Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Oil squirters for n/a build

Old Jun 10, 2013 | 01:25 AM
  #21  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by chriscar
In the FWD SR20 world, USDM engines don't have squirters, while SR20VE's do, and their oil temps run allot hotter on the track. That heat your taking out of the pistons has to go somewhere, and it goes into the oil.

C
Anecdotal evidence of why I think coating the tops of the pistons is part of the equation.

Prevent the heat from getting to and building up in the piston and then you don’t have to worry about pulling it out in a manner where the cooling system has to deal with it.
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 02:17 AM
  #22  
Oscar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,022
Total Cats: 120
From: Bolton, UK
Default

Wouldn't the higher compression give a lot less heat in the compression chamber (and thus the piston) with its more effective burn? They're 10.5 static and whatever it ends up being after headwork etc.

If it matters, I have a 13 row oil cooler and a shimmed VVT BE oil pump. Will discuss with my builder too of course.
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 10:57 PM
  #23  
miata2fast's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,145
Total Cats: 175
From: Dover, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Oscar
Wouldn't the higher compression give a lot less heat in the compression chamber (and thus the piston) with its more effective burn? They're 10.5 static and whatever it ends up being after headwork etc.

If it matters, I have a 13 row oil cooler and a shimmed VVT BE oil pump. Will discuss with my builder too of course.
The opposite is true. The more power you make the more heat you make. Also, physics has shown that the simple act of compressing a gas creates heat.
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 12:08 AM
  #24  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by miata2fast
The opposite is true. The more power you make the more heat you make. Also, physics has shown that the simple act of compressing a gas creates heat.
Also more compression will require a bit more retarded timing to avoid knock = more heat.

On my dodge diesel with a compression ratio of 17:1 I can generate higher egt engine braking downhill with the exhaust brake and no fuel at all than I do cruising down a flat road burning fuel. Purely heat from compression.
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 01:11 AM
  #25  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Oscar
Wouldn't the higher compression give a lot less heat in the compression chamber (and thus the piston) with its more effective burn? They're 10.5 static and whatever it ends up being after headwork etc.

If it matters, I have a 13 row oil cooler and a shimmed VVT BE oil pump. Will discuss with my builder too of course.
more squish = more heat.

But 10.5 really isn't that high Plus I believe in the Netherlands you get a lot better pump gas than we get here in the states so you can probably optimize your timing a bit more assuming you are not running race gas.

I do not believe what you are building will be bad or problematic.
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 02:21 AM
  #26  
Oscar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,022
Total Cats: 120
From: Bolton, UK
Default

Thanks for the replies, keep 'm coming. Will be using ron98 (your 93 I think). The nearest E85 pump is 1+ hours away, so for now that's not an option unfortunately

For poops and giggles I looked around for ceramic coatings and the most decent option was in the uk and would cost €500 at least. That would buy me a fresh set of wisecos....
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 03:12 AM
  #27  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Oscar
Thanks for the replies, keep 'm coming. Will be using ron98 (your 93 I think). The nearest E85 pump is 1+ hours away, so for now that's not an option unfortunately

For poops and giggles I looked around for ceramic coatings and the most decent option was in the uk and would cost €500 at least. That would buy me a fresh set of wisecos....
California gas premium is 91. And I think it is optimistic to call it 91. Some states get 92 or 93. 98 is basically like our race gas that cost ~3X as much as pump gas. I don't even understand why we get different gas quality across the country but it all pretty much sucks compared to most places in the world.
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 03:24 AM
  #28  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by bbundy
California gas premium is 91. And I think it is optimistic to call it 91. Some states get 92 or 93. 98 is basically like our race gas that cost ~3X as much as pump gas. I don't even understand why we get different gas quality across the country but it all pretty much sucks compared to most places in the world.
mon+ron/2 != ron
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 08:32 AM
  #29  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by bbundy
California gas premium is 91. And I think it is optimistic to call it 91. Some states get 92 or 93. 98 is basically like our race gas that cost ~3X as much as pump gas. I don't even understand why we get different gas quality across the country but it all pretty much sucks compared to most places in the world.
I've never been to a state where I cant get 93. Actually come to think of it I know of a few places I can fill up with 110 octane CAM2 (leaded) straight out of the pump that isnt a race track... Just dont let the attendant see you put it straight into a street car, off road only.
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 12:08 PM
  #30  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
I've never been to a state where I cant get 93. Actually come to think of it I know of a few places I can fill up with 110 octane CAM2 (leaded) straight out of the pump that isnt a race track... Just dont let the attendant see you put it straight into a street car, off road only.
92 here in Washington. My car wouldn't run well on track at all on the pump gas in California the last time I tried it. Luckily I was at a track where I could get VP100. I have found there are risks with retarding the timing in that egt’s go way up and you start having more issues like burning exhaust valves, turbo manifold connections developing issues, or turbo manifold cracking. At 350 hp the margin of reliability is not very wide for a lot of issues under heavy track use.
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 12:31 PM
  #31  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

I'd remove them and not think twice about it. At the very least, you'll get better oil pressure out of it.

Not entirely related, but the KL i'm building to replace my dun blowed up one has no oil squirters. Mazda themselves removed them later in the engine's life.

And i'm going to spin that ****** to 10krpms or more.
Old Jun 21, 2013 | 09:26 AM
  #32  
psiturbo's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 160
Total Cats: 0
Default

We are lucky enough to get 100 Sunoco at the pump, and genuine 93 on almost any gas station here in north FL.

In no way the gasoline is the same in CA. have seen plenty of nasty cylinder heads on CA jun yards, insane amount of additive is added to the gasoline. Once I came here to FL, most blocks I would strip open had nice clean valves top end.
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 06:35 AM
  #33  
Oscar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,022
Total Cats: 120
From: Bolton, UK
Default

Discussed with my builder today and decided to leave the squirters in. Oil pressure shouldn't be an issue with the shimmed VVT pump. He will clearance the piston skirts if necessary. Thanks for the input.
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 06:48 AM
  #34  
miata2fast's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,145
Total Cats: 175
From: Dover, FL
Default

I am really surprised by your decision. What swayed it?
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 07:27 AM
  #35  
Oscar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,022
Total Cats: 120
From: Bolton, UK
Default

His experiences mainly. He's building the IL motorsport endurance car's motor too and they too decided to leave them in. Pressure should be more than ok with the BE pump, temperature should be kept in check easily with my 13 row oil cooler and big rad. Running the squirters would also allow to use the tighter end of the piston-to-wall clearance and reduce noise/wear. The spraying on the piston bottom would also help lubricating the small end (wrist pin?) and help cool the piston crown, especially when it's not coated. If I were to coat them, deleting the squirters would probably be ok.

Now we're waiting on rods so machine work can be done and bearings (ACL race) can be ordered.
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 09:44 PM
  #36  
doward's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,608
Total Cats: 817
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by Oscar
If I were to coat them, deleting the squirters would probably be ok.
I keep coming back to this myself.

I just pulled my motor out to fix my oil leaks(wrong RTV) and ordered the IJ crank scraper and was debating plugging mine. Non coated pistons and still an idea in the back of my head that i might boost it, someday, swayed me to keep them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
Apr 21, 2016 03:00 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
Aroundcorner
Miata parts for sale/trade
2
Oct 1, 2015 03:20 PM
JesseTheNoob
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
Sep 30, 2015 02:44 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 AM.