Did someone ever figure out the CLT resistance data for 96-97 cars?
06-11-2008, 10:41 AM
#6
Reply
0
0
06-11-2008, 04:24 PM
#8
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cromwell, Connecticut
Posts: 2,604
Total Cats: 16
YES... random i was lookin for this last night because i realized i never changed mine from the incorrect value... its now in the big diy post
If 96-97: Resistance scale pending. i used the 94-95 values and it seems to be acurate
-4 16150
104 1150
176 330
anyway:
If piggyback with R7: Use 790 for CLT and xxxx for AIT for the bias.
If piggyback without R7: Use 1544 for CLT and xxxx for AIT for the bias.
If standalone: The bias will be 2490 for each.
ill check it against my obd2 scanner later
If 96-97: Resistance scale pending. i used the 94-95 values and it seems to be acurate
-4 16150
104 1150
176 330
anyway:
If piggyback with R7: Use 790 for CLT and xxxx for AIT for the bias.
If piggyback without R7: Use 1544 for CLT and xxxx for AIT for the bias.
If standalone: The bias will be 2490 for each.
ill check it against my obd2 scanner later
Reply
0
0
06-11-2008, 05:58 PM
#11
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
the resistance scales are all the same....it's the BIAS we dont have.............................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ....... 
Reply
0
0
06-12-2008, 02:23 PM
#17
my god, either i am completely blind and missing the post or you guys are confusing each other and me on the way. i read the link sam posted and all i see at the end is him saying that he will follow brain's instructions to figure out his bias. now in this thread sam is saying that the rx7 defaults screwed him so brain's numbers in the other thread were wrong. and brain is saying no theyre correct, it's just the bias we don't have. :( :( plus i don't see any posts by Jerry anywhere!
Reply
0
0
06-12-2008, 04:38 PM
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North of Atlanta
Posts: 78
Total Cats: 0
my god, either i am completely blind and missing the post or you guys are confusing each other and me on the way. i read the link sam posted and all i see at the end is him saying that he will follow brain's instructions to figure out his bias. now in this thread sam is saying that the rx7 defaults screwed him so brain's numbers in the other thread were wrong. and brain is saying no theyre correct, it's just the bias we don't have. :( :( plus i don't see any posts by Jerry anywhere!
Reply
0
0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elesjuan
Build Threads
9
11-14-2018 12:18 PM
Motorsport-Electronics
ECUs and Tuning
0
09-05-2015 08:02 AM
