Need some computer hardware help
For work purposes I decided to buy another monitor and dual arm stand to make life a little easier. Today the 2nd monitor came so I hooked everything up and its tits on biscuit, with just one minor problem.
Having the one monitor on my DVI cable, and the other on a VGA cable makes enough of a difference that it'll drive me crazy. I checked online and I see they sell dual DVI video cards, but I'm not sure what I'm looking for. Currently I have a ATI Radeon X1300/X1550 Series adapter, VGA cable to a Samsung 2333sw, and DVI cable to another 2333sw monitor. I'm not too computer literate, so I don't know what details are needed so I'll list everything it says. Chip type: ATI Radeon Graphics Processor (0x7183) DAC type: Internal DAC (400MHz) Adapter string: Radeon X1300/X1550 Series Bios Information: 113-A67626-103 Total available Graphics memory: 1534 MB Dedicated Video memory: 256 MB I found this on ebay and I figured for $10 I really cant go wrong, but I wanted to ask first. http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-ATI-Radeon-X...item519588cabb Basically I want both monitors to run through a DVI cable, but I don't want to sacrifice any other performance aspects of a video card. I have no idea what I'm talking about BTW. I just assume going from a 256 MB card to a 128 MB card would be a bad idea. Yes, no? |
Analog VGA connections are terrible. Yes, you want dual DVI, but you need to make sure the card will fit. Verify you have a PCI-Express x16 slot (looks similar in length to all the other slots but is offset a bit) before you buy anything. Your current card may already occupy the slot or you may have onboard video. Also make sure you can fit a full height card... some of the newer mini-desktops only accept low-profile cards.
Judging by the current card, you probably don't play games, so just about any dual-DVI or HDMI+DVI card will do. I'd get something from NewEgg over an eBay seller, but for $10 it's worth a shot. I can't stand cards with fans though. This is $25 after rebate and is ~2x as powerful as what you were looking at. HDMI->DVI cables are ~$5 from Monoprice. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814102817 This site can give you a decent comparison between cards: http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/mid_range_gpus.html Have a photo of the innards? That would help to identify what you need... |
+1 Deltu. Basically if you are not playing games or doing any video editing the 128/256/512/1g thing on video cards means nothing to you.
Basically get the cheapest card with dual DVI output that will fit in your motherboard. |
as someone who regularly hooks up multiple displays via whatever is available, your problem isn't the VGA signal. It's something else.
|
I use VGA and DVI side by side and I can't tell a difference.
|
^ +1
|
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 646164)
as someone who regularly hooks up multiple displays via whatever is available, your problem isn't the VGA signal. It's something else.
Originally Posted by jayc72
(Post 646192)
I use VGA and DVI side by side and I can't tell a difference.
Originally Posted by RyanRaduechel
(Post 646200)
^ +1
Both monitors behave the same even when I switch the cables. HDMI and its HD quality. VGA and its still good, but not nearly as crisp and clear. I guess I'll buy that $10 card and just try it. I don't want to remove the one that's in there until I have one to replace it with. Video editing is still kinda important to me though, so would going from a 256 MB to a 128 MB make a big difference? I don't play games on here, so that's not an issue. Thanks guys. |
whats the difference in price between a 256 card and a 128 card?
|
Originally Posted by RyanRaduechel
(Post 646394)
whats the difference in price between a 256 card and a 128 card?
BTW, I meant DVI cables in that last post, not HDMI. I'm high from painting a basement floor with epoxy sealer with those paint chips sprinkled in them. |
HDMI and DVI are identical in regards to video. The differences are HDMI supports sound and the plugs are different. But can be interchangeable, with the right adapter of course. I am not sure about video editing, or the memory required to do it. I run two 8800 GTS in SLI that are 512 a piece. But I do alot of gaming. Wish I had Windows 7 with DX11 though, what exactly do you have to run for video editing?
|
Honestly, the amount of RAM on the video card isn't a big deal if you're not playing Medal of Honour or whatever the latest FPS drek to be labeled awesome is. The best videogame in the world runs fine in 64k.
Interesting the VGA/DVI dilemma. I've run in this mode on a couple of different machines using a pair of cheap HANNS-G 19" monitors. Apart from needing to tweak the color/brightnss/contrast to achieve a satisfactory match I've never really been bothered by it. |
Originally Posted by Vashthestampede
(Post 646386)
Both monitors behave the same even when I switch the cables. HDMI and its HD quality. VGA and its still good, but not nearly as crisp and clear.
|
Originally Posted by Vashthestampede
(Post 646386)
Both monitors behave the same even when I switch the cables. HDMI and its HD quality. VGA and its still good, but not nearly as crisp and clear.
I guess I'll buy that $10 card and just try it. I don't want to remove the one that's in there until I have one to replace it with. Video editing is still kinda important to me though, so would going from a 256 MB to a 128 MB make a big difference? I don't play games on here, so that's not an issue. Thanks guys. You apparently can tell the difference, so for $10, why not? Just make sure that it *looks* like you have the right slot before you buy it--you don't want a square peg for a round hole. You don't have to pull the current card out to tell. As far as video editing and card memory, it depends on if your software is hardware accelerated. I think Photoshop (yes, images, I know) has this ability in recent versions, but I'm not familiar with video SW. If you're using non-accelerated software, it shouldn't matter. For nVidia's PureVideo or VDPAU (hardware acceleration for playing HD video), you definitely need 256mb if not 512mb. I'm not familiar with ATI versions of this though. |
Switched from VGA to DVI on my 22" LG. Couldn't tell a difference, video card is an NVidia Quadro 570M.
|
Originally Posted by delturcious
(Post 646745)
Some people can tell the difference, some people can't. I definitely can on my monitors. I believe that the quality of your VGA cable also has something to do with it since copper wires collect interference, but if (for whatever reason) someone can't tell the difference between DVI and VGA connections on your monitor, there's no reason to bother with digital.
You apparently can tell the difference, so for $10, why not? Just make sure that it *looks* like you have the right slot before you buy it--you don't want a square peg for a round hole. You don't have to pull the current card out to tell. As far as video editing and card memory, it depends on if your software is hardware accelerated. I think Photoshop (yes, images, I know) has this ability in recent versions, but I'm not familiar with video SW. If you're using non-accelerated software, it shouldn't matter. For nVidia's PureVideo or VDPAU (hardware acceleration for playing HD video), you definitely need 256mb if not 512mb. I'm not familiar with ATI versions of this though. I want dual DVI connections, but I'd rather not downgrade the memory. So maybe its worth it to spend a little more money to have a dual DVI, with at least the same 256 MB or more? Once I find out what kind of card it takes, I assume I can upgrade to any brand card, long as it fits? I have to be honest....since setting up the 2nd monitor, I've really only been using the main one. Although, I haven't done any ebay related work since then, so I really haven't needed to yet. I'll see how well it works today I guess. :) |
Originally Posted by Vashthestampede
(Post 646754)
Is there any way I can find out that information other than opening the case?
Once I find out what kind of card it takes, I assume I can upgrade to any brand card, long as it fits? |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 646782)
Go to Crucial.com and run their system scan tool. This will tell you the mfg and model of your motherboard. Then go and download the manual for your motherboard from the manufacturer.
Yup. Figure out which video card slot your motherboard has (both physical and electrical) and any card that meets that spec should work in it. |
Yeah, it's annoying how many different PCI standards there are now. Used to be simple. There was ISA, and there was ISA-16 (aka: AT). You could tell the difference just by looking, and it was OK to put an ISA card into an ISA-16 slot (and most of the time, you could also put an ISA-16 card into an ISA slot as well.)
And the universe was in harmony. A few trivial intermediate standards (VLB, EISA and MCA) came and went. Nobody noticed, expect for people like me who went out and bought VLB cards only to find them rendered useless when the next generation of motherboards didn't have VLB slots. Then there was PCI. And PCI was Good, for it brought full realization of the Plug-n-Pray standard, with no more jumpers to configure memory addresses and IRQs. Folks figured out that PCI wasn't all that great for the new generation of video cards, so along came AGP. And AGP begat AGP2. And AGP2 begat AGP3. And AGP3 begat AGP3.5. And there was much incompatibility, though at least everything was keyed so that you couldn't blow one up by putting it into the wrong slot. Then there was PCI-X, which was popular on servers but never caught on with desktops. And it was mostly backwards-compatible with PCI, and this was good. But then, someone decided that differential serial was the way to go, so a whole new set of standards were created. And they were called PCI-express, though they were not in any way remotely compatible with PCI or PCI-X. And PCI-express mutated into seventeen thousand different standards, including several for laptops. Fucking progress... On the plus, side, most video cards are standardized at PCI-express 16, and while there are several different revisions of this standard, they tend to be mostly backwards and forwards-compatible. IOW, a PCI-e-16 r2.0 card will usually work in a PCI-e-16 r3.0 slot, and vise versa. |
Originally Posted by Vashthestampede
(Post 646754)
I want dual DVI connections, but I'd rather not downgrade the memory. So maybe its worth it to spend a little more money to have a dual DVI, with at least the same 256 MB or more? Once I find out what kind of card it takes, I assume I can upgrade to any brand card, long as it fits?
For something slightly more future-proof, take a look at this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...-829-_-Product It's about 4x faster than what you have with 2x the memory and comes with both full and low profile brackets. It's DVI+HDMI rather than DVI+DVI, but this $3.71 (plus shipping) cable will fix that for you: http://www.monoprice.com/products/pr...seq=1&format=2 A few trivial intermediate standards (VLB, EISA and MCA) came and went. Nobody noticed, expect for people like me who went out and bought VLB cards only to find them rendered useless when the next generation of motherboards didn't have VLB slots. |
I cant seem to find the info on Intel's site, regarding the motherboard.
The crucial scan gave me this though; Genuine Intel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz Model 15, Stepping 6 2128 MHz Does that help any? The computer itself is a Dell XPS 410. Back when I bought it, it was the top of the line. I'm sure now that its pretty dated. Thanks for the handholding guys. :bigtu: Like I said before, I'm not too computer savvy and I have a hard time understanding some things. I always know that if there's a question to ask, there's someone on this board with an answer. lol |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands