Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Built 1.8 VVT engine machine work

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2017, 11:48 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
konmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 307
Total Cats: 23
Default Built 1.8 VVT engine machine work

So I just took my engine to the machine shop to get work done to both the engine block and cylinder head. This will have a MK Turbo kit and will be swapped in a 1990 NA seen here https://www.miataturbo.net/build-thr...vt-swap-92987/. This will be mainly a street car with an occasional autox maybe track day. My power goal is 250-300 whp. I wanted to get quality parts for the engine build so I went with the following.

On the block I am going to be installing:
  • Supertech 8.6 CR 84mm pistonsw/ Wiseco rings
  • Manley H-beam rods
  • ACL Main and Rod bearings
  • ARP main studs.
  • new freeze plugs
On the head I'll be using:
  • Supertech +1mm oversize intake and exhaust valves
  • new valve guides
  • supertech valve seals
  • Supertech double valve springs
  • MMD SUB lifters.
The machinist is going to do the following:

Engine block:
  • Hot tank block
  • remove and install new freeze plugs
  • deck block
  • bore and hone
  • install pistons onto rods
  • install and gap rings for boost
  • line hone for main studs
  • install main and rod bearings using ARP hardware
Cylinder Head:
  • Hot tank head
  • 4 or 5 angle valve job
  • install new valve guides
  • cut valve seats and install bigger supertech valves
  • mild porting in bowls and runners
  • install double valve springs
  • install MMD SUB lifters and clearance with lash caps
  • probably have to tip the valves for proper clearance according to machinist
He mentioned getting the crank balanced and said he would ask his dad whether he thought it was needed. What do you guys think? Should I get the crank balanced while I'm already there getting all this work done? I'd like to rev this high so I think balancing would be a good idea. Another thing he asked was if I wanted the block to be torque plate bored/honed. I did a little bit of research on that and read different opinions, but what do you guys think? Should I get this done? If I remember correctly, he said it would be like $50 or $75 extra to do it with that torque plate.

Also I was thinking about gasket matching the intake ports on the head. Will it make a big power difference considering that I am going to have a built engine with boost? I want to do all I can while it's already there so any suggestions/recommendations are welcomed. They gave me a quote for $1495 for all this work. I supplied all the parts besides the valve guides and lash caps. He will be getting them from SI valves and the caps from Supertech. This shop works on a lot of different motors and has experience in building performance miata engines. It was recommended to me by another miata owner who has gotten work done there. When I took it there, I didn't really request any specific clearances, I did however mention it would be boosted. I trust they know their stuff since they've built performance miata engines before. Is there any specific tolerances I should be asking for when building a forced induction engine? Any and all comments about this are appreciated.

Thanks,
David

Last edited by konmo; 05-04-2017 at 11:09 PM.
konmo is offline  
Old 04-29-2017, 11:59 PM
  #2  
Art
Junior Member
 
Art's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 369
Total Cats: -251
Default

.

Last edited by Art; 06-11-2018 at 07:59 PM.
Art is offline  
Old 04-30-2017, 12:19 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
konmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 307
Total Cats: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Art
Yes torque plate, better safe than sorry. An iron block might not matter as much as an aluminum block but why not, it can't hurt. Similar to using the ARP main studs and torquing them to the spec you'll use before doing the line hone for the mains. The fact that they asked you those specific questions kind of indicates that they have some idea what they're doing. Clearance can be on the high side of factory spec for bearings but I'm not really an expert on that. Let's say bearing clearance spec is one and a half thousandths of an inch. If you actually measure and check the clearance of each bearing and it's even around 2 or 3 thousandths, you're doing your part to make sure the engine will be good. Generally speaking the more HP/race/hotter an engine will run the closer to max spec for your clearances is safer albeit maybe a bit more noisey and reduced longevity. Forged pistons should use a bit more clearance - in line with what Supertech says for that alloy and your HP goal. Gasket matching is up to you - a lot of times you can have a real small step around the edge getting bigger, i.e. head intake ports 1-2 mm larger diameter than intake manifold exit, exhaust manifold entrance 1-2 mm larger diameter than exhaust port exit. Not a huge difference. Any head work is worth modest gain but it's not really bang for buck performance. Be careful to take nothing or the smallest amount off the head and block since it changes compression, squish, and timing belt (angle) but since you're using 8.6 pistons it will probably be fine even if both surfaces are decked.

https://sites.google.com/a/philb.us/...Specifications
Wow that was quick. Thanks for the link. Lot's of helpful info. The machinist did say that the tolerances are better on the looser end so I'm assuming he'd be using factory spec tolerances on the max side, like you said. For the Supertech pistons, he said he would go with what supertech recommends to use. They have installed these pistons in BP engines so again seems like he knows what he's doing.
konmo is offline  
Old 04-30-2017, 12:27 AM
  #4  
Art
Junior Member
 
Art's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 369
Total Cats: -251
Default

.

Last edited by Art; 06-11-2018 at 07:59 PM.
Art is offline  
Old 04-30-2017, 12:39 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
konmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 307
Total Cats: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Art
For the crank balance - you can weigh each of the pistons and rods. Then either match them so each piston + rod assembly weighs as close as possible to the others, or shave/grind the rods and/or pistons in non-critical areas to weight match them. Actually you can try to only balance either the big end or small end of the rod depending on what needs it but that's getting pretty detailed. If that part of the rotating assembly is balanced, then the crank itself might not need it. But if the machine shop sounds like they know how to balance the whole crank better than it already is, I would say go for it but only if it needs it. Also measure individual piston diameters and hone the cylinders individually so the clearance is just right for each one, but the machine shop probably knows all about that.
He showed me around the shop and they have this neat machine where you put the crank and you can bolt on the rods/pistons to the crank so it can be balanced while they are on the crank. Again he said he would talk with his dad and see what his opinion was on whether it was needed. I feel like they know what they're doing with the boring and clearances, but I could ask what they're normal procedure is when boring out cylinders.
konmo is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 10:25 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Twibs415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 112
Default

If they bolt bob weights to your crank, they dont know what they are doing and you should leave with all your parts.
Twibs415 is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 10:35 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
konmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 307
Total Cats: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Twibs415
If they bolt bob weights to your crank, they dont know what they are doing and you should leave with all your parts.
I'm not exactly sure how they're going to get it balanced. If I remember correctly, they had a Sunnen crankshaft balancer. I was told by the owner's son that they do work for Track Speed Engineering so I trust that they know what they're doing.

​​Is it bad to balance your crank using Bob weights? I'm not really sure how that works.
konmo is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 11:15 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Twibs415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 615
Total Cats: 112
Default

bob weights are not used to balance an inline 4 cylinder crank.
Twibs415 is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 11:26 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
konmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 307
Total Cats: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Twibs415
bob weights are not used to balance an inline 4 cylinder crank.
I see, I'm going to do a bit of reading on that. So what do they do when they say balance the rotating assembly? Do they only balance the rods and pistons and leave the crank as is?
konmo is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 11:47 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
konmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 307
Total Cats: 23
Default

Okay so I read up on balancing the rotating assembly. Like Twibs said In-line cranks do not require a bob weight to be added for balancing. From what I read they weigh and balance the pistons and correct them if they're off. They do the same for the rods and also like Art said, they balance the big end and small end of the rods. So what about the crank? If they don't use bob weights, then do they just put it on the machine by itself? If that's the case I don't think it would need balancing, I would guess that Mazda did that at the factory, but what do I know. Same thing with the rods and pistons. The rods are new Manley H beams and I believe they are already weight matched pretty close to each other. I do remember seeing a paper inside with the weights of each one. The Supertech pistons I think would also be weight matched, not sure on that one. I bought these used, so would it be a good idea to get them check and weight matched if needed? What about the rods and crank? I'm not sure if I should even get this done.
konmo is offline  
Old 05-05-2017, 09:08 AM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
mr.skywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 145
Total Cats: 4
Default

When I was having my machine work done on my engine my builder told me that an inline 4 usually does not need to have the crank balanced and only need to balance the rods and pistons(which i did myself). I believe the theory is like you said, the crank is a flat plain, so even with the masses of the rods and pistons changing, it should not affect the balance of the whole assembly. I would assume that the only reason to put it on the balancer is to improve on Mazdas original balance or if you knife edging/ bull-nosing which is not common. He recommended I didnt as it was so expensive for such little gain, and having about 900miles on the engine I agree as this engine is about 10 times smoother than any stock BP or B6 engine I have driven.
mr.skywalker is offline  
Old 05-05-2017, 03:53 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
konmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 307
Total Cats: 23
Default

Originally Posted by mr.skywalker
When I was having my machine work done on my engine my builder told me that an inline 4 usually does not need to have the crank balanced and only need to balance the rods and pistons(which i did myself). I believe the theory is like you said, the crank is a flat plain, so even with the masses of the rods and pistons changing, it should not affect the balance of the whole assembly. I would assume that the only reason to put it on the balancer is to improve on Mazdas original balance or if you knife edging/ bull-nosing which is not common. He recommended I didn't as it was so expensive for such little gain, and having about 900miles on the engine I agree as this engine is about 10 times smoother than any stock BP or B6 engine I have driven.
I spoke with the machinist today and asked that he weight match the pistons/rods and leave the crank as is. I don't think I need to improve on the Mazda's original balance like you say, but I'd like to at least check the pistons and rods since they are lighter than stock and since the pistons were used.
konmo is offline  




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.