Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

To suck or not to suck...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 04:12 PM
  #1  
IcantDo55's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,010
Total Cats: 52
From: VA Beach
Default To suck or not to suck...

So building a fuel system for the MSM, (EFR 6758 350whp goal) going to put fuel regulator in back of car. Do I need to have a vacuum line on it? It will MS tuned so can you just tune around the fuel boost reference fuel pressure increase or not?

Thoughts...
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 04:19 PM
  #2  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Are you converting to return-style? it would be foolish to put in a regulator and convert to return style and not reference it. Really foolish.
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 04:28 PM
  #3  
IcantDo55's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,010
Total Cats: 52
From: VA Beach
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Are you converting to return-style? it would be foolish to put in a regulator and convert to return style and not reference it. Really foolish.

Yes return style, but regulator in back of car. Foolish, ok. But school me, why?
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 04:32 PM
  #4  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Because as your boost builds you need to build fuel pressure too otherwise you'll run out of fuel for no good reason.
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 04:50 PM
  #5  
julio's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 130
Total Cats: 23
Default

Also planning my fuel system for MSM EFR swap and was thinking the rear mount regulator might be a bad idea since the vacuum line would have to be so long if you want it referenced. I'd think that would slow down signal changes even with a very solid vacuum line and a lot more line to possibly get damaged and pretty sure you don't want that if you are using a referenced fuel regulator. In for more info...
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 05:10 PM
  #6  
IcantDo55's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,010
Total Cats: 52
From: VA Beach
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Because as your boost builds you need to build fuel pressure too otherwise you'll run out of fuel for no good reason.
Lets say your pump is big enough and the base pressure is high enough that is does not dip even with the injectors pulse with 100% what would it matter?

You would tune for a static, lets say 50 PSI of fuel pressure. How would that be bad? Only thing I could imagine is that the manifold pressure is now at 20psi making the fuel pressure effectively 30psi..........maybe your on to something. So base 60? IDK
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 05:17 PM
  #7  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by IcantDo55
Yes return style, but regulator in back of car. Foolish, ok. But school me, why?
Foolish for a few reasons

In the front, the regulator acts as a damper, and you loose that affect in the back. This is a big thing.

The regulator will be less effective in the back, since it can't correct for the pressure drop after the regulator in the hose between the injectors and the regulator. You just made that hose 10' long instead of 3' long. So you'll get less pressure to the injectors the more you flow.

You need the vacuum reference. It will improve idle, and improve fuel delivery in boost. It keeps the pressure delta between the injectors and the intake manifold constant. Improves flow A LOT when you go in boost vs no regulator.

There's no downsides to putting it up front, so do that.
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 05:18 PM
  #8  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by IcantDo55
Lets say your pump is big enough and the base pressure is high enough that is does not dip even with the injectors pulse with 100% what would it matter?

You would tune for a static, lets say 50 PSI of fuel pressure. How would that be bad? Only thing I could imagine is that the manifold pressure is now at 20psi making the fuel pressure effectively 30psi..........maybe your on to something. So base 60? IDK
That's exactly it. Your effective pressure would drop no matter what cause you're not pressurizing the other side.
Originally Posted by patsmx5
Foolish for a few reasons

In the front, the regulator acts as a damper, and you loose that affect in the back. This is a big thing.

The regulator will be less effective in the back, since it can't correct for the pressure drop after the regulator in the hose between the injectors and the regulator. You just made that hose 10' long instead of 3' long. So you'll get less pressure to the injectors the more you flow.

You need the vacuum reference. It will improve idle, and improve fuel delivery in boost. It keeps the pressure delta between the injectors and the intake manifold constant. Improves flow A LOT when you go in boost vs no regulator.

There's no downsides to putting it up front, so do that.
correct
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Madjak
Race Prep
25
Jun 3, 2021 09:28 PM
samnavy
Insert BS here
9
Feb 24, 2016 08:51 AM
jaredfigdor
DIY Turbo Discussion
10
Feb 23, 2016 12:54 PM
vteckiller2000
MEGAsquirt
6
Feb 20, 2016 04:36 PM
k24madness
Miata parts for sale/trade
0
Feb 19, 2016 12:36 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 AM.