Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

how ignorant are people??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 01:52 AM
  #1  
zoomin's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,296
Total Cats: 0
From: where most people are Utarded
Default how ignorant are people??

It's pretty sad when American "adults" don't even know the proper use of "should have" or "would have/would've". Who the heck started this pathetic use of "should of" and "would of"? Is it the schools or are people really just that freaking retarded??!! I know immigrants that are more intelligent. Okay, rant off.
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 02:02 AM
  #2  
Bond's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Default

Your ignorant for not capatilizing the thread title.
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 02:05 AM
  #3  
kenzo42's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,017
Total Cats: 13
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by zoomin
It's pretty sad when American "adults" don't even know the proper use of "should have" or "would have/would've". Who the heck started this pathetic use of "should of" and "would of"? Is it the schools or are people really just that freaking retarded??!! I know immigrants that are more intelligent. Okay, rant off.
So you're insinuating that immigrants are stupid. What correlation is there w/ being an immigrant and lack of intelligence?

How ironic this thread is.
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 02:10 AM
  #4  
zoomin's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,296
Total Cats: 0
From: where most people are Utarded
Default

Originally Posted by kenzo42
So you're insinuating that immigrants are stupid. What correlation is there w/ being an immigrant and lack of intelligence?

How ironic this thread is.
Actually, I was implying that I know immigrants who have a better grasp on the English language than some "Americans" choose to exhibit. That would be insinuating they are more intelligent, not stupid. Did you even read and comprehend correctly?
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 02:18 AM
  #5  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,197
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
Your ignorant for not capatilizing the thread title.
Yes, YOU'RE ignorant for not CAPITALIZING the thread title.

I've been both surprised and saddened when firefox or word puts a red line under a word I type. Mistakes happen, but I consider myself a decent speller and would like to keep that opinion of myself.

Let's not get into a pissing contest, it was stated that this was a rant kenzo42, so don't get too mad, and zoomin, if the rant is indeed off, don't insult him.
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 02:34 AM
  #6  
kenzo42's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,017
Total Cats: 13
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by zoomin
Actually, I was implying that I know immigrants who have a better grasp on the English language than some "Americans" choose to exhibit. That would be insinuating they are more intelligent, not stupid. Did you even read and comprehend correctly?
First of all, quotes aren't used for emphasis, so go back to school.
Secondly, b/c an immigrant has better grammar over a native speaker doesn't necessarily mean he/she is more intelligent. Education more than likely dictates this.

Regardless, this is a stupid thread.

Last edited by kenzo42; Oct 3, 2009 at 04:33 AM.
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 02:40 AM
  #7  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,197
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Originally Posted by kenzo42
this is a stupid thread.
Forget what I said, this is what I wanna say.
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 02:46 AM
  #8  
kenzo42's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,017
Total Cats: 13
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by curly
Forget what I said, this is what I wanna say.
Lol. Agreed.

No more from me.
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 02:47 AM
  #9  
jayc72's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Have we run out of things to be bitchy about? Grammar? Really?
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 04:29 AM
  #10  
mazda/nissan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,075
Total Cats: 0
From: Lexington, SC
Default

well grammar is an outward projection of one's intelligence, so yes I would say intelligence dictates a proper use of grammar
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 05:36 AM
  #11  
rmcelwee's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,038
Total Cats: 27
From: Pikeville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by mazda/nissan
well grammar is an outward projection of one's intelligence, so yes I would say intelligence dictates a proper use of grammar
Grammar is an outward projection of one's intelligence. I say intelligence dictates a proper use of grammar.



I misspell ****, cuss all the time, and end sentences with prepositions. I'm also smart as hell but don't think I need to act a certain way in order to please people. If they can't handle it they can kiss my ***. People should be judged on their actions (how they treat others, etc) not how they talk or write. We have a holier than thou type at work that raised hell the other day when someone said "Holy ****". Come on, did it really hurt anyone to say that? She spent the rest of the day giving people the evil eye and moping. IMHO, her actions where 1000x worse than someone uttering that phrase. People need to get back to what is important. Just my $.02

FWIW, I don't think I have ever seen anyone write "would of". It sounds like it when they are saying "would've" but I am not sure I have seen it written in that way. In any event, it doesn't bother me in the least. THIS bothers me:

NRA-ILA :: Supreme Court to Hear Monumental Second Amendment Case: <I>McDonald</I> v. <I>Chicago</I>
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 11:50 AM
  #12  
fahrvergnugen's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 263
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mazda/nissan
well grammar is an outward projection of one's intelligence, so yes I would say intelligence dictates a proper use of grammar

It is an outward projection of how well they use it, that's it. Now, a lack of capitalization, well, that demonstrates a small *****.
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 12:13 PM
  #13  
nicacus's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,126
Total Cats: 0
From: SLC UT
Default

Originally Posted by fahrvergnugen
It is an outward projection of how well they use it, that's it. Now, a lack of capitalization, well, that demonstrates a small *****.
IF THAT IS THE CASE I SHOULD ALWAYS TYPE IN CAPS!

Just sayin..
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 01:15 PM
  #14  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

Originally Posted by rmcelwee
Grammar is an outward projection of one's intelligence. I say intelligence dictates a proper use of grammar.



I misspell ****, cuss all the time, and end sentences with prepositions. I'm also smart as hell but don't think I need to act a certain way in order to please people. If they can't handle it they can kiss my ***. People should be judged on their actions (how they treat others, etc) not how they talk or write. We have a holier than thou type at work that raised hell the other day when someone said "Holy ****". Come on, did it really hurt anyone to say that? She spent the rest of the day giving people the evil eye and moping. IMHO, her actions where 1000x worse than someone uttering that phrase. People need to get back to what is important. Just my $.02

FWIW, I don't think I have ever seen anyone write "would of". It sounds like it when they are saying "would've" but I am not sure I have seen it written in that way. In any event, it doesn't bother me in the least. THIS bothers me:

NRA-ILA :: Supreme Court to Hear Monumental Second Amendment Case: <I>McDonald</I> v. <I>Chicago</I>
RM as usual we agree i would of been surprised if i did'nt not agree with you
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 01:48 PM
  #15  
buffon01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by magnamx-5
RM as usual we agree; I would've been surprised if I didn't agree with you.
Fixed. Magna FTW!
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 03:44 PM
  #16  
cueball1's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,875
Total Cats: 2
From: Tigard, Oregon
Default

How would you pronounce should've or would've if not as "should of" or "would of"? Contractions are accepted grammatically in the English language in both written and spoken forms. It's shoudda (sic) and wouldda (sic) that are incorrect usage.
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 03:51 PM
  #17  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

This thread are gonna bee a hunnypott..
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 08:12 PM
  #18  
magnamx-5's Avatar
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
From: nowhere
Default

Originally Posted by buffon01
Fixed. Magna FTW!
I did that on purpose double negatives etc aren't the worst thing in the world man.
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 08:21 PM
  #19  
fahrvergnugen's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 263
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nicacus
IF THAT IS THE CASE I SHOULD ALWAYS TYPE IN CAPS!

Just sayin..

You don't drive an F450 with a 12" lift too, do you?
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 08:58 PM
  #20  
nicacus's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,126
Total Cats: 0
From: SLC UT
Default

Originally Posted by fahrvergnugen
You don't drive an F450 with a 12" lift too, do you?
Only on the weekends when I feel like taking your mom out



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 PM.