Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

itb na build questions????

Old Jul 31, 2013 | 11:21 AM
  #21  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

You can get bad gas anywhere, though...

11:1 on an n/a Miata is just fine on 91 octane.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 11:28 AM
  #22  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Alright we'll just agree to disagree then. I'd rather have the ability to raise timing because the car is running like a peach and hasn't produced a single knock event in ages rather than drive around constantly trying to listen to the motor and hoping that the knock sensor picks up the noise and pulls timing in time should that happen. (or run little girl timing because i r scurrd)
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 11:31 AM
  #23  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

I'd just prefer to not build an n/a Miata in the first place.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 12:31 PM
  #24  
miata2fast's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,145
Total Cats: 175
From: Dover, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
What an ignorant statement.

Have you ever tuned high compression cars for track duty on AZ, CA, NV or CO using a bad batch of pump gas?

No? Then kindly put a cork in it.
I love it when you talk dirty to me.

We are not talking a big motor here, and 11:1 is not a lot of compression. I was implying that someone who knew what they were doing would tune appropriately if the situation was risky, say a very hot track or a long distance trip where fuel could be questionable.

Cake walk.....
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 12:47 PM
  #25  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Old Jul 31, 2013 | 12:47 PM
  #26  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

OP what is your power goal? I would say for NA doing what TSE does (10:1 + VVT + squaretop, maybe shave the head for more compression) is the way to go. If you need more than 150whp, then get a small turbo. Is there a reason you want to stay NA? A 180whp turbo car will be a lot more reliable than a 180whp NA car.

NA, powerful, reliable on CA 91. Pick 2.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 01:20 PM
  #27  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,705
Total Cats: 904
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Originally Posted by miata2fast
For a conservative power goal, I will take a healthy N/A over an entry level to moderate turbo set up any day.
Says the guy running carburetors on a miata.



I kidd. Seriously though a lot of this depends on where you live. Are you at sea level with dense humid air? N/A can be very enjoyable. At 7,200 feet in the desert/mountains where I live? Boost is a must have. ****, 4psi of boost gets me 105kpa total. I literally don't make make any more power than a stock miata at sea level until boost pressures are over 4psi.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 01:41 PM
  #28  
soviet's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,493
Total Cats: 269
From: VA
Default

Why don't you run E85? There are a metric fuckton E85 stations in Chicago.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 01:58 PM
  #29  
compaddict's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 109
Total Cats: 7
Default

The big problem with ITTB is that they really don't like air filters. Something about laminar air flow. A bunch of power gets lost when you start getting in the way of the horns. That being said, I would go to a custom single hole manifold or a square top.
I love my ITTB setup and have no tuning issues like so many, but if I had to run an air cleaner I would run something different.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 02:02 PM
  #30  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by compaddict
The big problem with ITTB is that they really don't like air filters. Something about laminar air flow. A bunch of power gets lost when you start getting in the way of the horns. That being said, I would go to a custom single hole manifold or a square top.
I love my ITTB setup and have no tuning issues like so many, but if I had to run an air cleaner I would run something different.
Optimally you'd have a sealed plenum around the velocity stacks and would be feeding it cold air and have a filter before the plenum.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 02:05 PM
  #31  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Filters are for pussies.


Roll boss status.


Attached Thumbnails itb na build questions????-20130116_071531.jpg  
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 02:07 PM
  #32  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

and when it rains, you get water injection.

win win
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 02:09 PM
  #33  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

I have a separate timing map for rainy weather. It's super awesome.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 11:15 PM
  #34  
stick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 53
Total Cats: 2
From: west chicago, il
Default

thanks for the amusing thread. the reason i wont turbo is because i love the sound of the itbs i have already built a more stock motor with them, now i want something a little more serious. I want to have power and to be able to use it. im not like some people who dont know their own limits and think more is better even at 400 horsepower. these people tend to wreck their ****. ive seen my car get quick just by having the right coils and plugs. ive seen what modifying the cas sensor can do for drivablity. I want to refine what is there not throw a turbo at it and call it a day.

where most people use a five pound sledge i find myself using a finish hammer. If you know what i mean.
I hope offend anyone.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 11:19 PM
  #35  
stick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 53
Total Cats: 2
From: west chicago, il
Default

now to get to the point. have been told by a realiable source that 10.5 is the most you can do on 91 fuel i will be using a knock sensor and map but i need some input on the known limitations of similar setups to mine to have a decent starting point.
thanks
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 11:21 PM
  #36  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

do you do exclusively canyon carving or track in this thing? cause then your statements would somewhat make sense (though on big tracks you'd still get left in the dust by the turbo boys)

as to your most recent post:

what exactly are you asking about? which limitations? power? what..

having only glanced at your vague description, I'd guess 140-170
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 11:21 PM
  #37  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Optimally you'd have a sealed plenum around the velocity stacks and would be feeding it cold air and have a filter before the plenum.
^This

Ive heard about drag bikes picking up several mph trap just from adding an airbox, and they were not running filters to begin with.
The only reason we see so many open throat IRTBs is because people think it looks cool.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 11:29 PM
  #38  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by stick
now to get to the point. have been told by a realiable source that 10.5 is the most you can do on 91 fuel i will be using a knock sensor and map but i need some input on the known limitations of similar setups to mine to have a decent starting point.
thanks

What's the reasoning that there's only a half point leeway between stock compression and blowing your motor on 91 octane? That doesn't make sense for quite a few reasons.
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 11:32 PM
  #39  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

lolol her we go again

I have personally made a 99nb with 01 shortblock knock on a very hot day on pump gas with a lot of load (going up some mountains). Stock everything else. And that's 10:1 only. It is very much possible
Old Jul 31, 2013 | 11:35 PM
  #40  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Ive seen 14.0:1 CR on 93 octane... so yeah...

Whoever thinks 10.5:1 is the maximum static CR on 91 octane is probably a domestic guy who is used to garbage wedge combustion chamber heads and low duration cam profiles.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 AM.