Notices
Gaming Discuss to your nerdy heart's content

Need new "non-fancy" home computer... kids getting older!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 04:04 PM
  #41  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Girz0r
Noo.... don't do it
The passmark scores on these new 6-core i7s are mind-blowing. My i5-750 benchmarks a 3735, the new 5820K scores a 13004. That's higher than the Xeon in my PC at work!
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 08:10 PM
  #42  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

Good grief...our desktop (which is fairly recent -- i5-3470) scores 6562 with Passmark.
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 08:32 PM
  #43  
Girz0r's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,034
Total Cats: 323
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
The passmark scores on these new 6-core i7s are mind-blowing.
Skylake cpus?
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 09:24 PM
  #44  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Girz0r
Skylake cpus?
Not even. These are Haswell-E (22nm) chips I'm looking at. The Skylakes aren't out in the LGA 2011 package yet, and are still limited to 4 cores + hyperthread, so they barely crack 10000.

Last edited by Joe Perez; Mar 22, 2016 at 10:12 PM. Reason: 2011, not 2100
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 09:26 PM
  #45  
Girz0r's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,034
Total Cats: 323
From: Austin, TX
Default

Interesting...
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 09:31 PM
  #46  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Girz0r
Interesting...
It's a good point, though. Wait until the next-gen Skylake, when they go 6 core in the new socket. That'll push the score up into 13k territory and get you access to silly amounts of DDR4 memory, but without the huge TDP of the Haswell.
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 09:46 PM
  #47  
Girz0r's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,034
Total Cats: 323
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
but without the huge TDP of the Haswell.

TDP is one of the things I actually care about, EFFICIENCY
Old Mar 22, 2016 | 10:22 PM
  #48  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Actually, I'm kind of surprised that the Broadwell (which is the 14nm die-shrink of the Haswell) isn't available in a 6 or 8 core version of the i7 variant. That would really be the chip to have today, since the Skylake doesn't bring much to the table aside from the integrated GPU, which I couldn't care less about. It's got the TDP of a Skylake, with the per-core performance of a Haswell.


Remember back when there was only one version of every major CPU family? You want a 286? Great, what clock speed? Here it is. What socket does it fit in? The rectangular one.

Even the 386s and 486s didn't differ much between the SX and DX variants aside from the FPU and the bus width, so far as I can remember. At least in the desktop versions.

These days, processor names are damn near meaningless. The name "i7" covers everything from a potato to the fastest x86 processors available at any price.




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 PM.