Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

BPs in F1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 11:02 PM
  #1  
curly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,168
Total Cats: 1,393
From: Oregon City, OR
Default BPs in F1?

Woot! Proof that '90-'93s are better than '94s and up.

Technical changes for 2012 will include the use of biomass-derived fuels and tighter suspension regulations. The biggest changes, however, will come in 2013 with the introduction of a new engine formula (see related story), replacing the current 2.4 litre V8s with 1.6 litre four-cylinder units.
http://www.formula1.com/news/headlin.../12/11596.html
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 11:31 PM
  #2  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,384
Total Cats: 7,506
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

“Following dialogue with the engine manufacturers and experts in this field, the power units will be four cylinders, 1.6 litre with high pressure gasoline injection up to 500 bar.”

500 bar = 7,252 PSI.

Huh.


“An additional revision to the 2013 regulations will see a drop in the number of engines at drivers' disposal. Currently they can use eight units a season without penalty, but this will be limited to five in 2013 and reduced to four for subsequent seasons.”

So, 470 hp / litre, and they have to last for more than 1,000 miles each.

This will be interesting.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 11:49 PM
  #3  
curly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,168
Total Cats: 1,393
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

I don't mind too much about the 4 banger, we've been spoiled with V8s and V10s for the past couple years.

But I'm pissed that an F1 engine will be the same size as my Miata's, and only have 5,000 revs more. The 12,000 rev limit is way too low.
Old Dec 10, 2010 | 11:58 PM
  #4  
kotomile's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
From: Monterey, CA
Default

500 bar has to be a typo...
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 12:04 AM
  #5  
emilio700's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,622
Total Cats: 2,619
Default

Originally Posted by kotomile
500 bar has to be a typo...
Probably about right. Current production direct injection passenger car engines with a mere 12~13.0:1 CR run 1500~3000psi. These F1 engines will likely be well above 18:1 CR.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 12:39 AM
  #6  
kotomile's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
From: Monterey, CA
Default

Ugh, my reading comprehension is lacking lately. I was reading that as boost pressure..
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 01:44 AM
  #7  
southernmx5's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 328
Total Cats: 4
From: TN
Default

The 12,000 rpm rev limit may be the end of the pneumatic valve systems too. I imagine the new engines will be more like current wrc units.
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 03:09 AM
  #8  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

In for fancy V-band gadgetry.
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 03:19 AM
  #9  
turotufas's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,304
Total Cats: 7
From: Gainesville,Fl
Default

Race motor variants in production cars...
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 03:52 AM
  #10  
messiahx's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 956
Total Cats: 7
From: Shalimar, FL
Default

They should just be told: 5 engines a year, 1.6 liters, turbocharged, you have x gallons of y fuel. And let the teams do what they please. I think it'd be way more exciting this way. And why the focus on being enviro-friendly? I don't think I'll ever see F1 as a "green" sport. It exists so people can drive fast cars fast.
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 04:36 AM
  #11  
pusha's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,330
Total Cats: -29
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by messiahx
They should just be told: 5 engines a year, 1.6 liters, turbocharged, you have x gallons of y fuel. And let the teams do what they please. I think it'd be way more exciting this way. And why the focus on being enviro-friendly? I don't think I'll ever see F1 as a "green" sport. It exists so people can drive fast cars fast.
I'd kill for an old turbocharged quad-cam Ford Indycar.
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #12  
JKav's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 376
Total Cats: 47
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Probably about right. Current production direct injection passenger car engines with a mere 12~13.0:1 CR run 1500~3000psi.
It's actually nuttier than that -- they run 1800 bar, and 2000 bar (29,000 psi) is becoming the norm.

For commercial diesels, 2500 bar fuel systems are coming in 2012. That's 36,000 psi!
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 04:20 PM
  #13  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,384
Total Cats: 7,506
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by JKav
For commercial diesels, 2500 bar fuel systems are coming in 2012. That's 36,000 psi!
?!

Seriously, 36,000 psi is CNC waterjet territory. How the hell do you not carve a hole in the middle of the piston (or just blow the nozzle of the injector apart) with that?
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 09:02 PM
  #14  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,033
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

The waterjet I ran at my old job was 50k and wouldn't do **** to aluminum without garnet, other than get everything around the tub very very wet.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
patsmx5
Engine Performance
19
May 14, 2015 01:26 PM
Mazdaspeeder
Engine Performance
6
Jan 27, 2015 06:46 PM
cyotani
Miata parts for sale/trade
16
Jun 20, 2014 10:26 AM
dannyb78
MEGAsquirt
10
May 16, 2014 03:57 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM.