Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

does 64mm throttle body needs intake manifold inlet to be bored to same size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2016, 03:01 PM
  #41  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

Oh snap, I have no more excuses. Looks like I'll have to do my fuel upgrades sooner than later too.
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 07-15-2016, 06:21 AM
  #42  
Junior Member
 
MintyTheEunos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 47
Total Cats: -7
Default

Right it's all fitted and running sweet with no leaks. Sure feels like less pedal makes more throttle due to the bigger butterfly which is fun. Not sure if it will gain any peak power but time will tell! Looks cool none the less Name:  yes.gif
Views: 2016
Size:  687 Bytes

Slight whistle at part throttle due to resonance down the channel to the idle control valve (from reading a post on here) but barely audible over the exhaust and choo choo

does 64mm throttle body needs intake manifold inlet to be bored to same size?-20160714_191145_zpsavkhbeaf.jpg

does 64mm throttle body needs intake manifold inlet to be bored to same size?-20160714_175633_zpsz3fqgkud.jpg

does 64mm throttle body needs intake manifold inlet to be bored to same size?-20160714_175616_zpsbctcsd5q.jpg

does 64mm throttle body needs intake manifold inlet to be bored to same size?-20160714_175601_zpsfaclpz0u.jpg

does 64mm throttle body needs intake manifold inlet to be bored to same size?-20160714_175550_zps7qltqmxm.jpg
MintyTheEunos is offline  
Old 07-15-2016, 02:47 PM
  #43  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

This sounds like content that should be in a build thread
EO2K is offline  
Old 07-15-2016, 04:11 PM
  #44  
Junior Member
 
MintyTheEunos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 47
Total Cats: -7
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
This sounds like content that should be in a build thread
Done it. 144 views and one comment. Meh :(

It's looooong and not bandwidth friendly
Andy
MintyTheEunos is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 01:50 PM
  #45  
Junior Member
 
MintyTheEunos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 47
Total Cats: -7
Default

Well the results are in and it's not what I expected at all. The car felt quicker and we will see why in a minute. I'm pretty sure it's all gone back together as it should with no boost leaks so let's go on the assumption that this is the case.

Today was hotter and a lot stickier than last run but I had a chance to get down so had to take the opportunity.

Peak torque and power figures were down from last time I'm sad to say (-5hp and -7Nm). I was mortified by this I'll be honest. The guys at the garage said that the hot and muggy conditions will have accounted for this and a freeer flowing mani won't be detrimental to peak power so read it as "makes no difference"

Not sure if they were trying to make me feel better but I'd have liked to have seen more or the same peak power. Never mind it's an experiment.

Anyway now for the exciting part. The engine makes loads more power as it comes onto boost now between 3 and 4k in fact it makes a huge lump in this area which is why it feels quicker.

I've tried to get a rough idea of figures but at 3.5k rpm it's making circa +17hp and +30Nm (22ft lb)

This is a result in my eyes big gains from quicker spooling makes for big fun. I'd like to see the peak power back but maybe on a crisper cooler day.

Sorry for the ramble it's been a long week.

Dyno sheet here

Name:  20160721_164717_zpsqlyduk7p.jpg
Views: 1924
Size:  2.74 MB


Name:  20160721_165425_zpswakd5mk5.jpg
Views: 1932
Size:  2.94 MB




MintyTheEunos is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 02:18 PM
  #46  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

Whatever, more power early on is a good trade off for marginal difference up top. I'd be happy with gains like that and the security of not having screws fly into a built motor.
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 02:38 PM
  #47  
Junior Member
 
MintyTheEunos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 47
Total Cats: -7
Default

Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
Whatever, more power early on is a good trade off for marginal difference up top. I'd be happy with gains like that and the security of not having screws fly into a built motor.
I agree especially for a road car. It really gulps in that boost and gets on its toes now. Overall I'm happy
MintyTheEunos is offline  
Old 07-23-2016, 12:14 AM
  #48  
lvw
Junior Member
 
lvw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hanover,Va
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 4
Default

Ok,I have the tb,now need a built motor to put behind it. Oh and some ac in the garage. Yes,wooos!
lvw is offline  
Old 07-24-2016, 04:43 AM
  #49  
Junior Member
 
MintyTheEunos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 47
Total Cats: -7
Default

Originally Posted by lvw
Ok,I have the tb,now need a built motor to put behind it. Oh and some ac in the garage. Yes,wooos!
Nice one. Are you porting out your inlet mmanifold?
MintyTheEunos is offline  
Old 07-25-2016, 11:55 PM
  #50  
lvw
Junior Member
 
lvw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hanover,Va
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 4
Default

Yes , but first must buy eurosquaretop, since this is a change I want to make
lvw is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
04-21-2016 03:00 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
10-03-2015 11:04 AM
Aroundcorner
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
10-01-2015 03:20 PM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
10-01-2015 09:30 AM



Quick Reply: does 64mm throttle body needs intake manifold inlet to be bored to same size?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 AM.