Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Computer geeks assemble!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 02:59 PM
  #41  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

I'd go i5, 8gb and the best budget bang for the buck video card. don't bother with quadro unless your work is paying or you can write it off. I haven't built a computer in many years so I'm probably useless when it comes to picking specific models.

And if you were awesome, you'd get an SSD but that might blow your budget. Still, they're reasonably priced if you get a 256 gb for your "working drive" and use the spinning platters for longer term storage.
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 07:05 PM
  #42  
rleete's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,793
Total Cats: 1,341
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Thanks, guy. Props for the advice.

Probably not gonna spring for the SSD. I have half a dozen fast but fairly small (35-65GB) drives I can take from work. Free is good.
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 07:23 PM
  #43  
Mobius's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,469
Total Cats: 365
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

But SSD is sooo good to the battery.
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 07:37 PM
  #44  
rleete's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,793
Total Cats: 1,341
From: Rochester, NY
Default

It's a desktop. My battery is the nuke plant 50 miles away.
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 08:07 PM
  #45  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

You can get a work station graphics card for ~$150 bucks and the last bench mark I saw, work station cards in that price range were kicking the *** of $600 gaming cards on the cad based bench marks. And also, I'm not sure about other programs, but solid works doesnt thread very well. So a 4 ghz dual core will run solid works much faster than a 2.2ghz 4 core assuming everything else about the processors and system is the same. You do want ALL the ram, seriously, ALL the ram. My work computer still ***** a brick on big solid works assemblies and drawings and its an i7, 8gb ram, quadro equipped hp workstation. It is a slower i7 (2.4 ghz 4 core) and I'm sure the crap load of corporate bloatware on it isnt helping.
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 09:08 PM
  #46  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Ram is cheap. It's only $60 for 16GB, so you might as well spring for it if there is any chance you need it.
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 10:11 PM
  #47  
Mobius's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,469
Total Cats: 365
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Srsly. 8gb is so 2007!
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 10:13 PM
  #48  
Mobius's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,469
Total Cats: 365
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Srsly. 8GB is so 2007! You wants all the ram for that. 32gb of fast ram is like $150.
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 10:15 PM
  #49  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

I hate all yall with DDR3. I thought it would be a good idea on the 2nd rebuild of this computer to use an AMD2+ setup because I figured DDR2 was going to get stupidly cheap (DDR3 had just come out at the time), and I was saving money at the moment by using the current AMD2 processor I had.
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 10:24 PM
  #50  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,384
Total Cats: 7,506
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
I thought it would be a good idea on the 2nd rebuild of this computer to use an AMD2+ setup because I figured DDR2 was going to get stupidly cheap
Haha. Yeah, RAM always tends to get cheaper and cheaper over time, right up until the point that the next generation form-factor is released. Once the production lines switch over to the new stuff, the remaining stock of the old parts starts to skyrocket in value.

On the plus side, even DDR2 is still insanely cheap. I can remember forking out well over a hundred bucks to upgrade my Amiga 500 from 512k to 1 meg, and that was back when money was worth something. Hell, when the price of 30 pin SIMMs dropped to $50 a meg (1 meg was achieved with 4 256k sticks) I immediately went out and bought 2 megs worth for my 486, which was a lot of RAM at the time. I remember that day very clearly.

But it's ok. DDR4 will be out in a month or two, so all of us DDR3 crew will be crying soon enough. (Hooray, no more banking requirements!)
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 10:27 PM
  #51  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Haha. Yeah, RAM always tends to get cheaper and cheaper over time, right up until the point that the next generation form-factor is released. Once the production lines switch over to the new stuff, the remaining stock of the old parts starts to skyrocket in value.

On the plus side, even DDR2 is still insanely cheap. I can remember forking out well over a hundred bucks to upgrade my Amiga 500 from 512k to 1 meg, and that was back when money was worth something. Hell, when the price of 30 pin SIMMs dropped to $50 a meg (1 meg was achieved with 4 256k sticks) I immediately went out and bought 2 megs worth for my 486, which was a lot of RAM at the time. I remember that day very clearly.
Alright old man, I'll get off your lawn.
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 10:33 PM
  #52  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,384
Total Cats: 7,506
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Alright old man, I'll get off your lawn.
Attached Thumbnails Computer geeks assemble!-get-off-my-lawn.jpg  
Old Jan 9, 2013 | 11:03 PM
  #53  
Mobius's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,469
Total Cats: 365
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

I love you guyz. No homo.
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 11:20 AM
  #54  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by joe perez
rambus.
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 11:36 AM
  #55  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

I just speced a computer:

i7-3770
16GB of DDR3 1600MHz
2TB 7200RPM drive
32GB SSD for Cache
Radeon HD 7770
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 11:56 AM
  #56  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,384
Total Cats: 7,506
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
rambus.


So true.
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 12:36 PM
  #57  
rleete's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,793
Total Cats: 1,341
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I just speced a computer:

i7-3770
16GB of DDR3 1600MHz
2TB 7200RPM drive
32GB SSD for Cache
Radeon HD 7770
From where and at what price? I'd like to get something like I have at work, but they were well over a grand. Seeing that I'm looking for 2 at once (wife's rig is even older than mine), that's too much for the Braineack in me.
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 01:16 PM
  #58  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Dell put it together for me, it's called the XPS 8500. It should cost the company right around a grand.
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 02:01 PM
  #59  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,384
Total Cats: 7,506
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

When you say "32GB SSD for cache", do you mean you're parking the OS's page file on it?
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 02:07 PM
  #60  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
When you say "32GB SSD for cache", do you mean you're parking the OS's page file on it?

yeah, i believe it's used as a scratch drive. can do 32GB or 256GB.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.