Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Burnt valve at 20 psi?

Old Dec 8, 2025 | 06:25 PM
  #21  
andyfloyd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,164
Total Cats: 97
From: Louisville,KY
Default

Looking at your log are you really only running 9* of total advance at 20psi? On pump gas I run 18* over 5500rpm and 14* ish throughout the midrange, while running a tapering boost curve from 17-20 psi as rpms increase. Your timing especially for running ethanol is really low, not sure if that contributed to this issue but high egt from severe lack of timing could cause a valve to melt. Fwiw I run OEM valves all the way up to 26 psi with no issues no super tech I'm disappointed.... Plus you said it's not even SS that's shady.
Old Dec 9, 2025 | 12:44 PM
  #22  
yaboi12256's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 20
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by andyfloyd
Looking at your log are you really only running 9* of total advance at 20psi? On pump gas I run 18* over 5500rpm and 14* ish throughout the midrange, while running a tapering boost curve from 17-20 psi as rpms increase. Your timing especially for running ethanol is really low, not sure if that contributed to this issue but high egt from severe lack of timing could cause a valve to melt. Fwiw I run OEM valves all the way up to 26 psi with no issues no super tech I'm disappointed.... Plus you said it's not even SS that's shady.

Yeah this is my first ever ignition table that I've really tried to put together honestly impressed on how long this head lasted, at least I didn't go the other way and melt my bottom end. I got no pre exsisting knowledge of roughly where the ignition values should be. Given the research on high boost tables I did on the internet, I tried do what was safe but I guess I was too "safe". Is the shape of the curve from 3-7k at mid to 20psi look right? Maybe its time I fold and pay for an Hp academy course or something lol. Or just raise the timing numbers if the curve seems alright. All ignition values at 10psi of boost or below were ripped straight from my friends stock motor nb so that probably also needs a fine tooth comb.
Old Dec 9, 2025 | 06:35 PM
  #23  
themonkeyman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 697
Total Cats: 91
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by yaboi12256
Finally the machine shop is working on the head. Interestingly enough only the intake valves on 2 and 3 were tuliped and had zero lash. The lash on the burnt up exhaust valves were fine, guides are a little out of spec so I'm getting the bronze ones from fab9. Interestingly enough he also said the valves were not stainless (magnet stuck to it) and that they were only 1mm oversized even though I know I ordered the 2mm stainless from fab 9 when I originaly put it together so idk what happened there. Going to richen up the tune under boost and wait for my inconel fm intake valves to come in. Curious if I somehow got bad valves or something because cylinders 1 and 4s lash were fine on the intake side and I have the supertech dual spring/ti hardware package and was only revving to 7.5k so I know float isnt an issue. So I guess all inconel valves, bronze guides for the exahust, and 1 valve seat aint the worst thing.
Well, very high heat can lead to certain blends of stainless becoming magnetic. Inconel for exhaust isn't a bad idea for a turbo car, but not always necessary. Inconel intake valves seems like a waste of money IMO. Also, it is entirely possible that the lash was in spec (maybe at the tighter end) but given the discussion of your ignition timing, your EGTs were likely through the roof and the valves may have just gotten way hotter than intended and expanded to the point that a few of them got to negative lash and were unable to contact the seats. But once cold and shrunken back to normal size, the lash may be within reason. If it was purely heat expansion causing the issue, its a vicious cycle, because once they stop contacting the valve seat, they lose what little heat rejection ability they had and the edges of the valve start to erode rapidly, as you saw.

TLDR: This was likely user error and not a bad set of valves (sorry to be blunt, don't mean anything by it)
Old Dec 9, 2025 | 07:36 PM
  #24  
andyfloyd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,164
Total Cats: 97
From: Louisville,KY
Default

Originally Posted by yaboi12256
Yeah this is my first ever ignition table that I've really tried to put together honestly impressed on how long this head lasted, at least I didn't go the other way and melt my bottom end. I got no pre exsisting knowledge of roughly where the ignition values should be. Given the research on high boost tables I did on the internet, I tried do what was safe but I guess I was too "safe". Is the shape of the curve from 3-7k at mid to 20psi look right? Maybe its time I fold and pay for an Hp academy course or something lol. Or just raise the timing numbers if the curve seems alright. All ignition values at 10psi of boost or below were ripped straight from my friends stock motor nb so that probably also needs a fine tooth comb.
In my opinion for 20psi and e85 you should be running over 20*. When I say 20* that's after tq peak, although with e85 you can get away with a lot more timing. On my car at say 22psi with 100 octane (still not as good as e85) I'm running 14-15* of timing through to tq peak which is usually around 5000-5500rpm after that I ramp it in and end up with 21* at 7200rpm. I can try to take a picture of my timing map if I can get this old XP laptop to turn on lol. I have an ancient Hydra ECU so I have to use this old *** laptop.

Tq peak is probably where the engines VE is highest and then drops after that so the added timing helps prop up the power to redline.
Old Dec 9, 2025 | 08:08 PM
  #25  
yaboi12256's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 20
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by themonkeyman
Well, very high heat can lead to certain blends of stainless becoming magnetic. Inconel for exhaust isn't a bad idea for a turbo car, but not always necessary. Inconel intake valves seems like a waste of money IMO. Also, it is entirely possible that the lash was in spec (maybe at the tighter end) but given the discussion of your ignition timing, your EGTs were likely through the roof and the valves may have just gotten way hotter than intended and expanded to the point that a few of them got to negative lash and were unable to contact the seats. But once cold and shrunken back to normal size, the lash may be within reason. If it was purely heat expansion causing the issue, its a vicious cycle, because once they stop contacting the valve seat, they lose what little heat rejection ability they had and the edges of the valve start to erode rapidly, as you saw.

TLDR: This was likely user error and not a bad set of valves (sorry to be blunt, don't mean anything by it)
No, thank you I appreciate the honesty. I didn't know about the heat turning the SS ferrous (if im understanding that right) which would absolutely make sense and also point to the intake valves being overheated as well. I am still curious about only the intake valves on 2&3 being tuliped and not having holes burned directly though the face unlike the 1 exhaust valve on cylinder 2 , was that just because of too much heat and more or less "forging" the valves as they slam up against the seat and deforming them? I thought that could only appear when dealing with valve float. I got the Inconel intakes just to be safe, as I'm going to continue tuning it myself as I try again this time around and give myself some more leeway. Also kinda just wanted to ball out on them tbh.

Last edited by yaboi12256; Dec 9, 2025 at 08:19 PM.
Old Dec 9, 2025 | 08:14 PM
  #26  
yaboi12256's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 20
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by andyfloyd
In my opinion for 20psi and e85 you should be running over 20*. When I say 20* that's after tq peak, although with e85 you can get away with a lot more timing. On my car at say 22psi with 100 octane (still not as good as e85) I'm running 14-15* of timing through to tq peak which is usually around 5000-5500rpm after that I ramp it in and end up with 21* at 7200rpm. I can try to take a picture of my timing map if I can get this old XP laptop to turn on lol. I have an ancient Hydra ECU so I have to use this old *** laptop.

Tq peak is probably where the engines VE is highest and then drops after that so the added timing helps prop up the power to redline.

If you could get a screenshot of the table I would greatly appreciate it. Even though the software is old a table is a table . Also out of curiosity is this at 9:1 compression or higher? Im sitting at 9:1 on my motor
Old Dec 9, 2025 | 09:13 PM
  #27  
andyfloyd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,164
Total Cats: 97
From: Louisville,KY
Default

Originally Posted by yaboi12256
If you could get a screenshot of the table I would greatly appreciate it. Even though the software is old a table is a table . Also out of curiosity is this at 9:1 compression or higher? Im sitting at 9:1 on my motor
My pistons are 8.8:1 but I've had the head decked twice so it's probably hovering around 9:1. I'll fire up the laptop tomorrow after work. Also, I remember when I was building my head I wanted to go +1 valves but it was around COVID and they were all sold out. But I wanted to go with Manley valves people have had issues with the supertech in the past. Heck I'm using OEM valves and they are solid.
Found this on my phone. This is like 4 years old but the tune hasnt really changed much if at all. The Hydra has a lot of resolution for the timing map.
Found this on my phone. This is like 4 years old but the tune hasn't really changed much if at all. The Hydra has a lot of resolution for the timing map. Keep in mind this is with me running 93 octane with a VP octane booster that brings octane to 99-100 octane. You could get away with more on e85.



Last edited by andyfloyd; Dec 9, 2025 at 09:32 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sezgin
Engine Performance
17
Aug 28, 2024 06:49 PM
NASSEX
Engine Performance
8
Jan 14, 2021 02:55 AM
Madjak
Engine Performance
6
Jan 19, 2017 09:47 AM
k24madness
Engine Performance
22
Nov 25, 2014 11:01 AM
gooflophaze
Engine Performance
1
Oct 15, 2012 01:29 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 PM.