Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Insert BS here (https://www.miataturbo.net/insert-bs-here-4/)
-   -   how ignorant are people?? (https://www.miataturbo.net/insert-bs-here-4/how-ignorant-people-39805/)

zoomin 10-03-2009 01:52 AM

how ignorant are people??
 
It's pretty sad when American "adults" don't even know the proper use of "should have" or "would have/would've". Who the heck started this pathetic use of "should of" and "would of"? Is it the schools or are people really just that freaking retarded??!! I know immigrants that are more intelligent. Okay, rant off.

Bond 10-03-2009 02:02 AM

Your ignorant for not capatilizing the thread title.

kenzo42 10-03-2009 02:05 AM


Originally Posted by zoomin (Post 462984)
It's pretty sad when American "adults" don't even know the proper use of "should have" or "would have/would've". Who the heck started this pathetic use of "should of" and "would of"? Is it the schools or are people really just that freaking retarded??!! I know immigrants that are more intelligent. Okay, rant off.

So you're insinuating that immigrants are stupid. What correlation is there w/ being an immigrant and lack of intelligence?

How ironic this thread is.

zoomin 10-03-2009 02:10 AM


Originally Posted by kenzo42 (Post 462991)
So you're insinuating that immigrants are stupid. What correlation is there w/ being an immigrant and lack of intelligence?

How ironic this thread is.

Actually, I was implying that I know immigrants who have a better grasp on the English language than some "Americans" choose to exhibit. That would be insinuating they are more intelligent, not stupid. Did you even read and comprehend correctly?

curly 10-03-2009 02:18 AM


Originally Posted by Bond (Post 462988)
Your ignorant for not capatilizing the thread title.

Yes, YOU'RE ignorant for not CAPITALIZING the thread title.

I've been both surprised and saddened when firefox or word puts a red line under a word I type. Mistakes happen, but I consider myself a decent speller and would like to keep that opinion of myself.

Let's not get into a pissing contest, it was stated that this was a rant kenzo42, so don't get too mad, and zoomin, if the rant is indeed off, don't insult him.

kenzo42 10-03-2009 02:34 AM


Originally Posted by zoomin (Post 462992)
Actually, I was implying that I know immigrants who have a better grasp on the English language than some "Americans" choose to exhibit. That would be insinuating they are more intelligent, not stupid. Did you even read and comprehend correctly?

First of all, quotes aren't used for emphasis, so go back to school.
Secondly, b/c an immigrant has better grammar over a native speaker doesn't necessarily mean he/she is more intelligent. Education more than likely dictates this.

Regardless, this is a stupid thread.

curly 10-03-2009 02:40 AM


Originally Posted by kenzo42 (Post 462998)
this is a stupid thread.

Forget what I said, this is what I wanna say.

kenzo42 10-03-2009 02:46 AM


Originally Posted by curly (Post 463001)
Forget what I said, this is what I wanna say.

Lol. Agreed.

No more from me.

jayc72 10-03-2009 02:47 AM

Have we run out of things to be bitchy about? Grammar? Really?

mazda/nissan 10-03-2009 04:29 AM

well grammar is an outward projection of one's intelligence, so yes I would say intelligence dictates a proper use of grammar

rmcelwee 10-03-2009 05:36 AM


Originally Posted by mazda/nissan (Post 463006)
well grammar is an outward projection of one's intelligence, so yes I would say intelligence dictates a proper use of grammar

Grammar is an outward projection of one's intelligence. I say intelligence dictates a proper use of grammar.



I misspell shit, cuss all the time, and end sentences with prepositions. I'm also smart as hell but don't think I need to act a certain way in order to please people. If they can't handle it they can kiss my ass. People should be judged on their actions (how they treat others, etc) not how they talk or write. We have a holier than thou type at work that raised hell the other day when someone said "Holy Shit". Come on, did it really hurt anyone to say that? She spent the rest of the day giving people the evil eye and moping. IMHO, her actions where 1000x worse than someone uttering that phrase. People need to get back to what is important. Just my $.02

FWIW, I don't think I have ever seen anyone write "would of". It sounds like it when they are saying "would've" but I am not sure I have seen it written in that way. In any event, it doesn't bother me in the least. THIS bothers me:

NRA-ILA :: Supreme Court to Hear Monumental Second Amendment Case: <I>McDonald</I> v. <I>Chicago</I>

fahrvergnugen 10-04-2009 11:50 AM


Originally Posted by mazda/nissan (Post 463006)
well grammar is an outward projection of one's intelligence, so yes I would say intelligence dictates a proper use of grammar


It is an outward projection of how well they use it, that's it. Now, a lack of capitalization, well, that demonstrates a small penis.

nicacus 10-04-2009 12:13 PM


Originally Posted by fahrvergnugen (Post 463359)
It is an outward projection of how well they use it, that's it. Now, a lack of capitalization, well, that demonstrates a small penis.

IF THAT IS THE CASE I SHOULD ALWAYS TYPE IN CAPS!

Just sayin..

magnamx-5 10-04-2009 01:15 PM


Originally Posted by rmcelwee (Post 463009)
Grammar is an outward projection of one's intelligence. I say intelligence dictates a proper use of grammar.



I misspell shit, cuss all the time, and end sentences with prepositions. I'm also smart as hell but don't think I need to act a certain way in order to please people. If they can't handle it they can kiss my ass. People should be judged on their actions (how they treat others, etc) not how they talk or write. We have a holier than thou type at work that raised hell the other day when someone said "Holy Shit". Come on, did it really hurt anyone to say that? She spent the rest of the day giving people the evil eye and moping. IMHO, her actions where 1000x worse than someone uttering that phrase. People need to get back to what is important. Just my $.02

FWIW, I don't think I have ever seen anyone write "would of". It sounds like it when they are saying "would've" but I am not sure I have seen it written in that way. In any event, it doesn't bother me in the least. THIS bothers me:

NRA-ILA :: Supreme Court to Hear Monumental Second Amendment Case: <I>McDonald</I> v. <I>Chicago</I>

RM as usual we agree i would of been surprised if i did'nt not agree with you :magna:

buffon01 10-04-2009 01:48 PM


Originally Posted by magnamx-5 (Post 463377)
RM as usual we agree; I would've been surprised if I didn't agree with you. :magna:

Fixed. Magna FTW!

cueball1 10-04-2009 03:44 PM

How would you pronounce should've or would've if not as "should of" or "would of"? Contractions are accepted grammatically in the English language in both written and spoken forms. It's shoudda (sic) and wouldda (sic) that are incorrect usage.

Savington 10-04-2009 03:51 PM

This thread are gonna bee a hunnypott..

magnamx-5 10-04-2009 08:12 PM


Originally Posted by buffon01 (Post 463388)
Fixed. Magna FTW!

I did that on purpose double negatives etc aren't the worst thing in the world man.

fahrvergnugen 10-04-2009 08:21 PM


Originally Posted by nicacus (Post 463363)
IF THAT IS THE CASE I SHOULD ALWAYS TYPE IN CAPS!

Just sayin..


You don't drive an F450 with a 12" lift too, do you? :giggle:

nicacus 10-04-2009 08:58 PM


Originally Posted by fahrvergnugen (Post 463537)
You don't drive an F450 with a 12" lift too, do you? :giggle:

Only on the weekends when I feel like taking your mom out :giggle:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands