![]() |
|
Originally Posted by good2go
(Post 1271043)
I think it's the rainfall totals that are going to be the bigger issue. They're saying 5-8" inches over a large area, with 8-12" possible with a direct hit. That's a lot of water to deal with in a 48 hour period.
"The worst hit areas saw more than 24 inches in Mount Pleasant, nearly 20 inches in areas around Charleston and more than 18 inches in the Gills Creek area of Columbia SC" ... with much more rain is still expected to fall until Tuesday. |
96 :ne: 2d :vash:
|
Originally Posted by Girz0r
(Post 1272201)
96 :ne: 2d :vash:
|
Originally Posted by good2go
(Post 1272240)
^^ What's this pertaining to? :confused: :dunno:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Frederiksborg |
Originally Posted by good2go
(Post 1272240)
^^ What's this pertaining to? :confused: :dunno:
|
Interesting short read on a car related subject. Funny how every time I've watched a middle east ISIS related news clip I've thought about the brand in it.
Japan?s Largest Company Is ISIS? Car Maker of Choice | The Diplomat |
Originally Posted by bahurd
(Post 1273234)
Interesting short read on a car related subject. Funny how every time I've watched a middle east ISIS related news clip I've thought about the brand in it.
Japan?s Largest Company Is ISIS? Car Maker of Choice | The Diplomat |
Originally Posted by bahurd
(Post 1273234)
Interesting short read on a car related subject. Funny how every time I've watched a middle east ISIS related news clip I've thought about the brand in it.
Japan?s Largest Company Is ISIS? Car Maker of Choice | The Diplomat |
Not to mention the fact that Toyota kept making those trucks long after they were discontinued in the US.
Maybe I'll put a turret on Don... |
Originally Posted by Monk
(Post 1273278)
Not to mention the fact that Toyota kept making those trucks long after they were discontinued in the US.
--Ian |
Originally Posted by shuiend
(Post 1273274)
I don't understand why people are upset with Toyota, for ISIS using their trucks. Most of the pictures I have seen are old beat up pickups. Toyota didn't go out of their way to sell to ISIS. Old Toyota pickups are just easy to work on and reliable, so they just naturally end up in third world countries. ISIS probably just stole them all as they have conquered territory.
What I'm baffled about though is with all the computerization of vehicles and weapon systems why don't they just put a remote destruct circuit in stuff. Bad guys steal your tanks... Oh well, doesn't work anymore. |
Originally Posted by bahurd
(Post 1273376)
I could care less what brand of truck they use. Personally, I think it's a damn innovative way to weaponize something.
What I'm baffled about though is with all the computerization of vehicles and weapon systems why don't they just put a remote destruct circuit in stuff. Bad guys steal your tanks... Oh well, doesn't work anymore. --Ian |
During my military years (05-10), I was a crewchief on the most technologically advanced version of the MH60 at that time.
Part of the protocol for crash landing in enemy territory was to take the crash axe to the computers and monitors after impact. |
But how much could you actually destroy with just an axe? Seems like there would be a lot left over.
|
Originally Posted by codrus
(Post 1273403)
If you have a remote destruct then it sucks when the bad guys steal the remote destruct code. :)
--Ian Maybe we could ask Volkswagen for help with the software... They made it a few years. |
I just came here to say I am way proud of my domestic shorthair. Someone let her out of the house yesterday and when I went to let her in she spied a mouse about to run into the house. She caught in about four seconds which was impressive to me because she is declawed.
|
Why not just make critical hardware require the periodic entry of a validation "key" to continue operating (avoid crippling). The period could be adjusted to suit the vulnerability.
|
Originally Posted by good2go
(Post 1273485)
Why not just make critical hardware require the periodic entry of a validation "key" to continue operating (avoid crippling). The period could be adjusted to suit the vulnerability.
|
Originally Posted by aidandj
(Post 1273408)
But how much could you actually destroy with just an axe? Seems like there would be a lot left over.
|
Originally Posted by good2go
(Post 1273485)
Why not just make critical hardware require the periodic entry of a validation "key" to continue operating (avoid crippling). The period could be adjusted to suit the vulnerability.
Regardless of the "laws" of the system, it's still barely controlled chaos. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:38 AM. |
|
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands