2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
(Post 1096203)
brain, you shooting with prime lenses?
Most my shots were with a 17-70 2.8-4 on my DX or my current 24-70 2.8.
Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
(Post 1096195)
I guess this is no longer strictly a c&c thread... sorry. I just like discovering new things and sharing them for those who might not know. Though I'm guessing I'm probably one of the last fools to know of this technique
Did you know that the Long Exposure Noise reduction in camera, the body literally just takes another photo of the same exposure with the shutter closed, and then stacks the images to remove hot pixels and shit? If you want to save battery and delay, I'd suggest keeping that function off. If you take a 30sec exposure, the camera with be useless for 1min (your 30sec shot, plus the second), plus any buffering time. I'd rather do it in post. This has been a problem I have been worrying over for a while now, how to get enough light down there. Still bring a speedlight or two, but this will allow the use of a lower flash power and get a more even fill of a large chamber from constant lights. this was with my 85mm: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1390918437 Pookie in Autumn Sun 2 by The Braineack, on Flickr |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1096297)
Sometimes, but not mostly. I only have the 85mm 1.8G currently (had the 35mm before and almost never used it). Been thinking of picking up a 50mm 1.4D, but I want to get my 70-200 2.8 first before anything, but the new damn 150-600mm Tamron is seriously tempting me.
Most my shots were with a 17-70 2.8-4 on my DX or my current 24-70 2.8. Did you know that the Long Exposure Noise reduction in camera, the body literally just takes another photo of the same exposure with the shutter closed, and then stacks the images to remove hot pixels and shit? If you want to save battery and delay, I'd suggest keeping that function off. If you take a 30sec exposure, the camera with be useless for 1min (your 30sec shot, plus the second), plus any buffering time. I'd rather do it in post. ever just thought about light painting during a longer exposure? this was with my 85mm: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1390918437 Pookie in Autumn Sun 2 by The Braineack, on Flickr I want a long fast prime like the 85. I've really had the 105 2.8 VR on my want list for years now. Excellent bokeh, great portraits and also macro function. Such a useful lens for under $1k. |
I've never shot in a cave, but I was thinking a diffused flash fired multiple times in various spots during multiple long exposures to create one evenly lit photo.
similar to what he did here maybe: http://www.pgdesigns.co.uk/blogInner...logID=11&id=11 |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1096472)
I've never shot in a cave, but I was thinking a diffused flash fired multiple times in various spots during multiple long exposures to create one evenly lit photo.
|
hide? multiple exposures! see my edit to the post.
honestly use dont even need a flash, you could use a spare lamp. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1096475)
hide? multiple exposures! see my edit to the post.
honestly use dont even need a flash, you could use a spare lamp. Kind of an extreme example, but this is a bit... large. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1390939346 To get that lighting, they used a high power studio light with battery pack at the entrance, at the top where the light is spilling down, and at the bottom it looks like they probably have a few speedlights for fill, as well as their headlamps. The stuff I'm wanting to fill is probably only 1/3 of that, but still a bit too large for painting I think. |
And I have now proven my camera in snow and cold. Was outside earlier at 8 degrees with decently heavy snow fall. Viewfinder eye piece was completely packed closed with snow/ice and I had to use live view to frame. Body got pretty soaked as well. Never a second of concern, it did well.
This snow is stupid! People around here lose their damn minds when it snows. Cars piled up everywhere on roadways. |
Stop thinking in 1 exposure, that car shot took at least 9.
lets say you were doing it in 1, you can walk around with a speedlight and fire it at will during the exposure across the faces of walls. If you cant get everything "painted" in one shot, do another flashing in different spots, and put those together. But yeah I can see how an area that large can be tricky. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1096559)
Stop thinking in 1 exposure, that car shot took at least 9.
lets say you were doing it in 1, you can walk around with a speedlight and fire it at will during the exposure across the faces of walls. If you cant get everything "painted" in one shot, do another flashing in different spots, and put those together. But yeah I can see how an area that large can be tricky. |
Finally! I've spent the last 2 or 3 hours trying to sort out some colorspace issues. Files in photoshop, adobe raw, my desktop and webpages ALL looked different from one another. Apparently, Adobe Raw was the only real issue, as it was embedding AdobeRGB profile, which was then opened and saved by PS in sRGB, but my proof setup was checked by Working CMYK which was displaying files open in PS as more saturated and slightly bluer than they were in reality. Then I found out my favorite browser, Chrome, doesn't even support embedded colorspaces. So when I or anyone else views them with the Chrome browser, they won't look true to color. Why must this shit be so damn complicated!?
Now I just need to calibrate my monitor colors and I'll be good to go. |
So how did you guys all go about starting to learn photography? Did you get a camera and just dive right in? Read up on every little aspect? Both? I just had a d3000 fall into my hands and I would love to learn how to take some semi-decent photos. I have off work tues/weds every week and I think this would be a fun way to get out and see the world, instead of my usual ritual of sitting on the couch eating mozzarella sticks while watching reruns of "boy meets world"... Any tips?
|
Originally Posted by BTMiata
(Post 1097856)
So how did you guys all go about starting to learn photography? Did you get a camera and just dive right in? Read up on every little aspect? Both? I just had a d3000 fall into my hands and I would love to learn how to take some semi-decent photos. I have off work tues/weds every week and I think this would be a fun way to get out and see the world, instead of my usual ritual of sitting on the couch eating mozzarella sticks while watching reruns of "boy meets world"... Any tips?
|
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391431462
IMG_4380 by skidude108, on Flickr Here is my next entry for critique. Taken in northern Quebec on a camping trip I took through Labrador. |
Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
(Post 1097851)
Finally! I've spent the last 2 or 3 hours trying to sort out some colorspace issues. Files in photoshop, adobe raw, my desktop and webpages ALL looked different from one another. Apparently, Adobe Raw was the only real issue, as it was embedding AdobeRGB profile, which was then opened and saved by PS in sRGB, but my proof setup was checked by Working CMYK which was displaying files open in PS as more saturated and slightly bluer than they were in reality. Then I found out my favorite browser, Chrome, doesn't even support embedded colorspaces. So when I or anyone else views them with the Chrome browser, they won't look true to color. Why must this shit be so damn complicated!?
Now I just need to calibrate my monitor colors and I'll be good to go. Before I figured out what was happening, I was working on some web graphics and I'd pick colors, and then when I'd save them and publish they weren't even close to a match, when in PS when I thought I was at #000000 (pure black), it might have been a dark gray when uploaded. I did figure out if I saved the file I had to save it a certain way to make sure it was all a match. I never figured out how to clear out the Adobe colorspace thing until I redid the install. It was annoying. |
Originally Posted by BTMiata
(Post 1097856)
So how did you guys all go about starting to learn photography? Did you get a camera and just dive right in? Read up on every little aspect? Both? I just had a d3000 fall into my hands and I would love to learn how to take some semi-decent photos. I have off work tues/weds every week and I think this would be a fun way to get out and see the world, instead of my usual ritual of sitting on the couch eating mozzarella sticks while watching reruns of "boy meets world"... Any tips?
I also worked for a 1-hour photo when they still had those things. During college I only had a little Kodak PNS (before cell phone cameras were a big thing) and that was better than nothing, and once I graduated I upgraded to a D40 because I missed having an SLR. And I mainly used it to take pictures of cars on the track/autox and the miata stuff. Nothing really beyond that. But it really wasn't until last May when I went to the Dominican Republic that I really got back into photography to do more than just take "good" pictures. I ended purchasing a Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4 lens, for my D3100, so I'd just have one decent lens I could travel with and while there I took some pretty good shots that I'm proud of. That really sparked up my interest again beyond just taking car pics. Since then I went from a D3100 to a D5100, replaced my 55-300mm with a 70-300mm, sold my 10-24mm and bought a 85mm 1.8G, bought a second flash and remote triggers and modifiers like umbrellas and softboxes. And now since I started part my car and moving my money back into this hobby I've upgrade further to a D600 and a 24-70mm F/2.8 and I'm about to pull the trigger on a 70-200mm F/2.8 once I can sell my wheels/tires. I still don't shoot enough, and that bothers me with all this money invested into it. Come spring I have a few peeps that want some portraits done and I hope that it takes off a bit and I can monetize the hobby a bit by doing it. But yeah, besides my cats, I don't have much to shoot at home, so I need to start venturing out and making opportunities for myself to practice and learn. The more you shot the better you get; photography is really a technical skill, it's what you do with that skill that makes you a good/noteworthy photographer or not. Also, anyone who's trying to venture in to flash photography would be smart to read: . |
Originally Posted by skidude
(Post 1098123)
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391431462
IMG_4380 by skidude108, on Flickr Here is my next entry for critique. Taken in northern Quebec on a camping trip I took through Labrador. Not a bad shot, tough to expose for both a sky and subjects and I think you made the correct choice of exposing for the sky and letting the subjects go to silhouette. Could have been interesting with some off camera flash to fill the subjects, but whateves. I wouldn't mind if you pushed the saturation just a bit in the sky. |
5 Attachment(s)
Here's a few shots of my backyard this weekend:
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391435108 Thirsty Squirrel by The Braineack, on Flickr http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2842/1...863741ca_b.jpg Thirsty Squirrel by The Braineack, on Flickr https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391435108 Deer in Sun by The Braineack, on Flickr https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391435108 Deer in Woods by The Braineack, on Flickr https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391435108 Deer in Woods by The Braineack, on Flickr https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391435108 Deer in Sun by The Braineack, on Flickr |
7 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1098135)
I took 3 years of photography in HS and learned on film so I new the basic techniques of photography before digital and auto-focus. But I was never a scholar and really put little effort into learning/experimenting, I regret that.
I also worked for a 1-hour photo when they still had those things. During college I only had a little Kodak PNS (before cell phone cameras were a big thing) and that was better than nothing, and once I graduated I upgraded to a D40 because I missed having an SLR. And I mainly used it to take pictures of cars on the track/autox and the miata stuff. Nothing really beyond that. But it really wasn't until last May when I went to the Dominican Republic that I really got back into photography to do more than just take "good" pictures. I ended purchasing a Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4 lens, for my D3100, so I'd just have one decent lens I could travel with and while there I took some pretty good shots that I'm proud of. That really sparked up my interest again beyond just taking car pics. Since then I went from a D3100 to a D5100, replaced my 55-300mm with a 70-300mm, sold my 10-24mm and bought a 85mm 1.8G, bought a second flash and remote triggers and modifiers like umbrellas and softboxes. And now since I started part my car and moving my money back into this hobby I've upgrade further to a D600 and a 24-70mm F/2.8 and I'm about to pull the trigger on a 70-200mm F/2.8 once I can sell my wheels/tires. I still don't shoot enough, and that bothers me with all this money invested into it. Come spring I have a few peeps that want some portraits done and I hope that it takes off a bit and I can monetize the hobby a bit by doing it. But yeah, besides my cats, I don't have much to shoot at home, so I need to start venturing out and making opportunities for myself to practice and learn. The more you shot the better you get; photography is really a technical skill, it's what you do with that skill that makes you a good/noteworthy photographer or not. That's awesome! Keep it up because you definitely have some talent! The wife and I were discussing taking a photography course at the local community college, but I'm not sure if it will happen with our work schedule's Here are a few of the first pictures I ever took with our "new" D3000. I really struggled with the shots off my deck... No idea what I'm doing obviously lol. Pretty bad but I hope to keep at it and learn how to take some decent shots. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391441124 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391441124 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391441124 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391441124 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391441124 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391441124 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391441124 |
Originally Posted by skidude
(Post 1098123)
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391431462
IMG_4380 by skidude108, on Flickr Here is my next entry for critique. Taken in northern Quebec on a camping trip I took through Labrador. But you can fake it by bracketing and stitching... |
1 Attachment(s)
finally found the one shot I wanted to link when we were talking about high ISO.
From that same Flickr page: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1391454881 iso 20,000 |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands