First Drive
#1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
First Drive
For those that don't read build threads, especially year-long ones that never seem to end, a milestone first real drive tonight. I say real as in not driving it onto the trailer for paint while sitting on a bucket and holding the steering column up. Only went five miles but it was dark and I had no dash lights, gauges or turn signals, let alone plates or insurance so I didn't want to push it. Oh, and probably 5* positive camber on the RF tire. Everything just got bolted on and eyeballed. Going for an alignment next.
Nothing fell off, and I made it uneventfully. Some pics of the big day. The car is a mess. Been sitting in the shop for months since paint, let alone all of the new dust on the rear from my gravel road so it is very dirty.
After alignment I want to get a few drives on the clutch and then off to the dyno for tuning. It has a rough canned tune but it is pig rich.
Anyway, I'm happy.
Nothing fell off, and I made it uneventfully. Some pics of the big day. The car is a mess. Been sitting in the shop for months since paint, let alone all of the new dust on the rear from my gravel road so it is very dirty.
After alignment I want to get a few drives on the clutch and then off to the dyno for tuning. It has a rough canned tune but it is pig rich.
Anyway, I'm happy.
#5
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
Nope. Scratch build. Fabbed my own front and rear subframes by heavily modifying the stock ones to work, modified the rear control arms to clear the CV joints, new trans mount, TIG welded 2 1/2" primaries dumping into 3" exhaust, everything. There was zero kit parts used in this build.
#13
I think the block splitting only happens with certain generations of the 5.0 blocks that had high nickel levels but I'm not sure... Anyone have any info on that? I've seen a few that have much higher output than 450 hp and run reliably but I have seen a few of them that separate too.
Not that this is a 5.0 forum, just curious.
Not that this is a 5.0 forum, just curious.
#16
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
Ease of fit mainly. Heck, my headers drop in from the top, lol. That, and because I was going to fab everything myself and there were others out there to look at for hints. The front distributor makes the fit easier as well.
#18
Slowest Progress Ever
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,025
Total Cats: 304
I love this build for so many reasons...
1) It's an NB. Most don't know this, but there is a lot of differences between an NA and an NB as far as a V8 swap.
2) So many things are custom fabbed, it really brings to reality the term "if you put your mind to it, you can accomplish great things".
3) I always said "If I did a V8 swap, it would only be a GM LS engine." This build makes me think twice about that.
Fantastic Job!
1) It's an NB. Most don't know this, but there is a lot of differences between an NA and an NB as far as a V8 swap.
2) So many things are custom fabbed, it really brings to reality the term "if you put your mind to it, you can accomplish great things".
3) I always said "If I did a V8 swap, it would only be a GM LS engine." This build makes me think twice about that.
Fantastic Job!