Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

Deleting charcoal canister?

Old Aug 11, 2008 | 11:13 PM
  #21  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

This is what im talking about.

Connect those two lines together?
Attached Thumbnails Deleting charcoal canister?-img_3258-large-.jpg  
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 11:20 PM
  #22  
Trent's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,651
Total Cats: 39
From: Louisiana
Default

no.

there is a line that runs up from the bottom of the canister. you can't see it in that pic. you will disconnect the lines on top (remove the vacuum lines and the solenoid all together) and hook the bigger of the two on the top to the one coming from the bottom.

It'll make more sense once you remove it.

take note though that the hoses going to the canister and from the canister are two different sizes, and you will have to clamp the crap out of one end. I wasn't comfortable with the thought of having any chance for open gasoline vapors that close to my alternator so i pussied out and put the canister back in.
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 11:22 PM
  #23  
RotorNutFD3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,522
Total Cats: 36
From: Newnan, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Doppelgänger
really? I thought I saw one under there way back when i had my NA and changed the fuel filter....

I stand corrected. (But I still want to see what is inside the little canister under the hood)
If I was at home right now, I'd tear mine apart because now I'm curious too. lol

Sam, look at post #9, that's what you'll end up with after you remove the canister and connect the two hard lines together. One of the hoses you'll remove actually fits between the two hard lines really well as it curves almost perfectly to fit. Just slip the clamps onto the hose and connect the hardlines.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 10:13 AM
  #24  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Ok someone mentioned fuel vapors, alternators and exploding.

What are the chances of this?

By connecting the top line and the bottom line, what am I effectively doing? What are the two lines that run into the bottom and into the top? one i know is for manifold vac.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #25  
chucker's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 245
Total Cats: 1
From: santa cruz
Default

Here's an idea-

Just leave the damn thing. 1) It's not in the way (removing it won't make it easier to work on your car), and 2) removing it won't make your car perform any better.

On the other hand, you will waste time three ways: 1) removing it, 2) asking questions about how to remove it, 3) and replacing it for emissions testing.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 10:56 AM
  #26  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

If it doesnt throw CEL's then it really doesnt matter. I'm not gonna replace it.

What I want to do is use its space for WI.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #27  
BenR's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,862
Total Cats: 1
From: ABQ, NM
Default

It won't throw a code unless you disconnect the silenoid as well.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 11:12 AM
  #28  
01TurboMiata's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 336
Total Cats: 0
From: Panama City, FL.
Default

I did what everyone else did with mine, remove it and run the two tubes together with one line. I also decided to get a hack saw and cut it open to see what was inside before I tried to make a catch can out of it. There it a paper filter on top and two on bottom, one being a big circle and the other being a small one that fits inside of the larger one. There is charcoal in there aswell.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #29  
wes65's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,369
Total Cats: -1
From: Southern Indiana
Default

hmm, i capped the lines. Maybe not such a good idea?
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #30  
zoom2zoom's Avatar
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,589
Total Cats: 0
From: SLC, Utah
Default

I just wasted 7 minutes reading this, why couldn't you guys get to the point sooner??!!
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 04:15 PM
  #31  
wes65's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,369
Total Cats: -1
From: Southern Indiana
Default

So, since i capped off the lines, is my gas tank going to pop? I don't notice any excessive pressure when i remove the gas cap.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 04:49 PM
  #32  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

^ No. Most likely its a circulation through the canister. No more canister so it just goes back to wherever it came.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 05:11 PM
  #33  
jim-NA's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 124
Total Cats: 0
From: England
Default

have a look at this....http://www.mx5nutz.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=15120

I followed the instructions, no more big black canister, no problems.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 06:25 PM
  #34  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Brilliant, im tossing mine when I get my new radiator in.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 08:14 PM
  #35  
ChairFaceChippendale's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 0
From: NJ
Default

unless your totally shaving or engine bay or making an all out race car i see no point in removing any part of your evap system.

with as much as people complain about ricers on this forum i'm a little surprised to see this topic come up as often as it does. it's not hurting performance, and it just makes more effort come inspection time.

are people really underhood often enough for it to be in the way on a basis frequent enough to warrant removal?

next are you guys going to take the gas cap off to save weight?

i'm not trying to convince/flame anyone, just ranting i guess. to each his own, but i don't get it.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 08:36 PM
  #36  
coastertrav's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 684
Total Cats: 1
From: Orlando FL - UCF
Default

I'm doing it. Not because it gets in the way, but that we don't have inspections in FL, and I plan on doing a semi wire tuck this fall.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 08:40 PM
  #37  
ChairFaceChippendale's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 0
From: NJ
Default

that i understand, it's just the "doing it to do it" that bothers me i guess.

i'd just as soon spend the time going for a drive.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 08:50 PM
  #38  
Saml01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by ChairFaceChippendale
that i understand, it's just the "doing it to do it" that bothers me i guess.

i'd just as soon spend the time going for a drive.
Im gonna put the water injection pump there, so the space will be well used.

Does that qualify me for approval for removal from you?
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #39  
ChairFaceChippendale's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 0
From: NJ
Default

that depends, where is said water being injected?



please don't answer that question seriously.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #40  
Bryce's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
From: Cypress, TX
Default

I removed my charcoal canister about 6 months ago, and did nothing with the lines. On occasion, fuel will spurt from the bottom line so you definitely need to do something about the bottom line. Capping it would be bad as that is the vent for it.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 PM.