Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

What Size Exhaust Tubing for how much boost? (1.8)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 04:05 PM
  #21  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

FM 2.5" DP + old (~ 2002) FM 2.5 midpipe & muffler (with ceramic cat) vs FM 2.5" to 3.0" and (current-gen) full 3.0" exhaust:

Different dynos (both the same model of dynapack, tho), and ~ 10 kpa less boost with the new exhaust, which explains the lower torque in the midrange. (sorry, the boost controller isn't as consistent as I wound like). The increased spool and top end is very evident, however.



Sorry about the colors, I blame the dynapack software.

--Ian
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 04:19 PM
  #22  
gesso's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 820
Total Cats: 276
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Faeflora
Very deep though. ***** deep

Originally Posted by Faeflora
a Choad, Short as possible...
So not actually all that deep.
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 05:03 PM
  #23  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by Faeflora
For turbo exhaust you want a Choad

Short as possible and wide as possible.

My 4" isnt that loud. Very deep though. ***** deep
yeah ok.

that's why you said literally the exact opposite multiple times in your threads
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 05:05 PM
  #24  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
FM 2.5" DP + old (~ 2002) FM 2.5 midpipe & muffler (with ceramic cat) vs FM 2.5" to 3.0" and (current-gen) full 3.0" exhaust:

Different dynos (both the same model of dynapack, tho), and ~ 10 kpa less boost with the new exhaust, which explains the lower torque in the midrange. (sorry, the boost controller isn't as consistent as I wound like). The increased spool and top end is very evident, however.

[img]http://www.codrus.com/dyno/agp/ian-power.png[img]

Sorry about the colors, I blame the dynapack software.

--Ian
lol spool

I think you mean flow.

But yeah, that shows the results perfectly: faster spool and more topend flow. And you can easily bump boost in the midrange as well as timing and make way more torque and be less det limited.

This is one of those rare times I agree with Fae: the bigger and the shorter, the better.
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 05:14 PM
  #25  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
yeah ok.

that's why you said literally the exact opposite multiple times in your threads

well fine it is louder than god but loudness increases with the amount of air being pushed through your engine.

I also have a muffler through which you can roll a tennis ball. that enloudens it
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 07:13 PM
  #26  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by Faeflora
I also have a muffler through which you can roll a tennis ball. that enloudens it
Shouldn't that technically "delouden" it?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
Sep 30, 2018 01:09 PM
Corky Bell
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
18
Nov 22, 2016 09:01 PM
JxPhan
Meet and Greet
3
Oct 2, 2015 02:17 AM
Trent
WTB
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:15 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM.