Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Intake, Exhaust, ECU: Pick 2 for 1.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2020, 06:31 PM
  #1  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Matthew Roberts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Total Cats: 1
Default Intake, Exhaust, ECU: Pick 2 for 1.6

My local AutoX club has its own set of classing and my ‘90 has a fully maxed out suspension, but I still have 2 points to spare before going up a class. It already has an FM cat/mid pipe/axle back. The logical mods are intake, headers, ECU, but each costs a point. So if you can only choose two, which do you choose:
1) Randall intake, RB header
2) MSASM intake + Speeduino
3) RB header + FM Randall intake

Thanks.
Matthew Roberts is offline  
Old 06-21-2020, 07:25 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
andyfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 1,129
Total Cats: 97
Default

Whichever choice has the ECU. That will be the single best thing you can do. You'll pick up 10-15hp across the whole rev range with a good tune.
andyfloyd is offline  
Old 06-21-2020, 07:25 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
andyfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 1,129
Total Cats: 97
Default

Also the 1.6 has a decent header from the factory so probably some sort of intake would also be good
andyfloyd is offline  
Old 06-21-2020, 11:19 PM
  #4  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,232
Total Cats: 1,149
Default

With a tuned CAS on factory ECU, you’ll pick up hp above 6000 with a MS by removing the AFM, 5, maybe 10hp. Not 10-15 across the whole rev range though.

personally I’d do a header and exhaust, and wait for intake until I switched to a 1.8 thermostat neck, ditched the AFM, and did a decent intake+ECU.
curly is offline  
Old 06-22-2020, 08:48 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
 
x_25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: NorthWest NJ
Posts: 1,821
Total Cats: 141
Default

ECU and then intake if you can use it to get rid of the AFM.

The big difference for the ECU on my car (even with a junk street tune while I was learning to tune it) was the way quicker throttle response and a huge pickup in torque before 4000rpm. Made a huge difference pulling out of slow corners in 2nd gear at autocross. I managed to make 100.6rwhp on 87 with a junk tune, AFM replaced by a piece of 2.5" conduit with the GMIAT in it and an ebay cat back. I could (slowly but surely) reel in stock NA8s in the straights on track.
x_25 is offline  
Old 06-22-2020, 09:30 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Artifex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 155
Total Cats: 23
Default

Personally, I'd vote for the intake + ECU.

while my NA still had the 1.6, an ECU, AFM delete and Intake was the first power adder I did to it. Everything else on the car was still stock. I have no numbers to compare it with but there was a noticeable bump in power in all areas. I don't know that I'd call it 10-15 though.
Artifex is offline  
Old 06-22-2020, 02:34 PM
  #7  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,690
Total Cats: 3,019
Default

Intake and ECU to ditch the restrictive MAF and get a cooler air source. Then tune spark and fuel for power rather than economy.

And doing the intake and exhaust without an ECU won't help you much because you won't be able to tune fuel for any additional airflow.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 06-22-2020, 03:17 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
andym's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 559
Total Cats: 77
Default

It looks like my post didn't make it through.
Based off of what you said, I think the best mods as far as power is concerned would be an ecu and an intake mod. The advantage of the ecu mod is that you can remove the AFM which is the intake restriction so those mods go hand in hand.
I would suggest the 3d printed intake that Alec Moody developed and posted in a thread here and on the website thingiverse for all of use to download and use on our personal cars. I have one in my miata and I am satisfied with the results.

The 3d intake can be used on a 1.6 engine. Attached is a picture of my engine bay back when I had my 1.6 engine.



https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3001440

andym is offline  
Old 06-22-2020, 05:12 PM
  #9  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Matthew Roberts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 19
Total Cats: 1
Default

Yes, that's the intake that I'll use if I go w/ the ECU+intake. I just priced one out on Xometry and it was $62 for Nylon 12 SLS. I will use your wrapping for some extra integrity and sealing.

Thanks for the info.

Matt.

Originally Posted by andym
It looks like my post didn't make it through.
Based off of what you said, I think the best mods as far as power is concerned would be an ecu and an intake mod. The advantage of the ecu mod is that you can remove the AFM which is the intake restriction so those mods go hand in hand.
I would suggest the 3d printed intake that Alec Moody developed and posted in a thread here and on the website thingiverse for all of use to download and use on our personal cars. I have one in my miata and I am satisfied with the results.

The 3d intake can be used on a 1.6 engine. Attached is a picture of my engine bay back when I had my 1.6 engine.



https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3001440
Matthew Roberts is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thumpetto007
Engine Performance
32
05-19-2017 05:13 PM
Charmin89
Fabulous Fabrication
11
05-03-2016 09:04 AM
No lift
Miata parts for sale/trade
0
07-10-2015 02:37 PM
emilio700
Engine Performance
83
09-25-2014 03:32 PM
eraser
MEGAsquirt
9
09-08-2010 06:18 PM



Quick Reply: Intake, Exhaust, ECU: Pick 2 for 1.6



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 AM.