Notices

N/A na6 quarter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #1  
zoomzoom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 109
Total Cats: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
Default N/A na6 quarter

Just thought I may aswell put something up. I had a mate going to the track today so I tagged along and took mine for a run.

Anyways it ran a 15.509 quarter at 85.24 mph, I had a couple more runs but boggd one and spun first the other but both had better mph, 89.32 and 89.41. I might see if i can scan the sheet in sometime.

Its a 1600 with 265deg cams, 2.5" exhaust with dodgy ebay headers, 4:3 torsen and 6speed box. Engine is unopened except for cams and is up to 225000km (about 140K miles)

It ran 16.7 stocker with just exhaust and cai so I am pretty happy with the improvements so far, I just can't wait to get the hairdrier on it now. Hopefully it shouldn't be more than a few months away when I can get around to making a manifold and get a cooler etc.

Tim
Old May 2, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #2  
Mach929's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,494
Total Cats: 0
From: lansdale PA
Default

maybe try megasquirt, i think with flat shift, launch control, and tuning you've got 14s
Old May 2, 2008 | 08:49 PM
  #3  
mrtonyg's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 483
Total Cats: -2
From: South Florida
Default

Not bad for n/a.
Old May 3, 2008 | 05:10 AM
  #4  
zoomzoom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 109
Total Cats: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Mach929
maybe try megasquirt, i think with flat shift, launch control, and tuning you've got 14s
Yes that is with all of the above. I only got 3 runs in so I didn't get a real good launch but the first wasnt too bad apart from heaps of wheel hop. I think there may still be a little in it but not 14's IMO.

Considering it ran 16.7 before and I havn't done much for power yet I dont think it ran too bad.

Tim

P.S. I only realised after I prob should have put this in the DIY section, it was so late the other night when I put it here.
Old May 3, 2008 | 05:32 AM
  #5  
mike_671's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 786
Total Cats: 0
From: Guam (U.S Terr.)
Default

That makes me sad. becuase i hit 15.4 (check sig) and i have a turbo. But thats a good time for N/A
Old May 3, 2008 | 07:55 AM
  #6  
Mach929's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,494
Total Cats: 0
From: lansdale PA
Default

oops didn't realize you already have all that. but still, your best run was at 85mph and you've trapped 89, which should get you close

Originally Posted by zoomzoom
Yes that is with all of the above. I only got 3 runs in so I didn't get a real good launch but the first wasnt too bad apart from heaps of wheel hop. I think there may still be a little in it but not 14's IMO.

Considering it ran 16.7 before and I havn't done much for power yet I dont think it ran too bad.

Tim

P.S. I only realised after I prob should have put this in the DIY section, it was so late the other night when I put it here.
Old May 3, 2008 | 08:01 AM
  #7  
zoomzoom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 109
Total Cats: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
Default

Interesting to note Mach, I guess there must be a little more in it if the best time still had a lower trap speed.

Another interesing note was the 2 runs with higher trap speed were when I bogged(after I short shifted to secnd to stop the spinning) so if I could avoid the wheel hop at the start I might get a little better. I didn't think of it at the time, but my KYBs are on full soft, maybe if I tried stiffening them a little to dampen the spring oscillations it may help?
Old May 3, 2008 | 09:42 AM
  #8  
slutz4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 566
Total Cats: 2
Default

thats pretty fast for a na6 naturally aspirated
Old May 6, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #9  
UrbanSoot's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,667
Total Cats: 18
From: Woodland Hills, CA
Default

/me wants to get cams now
Old May 6, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #10  
UrbanSoot's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,667
Total Cats: 18
From: Woodland Hills, CA
Default

which cams did you use? im drooling to get some obx 264 degrees cams now
Old May 6, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #11  
zoomzoom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 109
Total Cats: 0
From: Brisbane, Australia
Default

They are from a company here in Australia called Crow Cams. I don't know the full details of them since I picked them up second hand and havn't got around to calling crow for the full grind specs, but they are 265 degree in and ex.

The only problem I have had with them is that I have found it imposible to get the car to idle. Aswell as the cams I have an NB inlet mani and iac which seems a real bitch to control. Even on steady DC(warmup only mode) I have to have it idling around 1500-2000 rpm to stop it from huntung, thats with a pretty consistant 13:1 afr and flat spark table all around idle.
Old May 6, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #12  
ApexOnYou's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,274
Total Cats: 0
From: South Eastern Wisconsin
Default

Nice times man. Thats two tenths faster than I ran when modded non turbo on a 1.8.
Old Sep 13, 2008, 12:58 AM
This message has been deleted by Quality Control Bot. Reason: SPAM
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tekel
Cars for sale/trade
29
Feb 5, 2016 04:16 PM
Corifto
Miata parts for sale/trade
8
Oct 4, 2015 04:30 PM
Andifer
Miata parts for sale/trade
8
Sep 23, 2015 05:43 PM
TheNomad
Engine Performance
3
Sep 21, 2015 10:20 PM
2000SE
ECUs and Tuning
5
Sep 8, 2015 11:30 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 AM.