Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

~350hp + factory oil pump + underdrive pulley = .... (not 56k friendly)

Old May 2, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #21  
spike's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,614
Total Cats: 0
From: vancouver canada
Default

Originally Posted by paul
I had long ago read about the issues of underdrive pulleys on a more powerful motor
....and you still decided to run a underdrive pulley?

When I went turbo,the underdrive pulley was the first thing to come off my car.
Old May 2, 2008 | 01:31 PM
  #22  
Stealth97's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 67
From: Canton, Ga
Default

I disagree that the clutch should be balanced with the engine, unless you expect your engine to outlast the clutch.
Old May 2, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #23  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Sarcasm?
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old May 2, 2008 | 01:47 PM
  #24  
Markp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,380
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by paul

I think you might be able to weld that back together.

That's why I spent $400 on a billet EDM'd oil pump.

Mark
Old May 2, 2008 | 01:55 PM
  #25  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
Yes you should. Balance the pieces individually, then balance them as an assembly. With the clutch too if you can.
That's what I was planing on, I might as well do it since it is all gonna be out there anyway.
Here is the real question for us to scratch our heads over.
If you lighten your crank (ie. knifedge*spelling) is it more likely to increase crank flex ,decrease or stay relatively the same. Common sense tells me, less metal=less strength=more flex. But I could be wrong. It is something I've been wanting to do, but I'm starting to change my mind.

Stealth-As far as clutch goes, I'd rather have a balanced assemby to begin with and then go slightly out of balance then have an unbalanced assembly from the start.
High performance OEM cars get their rotating assemblies balanced with the clutch assembly attached, so why wouldn't I?
Old May 2, 2008 | 02:00 PM
  #26  
J.T.'s Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 171
Total Cats: 0
From: Sacramento
Default

Originally Posted by Zabac
That's what I was planing on, I might as well do it since it is all gonna be out there anyway.
Here is the real question for us to scratch our heads over.
If you lighten your crank (ie. knifedge*spelling) is it more likely to increase crank flex ,decrease or stay relatively the same. Common sense tells me, less metal=less strength=more flex. But I could be wrong. It is something I've been wanting to do, but I'm starting to change my mind.
I would think that the metal your taking off is far enough from the centerline that its wieght is being used as leverage against the crank rather than supporting it. But I won't lie, I don't know what I'm talking about when it comes to that, so its just a theory.
Old May 2, 2008 | 02:02 PM
  #27  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

Mark, where did yo get your EDM'd gears? Did you just get a one-off, or from Bill W.?

JT-no it makes sense what you are saying, neither of us here have a clue, it's good to hear other points of view.
Old May 2, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #28  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Dan, when you lighten the crank you take material off in areas that won't (or shouldn't) reduce it's strength. And because the crank is now well balanced, you should suffer less harmonic/imbalance issues.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old May 2, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #29  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

Ben, that's what I was hoping to hear.
Old May 2, 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #30  
Markp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,380
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Zabac
Mark, where did yo get your EDM'd gears? Did you just get a one-off, or from Bill W.?

JT-no it makes sense what you are saying, neither of us here have a clue, it's good to hear other points of view.
Mine was a first gen set from Bill W.
Old May 2, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #31  
paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
How high were you revving this engine?
Do you think redline might be a factor?

soft rev limit is set to 7000 and hard is set to 7200. typically i never rev it out that far, I don't have to. but the car was breaking loose like a ************ in 2nd and raping the rev limiter when it happened.
Old May 2, 2008 | 09:50 PM
  #32  
paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by spike
....and you still decided to run a underdrive pulley?

When I went turbo,the underdrive pulley was the first thing to come off my car.
I was new to the turbo scene and took the advice of 2 people i USED TO respect in that area (OlderGuy and RobR ) and totally ignored the advice of the man that made my car the highest HP 1.8 Miata running the underestimated GT2560R, my boost mentor who I will never doubt again, TurboTim.

evidence here http://www.miatamob.org/speakeasy/in...ic,1741.0.html

jk Bruce.
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #33  
mrtonyg's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 483
Total Cats: -2
From: South Florida
Default

Paul, quick question...were you running without the a/c compressor and bracket bolted up to the block?

I am trying to tie OP failures to something else.

Tony
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #34  
paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

I run no AC compressor and no power steering. My car has 1 belt.
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:18 PM
  #35  
mrtonyg's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 483
Total Cats: -2
From: South Florida
Default

Did you replace the bolt that the arrow is pointing to after taking off the a/c?

The reason I ask is that I have seen many Miatas with this bolt missing after someone removed the a/c.

~350hp + factory oil pump + underdrive pulley = .... (not 56k friendly)-ba-0280377-1.jpg
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:24 PM
  #36  
paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

actually that bolt was not in place. When I originally removed my AC and that godforsaken iron bracket I replaced that bolt. But last summer we put a 99 motor in my car and I noticed when removing it that that bolt was not there.

Whats your theory?
Old May 2, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #37  
mrtonyg's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 483
Total Cats: -2
From: South Florida
Default

Paul, that bolt is the primary support for the left side of the oil pump.

The alternator bolt supports one side and that one supports the other side.

I am thinking that some of these pump failures are caused by that missing bolt. Since the pump is not tightly secured, it starts moving around at high rpm causing the gears to shatter.

Look at the size of the boss on the pump that the bolt fits...that bolt was meant to support the pump!

Try something...when you start putting it back together, tighten all the other bolts up on the pump and leave that one out. Then install that one and notice the clamping force and the movement of the pump.

I have been racing/building Miata engines for a long time, and I have seen this issue many a times.

Tony

Last edited by mrtonyg; May 2, 2008 at 10:45 PM.
Old May 2, 2008 | 11:14 PM
  #38  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

^^^Good observation and good info. I'll keep that in mind for sure.
Old May 2, 2008 | 11:46 PM
  #39  
J.T.'s Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 171
Total Cats: 0
From: Sacramento
Default

Originally Posted by paul
soft rev limit is set to 7000 and hard is set to 7200. typically i never rev it out that far, I don't have to. but the car was breaking loose like a ************ in 2nd and raping the rev limiter when it happened.
Rev limiter rape-age probably did't help lol
Old May 3, 2008 | 07:25 AM
  #40  
paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by mrtonyg
Paul, that bolt is the primary support for the left side of the oil pump.

The alternator bolt supports one side and that one supports the other side.

I am thinking that some of these pump failures are caused by that missing bolt. Since the pump is not tightly secured, it starts moving around at high rpm causing the gears to shatter.

Look at the size of the boss on the pump that the bolt fits...that bolt was meant to support the pump!

Try something...when you start putting it back together, tighten all the other bolts up on the pump and leave that one out. Then install that one and notice the clamping force and the movement of the pump.

I have been racing/building Miata engines for a long time, and I have seen this issue many a times.

Tony
the oil pump had no movement even after ALL the bolts were removed. I had to pry it loose. There was no play.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 PM.