yeah, but the power/efficiency of the 3MZ-FE or the 1MZ-FE is just too big of a draw over a 4 cyl. toughest part will be finding a Mr2 turbo transmission with the build in LSD.
|
... 3sgte :) better than the camry swap haha, i will continue to post this until accept it.
|
but the 3sgte has nowhere near the torque, and weighs the same amount, wheres the advantage?
|
Originally Posted by Dow.tom
(Post 179449)
... 3sgte :) better than the camry swap haha, i will continue to post this until accept it.
if you turbo the v6 however... the ball game changes :-) |
but i'm wanting something that is reliable which means i'm keeping it relatively stock. Comparing stock numbers i do believe the v6's win
|
depends which one you compare with.
if you take a modern 3sgte it wins on hp by a significant amount, and loses on torque by a little bit. add just 2psi of boost extra, and it will win on both and be factory reliable. the truth of the 3sgte is that the ct26 found on them is totally crap. if fitted with a decent turbo and some good manifolds, it could walk on the v6 with good reliability. plus upgrades are easy as pie with a mild turbo setup. just unmild it. its a personal choice thing. if you cam up the v6 somewhat out of 'fe' emissions/econo spec it would be a lovely thing i'm sure. i just have this unrealistic expectation for all NA engines to make 100hp per litre. if they dont, they fall short. the bare minimum is 75/l which those engines struggle to meet. they are built to pull wagons around :-) if you like torque, go for it. engine swaps are a personal thing anyway. whats best for me isnt for you no doubt. do what makes you happy! if not, you'll regret it anyway. |
|
Originally Posted by rb26dett
(Post 179474)
depends which one you compare with.
if you take a modern 3sgte it wins on hp by a significant amount, and loses on torque by a little bit. add just 2psi of boost extra, and it will win on both and be factory reliable. the truth of the 3sgte is that the ct26 found on them is totally crap. if fitted with a decent turbo and some good manifolds, it could walk on the v6 with good reliability. plus upgrades are easy as pie with a mild turbo setup. just unmild it. its a personal choice thing. if you cam up the v6 somewhat out of 'fe' emissions/econo spec it would be a lovely thing i'm sure. i just have this unrealistic expectation for all NA engines to make 100hp per litre. if they dont, they fall short. the bare minimum is 75/l which those engines struggle to meet. they are built to pull wagons around :-) if you like torque, go for it. engine swaps are a personal thing anyway. whats best for me isnt for you no doubt. do what makes you happy! if not, you'll regret it anyway. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands