Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

300-350whp goal build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2018, 01:12 AM
  #61  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
our charts do not look like normal Miata dynojet charts -- the torque builds more quickly than anyone has seem from that kind of setup before and the torque curve from 3900 to 5500 is much too flat. Miatas with stock cams almost always have a noticable peak in torque around 4800 RPM, that's just what the cams are tuned for.
Half agree. 94-00 motors have a defined torque peak at 4800rpm. VVT motors generally produce peak torque within 5% or so from ~4000rpm to 5500rpm or so. They can extend that plateau further depending on the intake manifold setup. A Squaretop will stretch that to 6000rpm, and a short-runner Honda manifold a bit further than that. Look at the two charts I posted a couple of posts ago - Acamas has a big torque spike at 4100 owing to a bit of boost overshoot, then tapers to a very flat torque plateau at ~400wtq from 4400-5500rpm. Boost is flat through this area. Theseus' old 2871R plots had very stable boost control all through torque peak, and more than 280wtq from 4200-6400 on a 294wtq peak.
Savington is offline  
Old 10-29-2018, 01:22 AM
  #62  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Half agree. 94-00 motors have a defined torque peak at 4800rpm. VVT motors generally produce peak torque within 5% or so from ~4000rpm to 5500rpm or so. They can extend that plateau further depending on the intake manifold setup. A Squaretop will stretch that to 6000rpm, and a short-runner Honda manifold a bit further than that. Look at the two charts I posted a couple of posts ago - Acamas has a big torque spike at 4100 owing to a bit of boost overshoot, then tapers to a very flat torque plateau at ~400wtq from 4400-5500rpm. Boost is flat through this area. Theseus' old 2871R plots had very stable boost control all through torque peak, and more than 280wtq from 4200-6400 on a 294wtq peak.
Yeah, but RTC's virtual dyno plots are FLAT. It shows 290 wtq plus or minus about 2, from 3900 to 5500. 5% would be a 15 wtq swing, which just isn't there.

--Ian

codrus is offline  
Old 10-29-2018, 07:27 AM
  #63  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ridethecliche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
Default

I have logs and the tune on my thread. I'm still tuning vvt, but the torque flatness may be due to some boost being fed in there. VVT is oscillating like mad right now.

I understand that VD is sensitive to variations in the ground which is why I usually do a pull in both directions and look at both together on a graph. Truth lies somewhere in the middle. That said, I do need to get over to a dyno to see what this thing is actually putting down. I'm pretty happy with things regardless, but just curious is all.
ridethecliche is offline  
Old 10-29-2018, 12:23 PM
  #64  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
Yeah, but RTC's virtual dyno plots are FLAT. It shows 290 wtq plus or minus about 2, from 3900 to 5500. 5% would be a 15 wtq swing, which just isn't there.

--Ian
No argument that RTC's VD numbers are flawed at best. Just saying that VVT motors produce a different torque curve than a 94-00 motor does
Savington is offline  
Old 10-29-2018, 12:27 PM
  #65  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

Dyno operator would be me (that is the raw dyno file I plotted in DynoJet viewer) guess I never looked closely at the scaling.

Wiring the wastegate shut on my currently stock bottom end would probably be a bad idea

Either way, that dyno day was not supposed to be representation of what my setup could do, it was a tuning tool. I used it to gather data at multiple boost levels so I could set up flat torque curves later on. My motor killing itself stopped that though.

I will say, 6758 at 7psi is still pretty fun
aidandj is offline  
Old 10-29-2018, 12:30 PM
  #66  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
Wiring the wastegate shut on my currently stock bottom end would probably be a bad idea
Bad for you, entertaining for us
Savington is offline  
Old 10-29-2018, 12:54 PM
  #67  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

Trade you a built shortblock for the carnage video
aidandj is offline  
Old 10-29-2018, 05:10 PM
  #68  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ridethecliche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
No argument that RTC's VD numbers are flawed at best. Just saying that VVT motors produce a different torque curve than a 94-00 motor does
Numbers are just numbers. It's a tuning tool at the end of the day. All my runs have been done in both directions on the exactly same stretch of road. I'm controlling for the easy stuff but it's obviously far from perfect.

I want to hit the dyno with a new map sensor and a tune for 30psi. ******* stoked!
ridethecliche is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 10-29-2018, 06:37 PM
  #69  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

E85?
aidandj is offline  
Old 10-29-2018, 06:40 PM
  #70  
503
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
503's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 87
Total Cats: -1
Default

No, just lots of this
503 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 10-29-2018, 08:24 PM
  #71  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ridethecliche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
E85?
93 pump.

Thoughts and prayers.

Hopes and dreams.

And probably some of that octane booster **** for the lulz.
ridethecliche is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 10-29-2018, 08:35 PM
  #72  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default



I had to start pulling crazy amounts of timing up there to make power without knock. Single digits timing is stupid.

Would not do again.

Last edited by aidandj; 10-29-2018 at 08:58 PM.
aidandj is offline  
Old 10-29-2018, 08:37 PM
  #73  
503
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
503's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 87
Total Cats: -1
Default

Yeah... But you're still pushing 30psi, do you know how cool the BOV will sound with that much boost?

Really cool
503 is offline  
Old 10-29-2018, 08:49 PM
  #74  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Welcome to 1700F+ EGTs. Good for melting stuff.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 10-30-2018, 12:22 AM
  #75  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ridethecliche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
Default

MIATA FONDUE!
ridethecliche is offline  
Old 10-30-2018, 07:15 PM
  #76  
Junior Member
 
Tran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Sussex, England
Posts: 223
Total Cats: 46
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
Welcome to 1700F+ EGTs. Good for melting stuff.

--Ian
How far can you go with the boost levels before the EGTs reach stock valve melty levels? (1650F?)
Tran is offline  
Old 10-30-2018, 10:50 PM
  #77  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by Tran
How far can you go with the boost levels before the EGTs reach stock valve melty levels? (1650F?)
It depends heavily on how much timing you run, and thus on how much octane you have.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 01:13 AM
  #78  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Anything less than 10deg of timing makes me nervous. In a track car, anything less than 12-13deg. If you need that much power in your track car, you need 100+ octane or E85.
Savington is offline  
Old 10-31-2018, 11:19 AM
  #79  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ridethecliche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
Default

I don't think my map goes down that low anywhere
ridethecliche is offline  
Old 11-04-2018, 08:35 PM
  #80  
Newb
 
Nurburgring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 18
Total Cats: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Anything less than 10deg of timing makes me nervous. In a track car, anything less than 12-13deg. If you need that much power in your track car, you need 100+ octane or E85.
Interesting. May I ask why? You´ve seen damage with that timing, or just afraid of EGT going off the charts?
Apples to oranges but I ran a stock turbo Evo 8 for years at the track on single digit timing at peak torque, 25psi, 93 oct. It didn´t burst into flames, regretably.
My only turbocharged miata experience involved this cutting edge ECU and a rising rate FMU. Miraculously it didn´t explode either.


Nurburgring is offline  


Quick Reply: 300-350whp goal build



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 AM.