Notices
ECUs and Tuning Discuss Engine Management, Tuning, & Programming

UEGO nightmare

Old Nov 12, 2016 | 09:27 PM
  #1  
Odell89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 136
Total Cats: -53
From: Bristol, Tennessee
Default UEGO nightmare

It has been 2 weeks and I still cannot get my WB working correctly. 1.6, MSpnp2, AEM UEGO. I have ran power from the fusebox, and the battery. I have read numerous accounts of people with conflicting stories on grounds, so I'm asking you all.. I have ran grounds from the radio area, the trunk battery ground, the battery it's self, and to the engine and engine bay, I have NOT ran it to the ECU sensor ground, yet.. Wanting experienced opinions, I keep getting erratic readings and full lean readings, it isn't the tune, The sensor tested good (gas/rag) test.. Any help appreciated, this is becoming a mini-hell.
Old Nov 13, 2016 | 01:04 AM
  #2  
DanBrown's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 103
Total Cats: 3
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Might be a dumb question, but you have calibrated it in TS, correct?
Old Nov 13, 2016 | 11:05 AM
  #3  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Are you getting these readings from the gauge, in tunerstudio, or both?

log of erratic readings?
Old Nov 13, 2016 | 01:06 PM
  #4  
Odell89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 136
Total Cats: -53
From: Bristol, Tennessee
Default

I'm getting it in TS, and on the afr.. But the car seems to run fine through all of this. I will get a log later today and post it if I have time, and yes it is calibrated in TS
Old Nov 13, 2016 | 01:36 PM
  #5  
hi_im_sean's Avatar
SadFab CEO
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,560
Total Cats: 1,143
From: your mom's house phoenix, AZ
Default

Sounds like you just have a bad gauge. Good grounds, bad gorunds... there is always an offset you'll have to account for, but it will be consistent, not erratic as you describe.
Old Nov 13, 2016 | 02:09 PM
  #6  
Odell89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 136
Total Cats: -53
From: Bristol, Tennessee
Default

The plot thickens. I had the gauge working correctly, after fighting with it just as I'm doing now.. The alternator went bad, so I replaced it and the battery (it was needed too) and wired the ground to the battery just as it was before replacing, and I'm back to square one with it, erratic readings.
Old Nov 13, 2016 | 06:49 PM
  #7  
Odell89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 136
Total Cats: -53
From: Bristol, Tennessee
Default

Now grounded to ECU sensor ground, power from fusebox.
At idle: will idle at 12-13 afr for an unpredictable amount of time; and them go to 18.3 and stay
Under load: unpredictable, sometimes gets dead on readings, others it's just full lean.
Old Nov 14, 2016 | 01:19 AM
  #8  
DanBrown's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 103
Total Cats: 3
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Odell89
Now grounded to ECU sensor ground, power from fusebox.
At idle: will idle at 12-13 afr for an unpredictable amount of time; and them go to 18.3 and stay
Under load: unpredictable, sometimes gets dead on readings, others it's just full lean.
O2 bung in exhaust is solid too? No chance of it wiggling around or reading extra oxygen i.e. exhaust leak?

Just crossing things off at this point ha.
Old Nov 14, 2016 | 09:37 AM
  #9  
Odell89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 136
Total Cats: -53
From: Bristol, Tennessee
Default

Yessir, I've been there too, I did find a leak about 4 inches after the o2 bung, and thought "woohoo", fixed it, caught the happies thinking it was finished, it was 12:40am, and 37° outside.. Started the car, and it read correctly (14.1-14.7) for about 90 seconds and then BAM, afr's bouncing from the 12's to full leans at idle.
Old Nov 14, 2016 | 10:06 AM
  #10  
DanBrown's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 103
Total Cats: 3
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Hmmm, it has to be a bad gauge then.
Or bad connections going into the back of the gauge, maybe there is play there and it causes it to read strange.
Other than that, I'm out of ideas.
Old Nov 14, 2016 | 10:23 AM
  #11  
Odell89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 136
Total Cats: -53
From: Bristol, Tennessee
Default

I totally appreciate the input though, I'm considering just replacing all of it instead of just the gauge, it's so frustrating!!
Old Nov 14, 2016 | 04:20 PM
  #12  
DanBrown's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 103
Total Cats: 3
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Odell89
I totally appreciate the input though, I'm considering just replacing all of it instead of just the gauge, it's so frustrating!!
haha no problem, I tried. I think I saw a aem wideband on the sale thread. Might want to check it out
Old Nov 14, 2016 | 04:57 PM
  #13  
Odell89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 136
Total Cats: -53
From: Bristol, Tennessee
Default

Here's a question for others using megasquirt.. In fuel settings, I think it's under "injection type" or something of that nature, it is set to "4g63".. Anyone else running MS on a 1.6 NA, and have a different setting on this?
Old Nov 14, 2016 | 05:08 PM
  #14  
hi_im_sean's Avatar
SadFab CEO
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,560
Total Cats: 1,143
From: your mom's house phoenix, AZ
Default

That would be the ignition trigger type, not injection. And yes that is correct for a 1.6 using a CAS.
Old Nov 15, 2016 | 02:09 AM
  #15  
Odell89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 136
Total Cats: -53
From: Bristol, Tennessee
Default

Well, I think I've figured out my problem.. I tested the sensor AGAIN.. This time it tested bad, in the towel it stayed and full rich for about 8 seconds and then shot to lean.. Tested 4 times with the same result. 4100 gauge with 4.2 sensor, and I can't seem to find one that is an exact match, I've found some that you have to cut the connector off and splice the old one on to.. Nah, so I ordered a whole new UEGO a few minutes ago, I bought the one I have now secondhand, I will let everyone know the results when it comes in. I appreciate all for the help, I'm just unsure why it tested fine the first time. Oh well.
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 08:18 AM
  #16  
hi_im_sean's Avatar
SadFab CEO
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,560
Total Cats: 1,143
From: your mom's house phoenix, AZ
Default

Because it is intermittent. That's how intermittent things work, intermittently.
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 10:10 AM
  #17  
Odell89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 136
Total Cats: -53
From: Bristol, Tennessee
Default

Intermittent working part. Constant problem.. Oh well.. New WB is supposed to arrive at my shop at some point today, hopefully I'll be able to install tonight, if I can get outta here at a decent hour, sucks though because, no room in the garage, old TR6 in the way, POS.. All dependent on weather because in cold weather, I am nothing more than a little old man. 😂
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 09:04 AM
  #18  
Odell89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 136
Total Cats: -53
From: Bristol, Tennessee
Default

New wideband went in last night, works exactly how it should, but with me tuning on the bad sensor, my tune is garbage, but the WB is actually telling me that now, I appreciate all of the input and opinions on this, very helpful. Thanks guys!
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 03:28 PM
  #19  
DanBrown's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 103
Total Cats: 3
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Glad to hear you got it set straight. The world is yours now.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.