome build, loved the STS remote mount stuff for the C5. I thought that was always an awesome way to keep temps manageable and with modern turbos you can still get decent spool characteristics out of remote mount stuff. You should post some of your logs and let people pick them apart. Don't let your ego be hurt by it, it's just the internet. Lots of great information in all the skepticism here.
|
I like this because it's different. But like others, I question whether this has any benefits compared to a normal mounting location.
Also, as you already stated that you were aware of, sometimes people offer some "tough love" here. If you knew you were going to get it, then buck up and take it. At least you're not JDM corvette guy. |
I'd been trying to remember the name of the manufacturer that made the oil-less turbos. I've heard about them once or twice, but no first-hand experience.
The relatively high boost threshold, I suppose, is to be expected given the bearing configuration. I'll be extremely curious to follow the progress of this car and see how it holds up over time. Welcome aboard. Looks very nice under the hood. I have a special fondness for sleepers. |
Originally Posted by 90civichhb
(Post 1292862)
Man, don't be so sensitive. Awesome build, loved the STS remote mount stuff for the C5. I thought that was always an awesome way to keep temps manageable and with modern turbos you can still get decent spool characteristics out of remote mount stuff. You should post some of your logs and let people pick them apart. Don't let your ego be hurt by it, it's just the internet. Lots of great information in all the skepticism here.
|
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 1292865)
I'd been trying to remember the name of the manufacturer that made the oil-less turbos. I've heard about them once or twice, but no first-hand experience.
The relatively high boost threshold, I suppose, is to be expected given the bearing configuration. I'll be extremely curious to follow the progress of this car and see how it holds up over time. Welcome aboard. Looks very nice under the hood. I have a special fondness for sleepers. Comp Turbo in California. |
Originally Posted by Roadstercycle
(Post 1292869)
Brain is a sharp guy.
|
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 1292865)
I'd been trying to remember the name of the manufacturer that made the oil-less turbos. I've heard about them once or twice, but no first-hand experience.
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1292835)
where's the oil pump?
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1292854)
ah gotcha. What's the purpose of that?
Originally Posted by Roadstercycle
(Post 1292729)
So here's the Parts list:
Comp Turbo, Water Cooled Ceramic Bearings, no oil. Extra GM 3 bar map sensor for exhaust back pressure reading. Have not taken any readings yet.
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1292835)
where's the oil pump?
|
There are a few guys running rear turbos on festivas. Most of them are just using an inline electric fuel pump designed for carburetors (8psi) on the oil return. The current 1/4 miles record holder is running that setup on a bp swap.
|
Originally Posted by Itty
(Post 1292864)
At least you're not JDM corvette guy.
|
bro, i dont read.
|
Never would have guessed.
|
Looks like some really nice clean fab work. Interested to see how it performs.
|
125 ait with 80 amb I'd say yes, you need a cooler
It's pretty cool, I've actually considered something like this for NaziFornia, but too lazy to go through all the trouble for mediocre power |
Atleast provide us with an exhaust video... I wanna hear how this thing sounds!
|
It's a water cooled muffler officer.
|
meh, unless your car looks all stancetarded and blatantly modified, I don't see him getting a hood pop or underbelly check from a cop.
He's clearly put some effort into this too, so I'm sure he has the brain power to keep the car looking stock on the outside too |
This would be cool to run with E85 to eliminate the need for an intercooler. I feel like the whole idea of this kit is simplicity, which leaving the intercooler out would satisfy.
I'm curious about it's mounting. Is it hung from the exhaust hangers? I can see some rod going to an exhaust hanger on the right side of the pictures, but can't tell how it's actually mounted. |
e85 doesn't eliminate the need for a cooler.
neither does w/I. |
Originally Posted by acedeuce802
(Post 1292937)
This would be cool to run with E85 to eliminate the need for an intercooler. I feel like the whole idea of this kit is simplicity, which leaving the intercooler out would satisfy.
I'm curious about it's mounting. Is it hung from the exhaust hangers? I can see some rod going to an exhaust hanger on the right side of the pictures, but can't tell how it's actually mounted. |
Originally Posted by aidandj
(Post 1292930)
It's a water cooled muffler officer.
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1292935)
meh, unless your car looks all stancetarded and blatantly modified, I don't see him getting a hood pop or underbelly check from a cop.
He's clearly put some effort into this too, so I'm sure he has the brain power to keep the car looking stock on the outside too |
Roadstercycle, are you by any chance related to the roadstercycle reverser box for motorcycles?
If so, preparef or a bombardment of questions |
What size turbo
|
Cool man.
That turbo needs a muffler shaped heat shield. |
Originally Posted by glade
(Post 1292967)
Roadstercycle, are you by any chance related to the roadstercycle reverser box for motorcycles?
If so, preparef or a bombardment of questions |
Something you will learn soon is that threads get out of control here very quickly, and get taken over.
|
Originally Posted by aidandj
(Post 1292987)
What size turbo
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands