2002 NBB BEGi S4 GT2860RS Adaptronic 310hp 290tq DYNO
2 Attachment(s)
Just finished up with some Dyno tuning. On a Mustang Dyno @18-19 PSI the car produced 310hp and 290tq without methanol. I'm happy with those numbers but I believe the turbo had run out of flow. The dyno used is notoriously 15-20% low so I'm happy with the numbers. Especially off meth!
I'll tune for meth next week and hopefully pick up another 20-25whp. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1327330030 http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/324/nonamejj.jpg https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1327330030 Mustang Dyno @18-19 PSI the car produced 310hp and 290tq without methanol ADAPTRONIC (Map Attached) AFR 11.5-11.8 EGT peaked at 1500F Boost Peak 19 tapering down to 17 PSI Flat foot shifting setup properly Launch control setup and enabled Car's drivability is completely different. Power hits hard but is smooth power and holds it for much longer. I'm extremely happy with the tune off of meth and cant wait to tune with it. Given the fact that this dyno is notoriously low and my drive train percentage loss estimated on the minimal end, we're looking at 360 at the crank. Limited at this time by the turbo. For you ADAPTRONIC guys - My map is attached. Tuner said he LOVED working with the WARI software. |
.64AR turbine housing?
That's a very, very, very fast car. 12psi on that turbo with the big turbine housing is fast, I've only driven it at 16psi a few times and it was faster than I ever needed a car to be. |
do you have more pictures of your engine bay?
|
I sitll cant believe there's not a viable solution for an IM for our cars...rediculous.
|
Originally Posted by lub
(Post 826151)
do you have more pictures of your engine bay?
|
Nice to see you back. You have a very clean car. I'm mermalade.
|
derp, my bad. Still, sweet numbers...that car would scare me.
|
Originally Posted by lub
(Post 826174)
derp, my bad. Still, sweet numbers...that car would scare me.
Very nice numbers. What trans and rear/gears are you running? |
Damn that looks like fun. Such a clean car, too. What are you expecting with the methanol power wise?
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 826152)
I sitll cant believe there's not a viable solution for an IM for our cars...rediculous.
|
I WANT
Would you mind posting a screenshot of your spark table? |
2 Attachment(s)
|
Very nice looking spark table, and as said previously: great results.
Did the tuner hit MBT running 18* @ 19psi? That's definitely up there from the norm pump gas maps. I know some on here run insane timing but not most. |
Assuming 19 psi at peak torque of 290 ft-lbs, is 70 ft-lbs per atmo per L.
That's only about 3% below my numbers on a Dynapack. So I'll guess that this Mustang dyno doesn't read as famously low as other Mustangs - probably closer to a Dynapack / Dyno Dynamics. Hustler, Looking at his spoolup, I'll guess it's a 0.86 a/r. Look at the RPM he hits 150 and 175 ft-lbs compared to yours. If he has a 0.64 my guess is he's losing spoolup due to untuned VVT. |
Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
(Post 826270)
Assuming 19 psi at peak torque of 290 ft-lbs, is 70 ft-lbs per atmo per L.
That's only about 3% below my numbers on a Dynapack. So I'll guess that this Mustang dyno doesn't read as famously low as other Mustangs - probably closer to a Dynapack / Dyno Dynamics. Hustler, Looking at his spoolup, I'll guess it's a 0.86 a/r. Look at the RPM he hits 150 and 175 ft-lbs compared to yours. If he has a 0.64 my guess is he's losing spoolup due to untuned VVT. |
Originally Posted by thirdgen
(Post 826177)
It wouldn't scare me. I would be way too fulfilled with extreme happiness and satisfaction to have any room for fear.
|
Originally Posted by lub
(Post 826151)
do you have more pictures of your engine bay?
|
I couldn't find in your build thread if you're running a 0.64 or 0.86.
|
If I remember correctly it's the .64 housing.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands