Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

ARP head stud torque for a Miata.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 10:43 PM
  #21  
bbundy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Way too much conjecture and guessing in this thread for me. I followed the instructions that came in the box and I've had no problems at all.
What did the directions in your box say? I've never seen any instructions for them. I've had 4 boxes of these things and they never came with any instructions for torque level on a Miata.

There is a chart on the back of the box that has generic recommended torque values for 3 different material strength fasteners based on fastener diameter. They don't even tell you what material strength the fasteners that comes in the box are.

Again I have never seen a documented torque value for ARP head studs on a Miata. Go searching on line and you find wildly varying answers that dont seem right.

Bob
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 11:07 PM
  #22  
ftjandra's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 289
Total Cats: 8
From: Denver, CO
Default

The instructions that came with my ARP studs said to torque them to 65 ft-lbs with the ARP moly lube. I bought them from FM a long time ago and it came with a little pink instructions sheet.

Here it is:


--Ferdi
Old Jan 5, 2011 | 12:26 AM
  #23  
bbundy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by ftjandra
The instructions that came with my ARP studs said to torque them to 65 ft-lbs with the ARP moly lube. I bought them from FM a long time ago and it came with a little pink instructions sheet.

Here it is:


--Ferdi
Ok I got it.

None of my boxes I got ever came with that sheet. Maybe mine were Chinese knock offs or something from Ebay but the box says made in the USA. The threads in the block are 11mmX1.5 not 7/16" but I just verified the nut end is indeed 7/16X20 didn’t realize that before.

The back of the box says 63 ft-lbs for a 7/16 size stud and 71 ft-lbs for an 11mm stud.

And I can verify using the 70 or 85 lb values in the [A] part also shown on your sheet will yield the aluminum head with heat cycles and 85 lbs will likely turn your head into a paper weight. 65 Is probably more than necessary but OK I guess and it wouldn’t surprise me if it produced nearly double the stock clamp force> ~15,000 lbs of force per stud by there chart and the area under the washers is pretty small to apply that much force on aluminum especially when it heats up and expands more than the bolt does further increasing the clamp. I can also varify that 48 to 50 ft-lbs has no issues holding more than 300 hp.

Bob
Old Jan 5, 2011 | 09:46 AM
  #24  
astroboy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

I am not in any way calling you a liar but I'd like to see pics if you have any/still have the damaged head. This thread is a good one!
Old Jan 6, 2011 | 10:45 PM
  #25  
turbodog's dad's Avatar
THE BOSS ;)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23
Total Cats: 0
From: Palisade, CO
Default

The lower torque (48, IIRC) is what the original engineer at ARP came up with when we worked with them to build a correct Miata stud kit that was an exact fit. He was basing it on stud diameter, head thickness and OE torque values. That guy is gone now and nobody at ARP since then has ever agreed with the low number. But we have used it for a long time without issues and the original guy seemed to spend the time to study the application. YMMV. ARP is pretty funny sometimes, they'll send a box where none of the nuts are threaded or sometimes the studs. Seems to only happen when we ship overseas...
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 02:39 PM
  #26  
bbundy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by turbodog's dad
The lower torque (48, IIRC) is what the original engineer at ARP came up with when we worked with them to build a correct Miata stud kit that was an exact fit. He was basing it on stud diameter, head thickness and OE torque values. That guy is gone now and nobody at ARP since then has ever agreed with the low number. But we have used it for a long time without issues and the original guy seemed to spend the time to study the application. YMMV. ARP is pretty funny sometimes, they'll send a box where none of the nuts are threaded or sometimes the studs. Seems to only happen when we ship overseas...
I suspect the original guy was right and actually studied the application. I would about bet that 48 ends up with just around ~10% more clamp force than the stock parts at the OE torqe specs.

Bob
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 02:56 PM
  #27  
falcon's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

I will be torquing mine to 48-50ft/lbs after reading this thread. I'm glad the question was asked otherwise I would have followed the 85ft/lb direction.
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 06:07 PM
  #28  
greeenteeee's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 3
Default

I was questioning this as well as I noticed the difference between OEM and ARP torque values. I meant to retorque them as ppl told me I should go w/ ARP's specs (which I have on the box somewhere) but never got around to it.

Are the ARPs re-usable? Say since I torqued them down already and have gone through numerous heat cycles... I would like to loosen them, and start over to re-torque (especially since I don't remember what I tq'd them to)... would this be okay? Stock 1.6L... I threw on the ARPs "just cause."
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 06:13 PM
  #29  
Aricjm15's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 407
Total Cats: 2
From: Grayslake IL
Default

Yes ARP studs are re-useable. I would say that is one of the reasons people would choose ARP over a stock bolt.
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 06:24 PM
  #30  
astroboy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,787
Total Cats: 6
From: oahu
Default

Originally Posted by greeenteeee
Are the ARPs re-usable? Say since I torqued them down already and have gone through numerous heat cycles... I would like to loosen them, and start over to re-torque (especially since I don't remember what I tq'd them to)... would this be okay? Stock 1.6L... I threw on the ARPs "just cause."
When I presented this question to the guys at ARP they told me:

You have to check the stud with a micrometer (clamp it down on the non-threaded part and run it down the length of the stud) to ensure it didn't stretch and inspect it at the base of the threads (where they start on each end) visually. Those are the places that will stretch and generally they don't unless there is a mechanical failure (disconnected piston hits the head, blown head gasket).
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 07:25 PM
  #31  
bbundy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by greeenteeee
I was questioning this as well as I noticed the difference between OEM and ARP torque values. I meant to retorque them as ppl told me I should go w/ ARP's specs (which I have on the box somewhere) but never got around to it.

Are the ARPs re-usable? Say since I torqued them down already and have gone through numerous heat cycles... I would like to loosen them, and start over to re-torque (especially since I don't remember what I tq'd them to)... would this be okay? Stock 1.6L... I threw on the ARPs "just cause."
They are reusable because the studs or even the OE bolts for that matter don’t get anywhere near yield in the Miata application. But I would not loosen them if they are already torque unless you started with a fresh head gasket as well. Reducing clamp on the head gasket once it has been clamped to a certain level would be bad.

I suspect what happens if they are over torqed is the head starts to yield due to contact forces under the washers first. And that is another thing. ARP supply smaller OD hardened washers than OE so they will actually yield the head at a lower clamp force than OE as the contact pressure under the washer is higher. I have been tossing the ARP washers and using the OE ones to reduce this problem. So what happens is you torque them up near the point the head wants to yield and a few heat cycles the head yields a bit under the washers so stress and clamp force is reduced. This causes a reduction in clamp force, again this is bad.

Bob
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 07:38 PM
  #32  
240_to_miata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,617
Total Cats: 16
From: Cromwell, Connecticut
Default

Hmm. I have to double check the sheet mine came with and maybe that will jog my memory. I believe the first time I put the head on I torqued to 65-70 ftlbs ... but I had the head off at one point and probably followed the "using 30 wt " torque of 85 !!!!

I will do a lot less next time.
I haven't had any issues yet.
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #33  
bbundy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by 240_to_miata
Hmm. I have to double check the sheet mine came with and maybe that will jog my memory. I believe the first time I put the head on I torqued to 65-70 ftlbs ... but I had the head off at one point and probably followed the "using 30 wt " torque of 85 !!!!

I will do a lot less next time.
I haven't had any issues yet.
I think it was the 85 number that killed my head. one of the bosses cracked and the crack went into the water jacket.

Bob
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 09:53 PM
  #34  
falcon's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,499
Total Cats: 16
Default

I'll be torquing mine to 52 ft lbs.
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 07:52 AM
  #35  
Preluding's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,186
Total Cats: 4
From: Fredericton, NB
Default

I did mine to 70ft/lbs... :(

This should be in the useful threads sections
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 12:53 PM
  #36  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Oh ****, my M3 with its newfangled uber-torque ARP head studs just blew its gasket.
I hope the kilobuck ported head isn't trashed. :(
Old Jan 21, 2011 | 04:13 AM
  #37  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

FYI, I ordered two sets of studs for a couple of cars at the shop this week. Just opened the first box to install them and the instructions say 80 ft.lbs with ARP Ultra-Torque fastener lube.

I will be torquing to 65ft.lbs.
Old Jan 21, 2011 | 08:36 AM
  #38  
Larimer's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 308
Total Cats: 1
From: Novi, MI
Default

Torquing the studs to 65 ft-lbs puts about 740lb of axial load in the bolts, or slightly less using the lube on the threads. (this assumes 0.15 friction factor, but with the lube it's in the range of 0.11-0.17 from what I can tell) I'm not sure what the stock bolts are shooting for or if they're torque to yield bolts, so it's hard to compare. The 48ft-lb torque produces about 550lb of load in the bolt using the same friction assumption as above.
Old Jan 21, 2011 | 06:18 PM
  #39  
bbundy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
FYI, I ordered two sets of studs for a couple of cars at the shop this week. Just opened the first box to install them and the instructions say 80 ft.lbs with ARP Ultra-Torque fastener lube.

I will be torquing to 65ft.lbs.
80 ft-lbs just can't be right.
Old Jan 21, 2011 | 06:21 PM
  #40  
bbundy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Larimer
Torquing the studs to 65 ft-lbs puts about 740lb of axial load in the bolts, or slightly less using the lube on the threads. (this assumes 0.15 friction factor, but with the lube it's in the range of 0.11-0.17 from what I can tell) I'm not sure what the stock bolts are shooting for or if they're torque to yield bolts, so it's hard to compare. The 48ft-lb torque produces about 550lb of load in the bolt using the same friction assumption as above.
Stock torqe specs arent anywhere near yield in the stock bolts.

Need to calculate the area under the washer and see if it is enough pressure to yield the aluminum head Id guess the material would yield at about 41,000 psi cold for the cast aluminum head. As the head gets hot the clamp load increases and yeald occurs at a lower level. ARP studs also have smaller OD washers than stock which isnt helping things.

quick guesses I come up with .291 for area makes 2543 psi. shouldnt yield when tightened to 65 FT-lbs. bit more involved to look at effects of thermal expansion. The head will wan't to grow a lot more than the bolts when things get hot.

Bob

Last edited by bbundy; Jan 21, 2011 at 06:42 PM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 AM.