Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

FBI accused of planting backdoor in OpenBSD IPSEC stack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 08:27 PM
  #1  
sixshooter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,157
Total Cats: 3,537
From: Tampa, Florida
Default FBI accused of planting backdoor in OpenBSD IPSEC stack

I have no idea what this actually means, but it seemed important to a geek buddy of mine so I thought I'd share.

What does this mean to Joe everyguy and what does this mean to Joe Perez?

http://arstechnica.com/open-source/n...psec-stack.ars
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 09:19 PM
  #2  
Quality Control Bot's Avatar
"Quality" is my first name.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,598
Total Cats: 77
Default

basically they canon rushed.

Attached Thumbnails FBI accused of planting backdoor in OpenBSD IPSEC stack-canon.jpg  
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 09:28 PM
  #3  
ianferrell's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 613
Total Cats: 3
From: Maumelle, AR
Default

Well... basically, openbsd code has been copied into almost everything out there, since its not under the GNU license. Theoretically this back doors could be in your cell phone or blue ray player. Nothing to see here, move along. (in reality, I doubt that anything remains after 10 years, especially given the audits that occur within openbsd)
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 09:31 PM
  #4  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

IPSec is more or less the protocol that encrypts your packets so that they are secure. Here is an article that says it does not have a backdoor.

Basically if it is true what I understand it does if is gets certain parts of the encryption key so that they can brute force the encryption key quicker.
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 01:28 AM
  #5  
Newbsauce's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,299
Total Cats: 2
From: NoVA
Default

If this really happened 10 years ago I'm wondering if it would still be relevant. Key sizes and algorithms have changed fairly dramatically since then which even makes brute force pretty damn difficult. Just to give you some perspective - the DES standard (used until 2k2) had a 56 bit key, today we use the AES standard in which the smallest key size is 2.5x larger. Even if they escrow bits of of the encryption key they'd still have quite a bit to crack.
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 03:46 AM
  #6  
r808's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 436
Total Cats: 0
From: Makakilo
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
I have no idea what this actually means, but it seemed important to a geek buddy of mine so I thought I'd share.

What does this mean to Joe everyguy and what does this mean to Joe Perez?

http://arstechnica.com/open-source/n...psec-stack.ars
It sort of means Linux and random ----.
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 03:47 AM
  #7  
r808's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 436
Total Cats: 0
From: Makakilo
Default

Originally Posted by Newbsauce
If this really happened 10 years ago I'm wondering if it would still be relevant. Key sizes and algorithms have changed fairly dramatically since then which even makes brute force pretty damn difficult. Just to give you some perspective - the DES standard (used until 2k2) had a 56 bit key, today we use the AES standard in which the smallest key size is 2.5x larger. Even if they escrow bits of of the encryption key they'd still have quite a bit to crack.
DES? If I had a dime for every WEP neighbor. . . Mr. Ubuntu, my directional antenna, and my friend Mr. Kismet disagrees. Good times.
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 07:06 AM
  #8  
gospeed81's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
From: Spring, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Newbsauce
If this really happened 10 years ago I'm wondering if it would still be relevant.
We're only being told now since it's no longer relevant. What we should pay attention to is what HAS happened if this is true over the past 10yrs...and what that may hint at what could be going on now.
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 11:32 AM
  #9  
Newbsauce's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,299
Total Cats: 2
From: NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by r808
DES? If I had a dime for every WEP neighbor. . . Mr. Ubuntu, my directional antenna, and my friend Mr. Kismet disagrees. Good times.
I guess I fail to see your cross reference between WEP and DES. Last time I checked the last attack on DES took 22 hours and something like 100k computers. Comparing WEP cracking to that is like comparing removal of the "butterflies" in the Operation game to actual brain surgery.

Last edited by Newbsauce; Dec 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM.
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 12:51 PM
  #10  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

Who tries to break encryption anymore? MITM attacks are ftw.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gsyk59
Engine Performance
49
Nov 22, 2015 04:11 AM
hustler
Front Desk
98
Dec 28, 2009 08:03 PM
kenzo42
General Miata Chat
22
Jul 17, 2009 12:29 PM
ray_sir_6
Insert BS here
18
Oct 1, 2008 12:36 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM.