Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   DIY Turbo Discussion (https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo-discussion-14/)
-   -   should i turbo: NA or NB (https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo-discussion-14/should-i-turbo-na-nb-8179/)

savior 03-14-2007 01:54 AM

should i turbo: NA or NB
 
Which should i turbo? I can get either car

Does one have more aftermarket support than the other?
Is one more "compatable" with turbos than the other?
Which would be cheaper to turbo?
How sexy am i?

akaryrye 03-14-2007 02:00 AM

If you can get it as a second car, i would vote for an early NA for just a few reasons. First, they are cheap. Second, its more simple and OBD1. Third, its got Pop up Headlights ftw.

cjernigan 03-14-2007 02:13 AM

'94 model i think is a pretty good way to go. Someone once told me it was the easiest/ideal car to use. Still OBD-I unless I'm mistaken and has the 1.8 motor. Can't go wrong with that combination.

I love my NB though and would do it this way again if I had the choice.

akaryrye 03-14-2007 02:17 AM

94-95 with torsen, ya thats probably the best year but can be hard to find. 95 does not have the real oil pressure gauge though FTMFL

cjernigan 03-14-2007 02:44 AM


Originally Posted by akaryrye (Post 92262)
95 does not have the real oil pressure gauge though FTMFL

I just modded my '99 OPG and am using the 0-100 VDO sending unit. Works awesome. $30 later and about an hour of work including assembly and disassembly.

TheBandit 03-14-2007 02:46 AM

Damn Mazda for not giving the base model a Torsen! :td:
-Michael-

akaryrye 03-14-2007 11:06 AM

Ya I have a feeling that theres quite a few miata owners out there (on miata.net mainly) who believe they have a torsen but really do not. When i was first into miatas and browsing there i was led to believe that nearly every 2nd gen NA had it .. wrong.

Braineack 03-14-2007 11:09 AM

94 ftw

magnamx-5 03-14-2007 11:15 AM

nah 1.6 man you know you want a nice 1.6 1.8 isnt nearly as fun. :rofl:

miatamania 03-14-2007 11:30 AM

I'd be inclined to agree w/ magna...but then you have to worry about the damn rear end and stuff...I'd get a 94-95. more money to spend on turbo stuff than a NB :D

Al Hounos 03-14-2007 11:54 AM

I love the looks and weight and tough engine of NA, but lately I've been having some NB envy in the chassis/suspension department.

ak47bravo 03-14-2007 11:56 AM

94 woot

getsidewaysd1 03-14-2007 11:59 AM

As said above, 94-95 FTW. I wish thats the route I would have gone.

greddymx5 03-14-2007 03:03 PM

The 94-95.5 also have a slightly lowe compression ratio..(8.8) as from 95.5-97 they have (9.0), 99-00 (9.4), 01-05 (10:1) mazdaspeed not included

94 models came oem with a torsen (in us, not in europe)
Youll need the bigger 1.8 rear diff when going turbo...
The 1.8 came with oem braces (behind the seats and @ the diff)

P90Puma 03-14-2007 04:14 PM

94's UNITE!

Edit: Above me poster is wrong. All 94's came with torsens EXCEPT the base model. Which I own, screw powersteering and all the extras.

Braineack 03-14-2007 04:16 PM


Originally Posted by magnamx-5 (Post 92343)
nah 1.6 man you know you want a nice 1.6 1.8 isnt nearly as fun. :rofl:


yeah once you up the brakes, diff., clutch, bracing & displacement :p

greddymx5 03-14-2007 06:38 PM

O,sorry I was told several times that all 94 models have torsens....Guess i was wrong...

miatamania 03-14-2007 07:01 PM


Originally Posted by getsidewaysd1 (Post 92358)
As said above, 94-95 FTW. I wish thats the route I would have gone.

I know right...we've almost practically converted the cars to that year anyway :(


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands