Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

PITT FSAE updates Pictures!

Old Sep 29, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #41  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by cueball1
Why such a short wheelbase? Looks like the front suspension could have been moved forward on the frame some.
That car actually has a long wheelbase compaired to most. This years is going to be 2 inches shorter. It helps alot on the tight autox course.

Thanks ZX-Tex!!
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #42  
coastertrav's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 684
Total Cats: 1
From: Orlando FL - UCF
Default

Yeah, our car has to get bigger in every dimension this year. I believe we are going to be 3 inches longer and 6 inches wider, but not much taller.

Also as of now we have talked the aero guy into not having any forms of a wing on the car, but he still wants to do a diffuser, so that is good.
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #43  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Short wheel base FTW!
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 01:40 AM
  #44  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

SHITTY VIDEO!!!!

YAYYY

Here is a short and crappy video of last yuears car, just listin to the sound...

BTW the muffler on the car was fully created by a guy in the team.


http://s53.photobucket.com/albums/g4...t=MOV00099.flv
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 01:51 AM
  #45  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

sounds like a bike
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 02:21 AM
  #46  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
sounds like a bike
uhh yeah?
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 07:28 PM
  #47  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

So me and two others spend 3 hours today making this.....







Name:  DSC00100.jpg
Views: 469
Size:  51.3 KB
Name:  DSC00101.jpg
Views: 396
Size:  51.5 KB
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 01:35 PM
  #48  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

Thought id update! We have the chassis mostly together, and are working on the engine.

We just got the intake mani in, its sick! We used some sort of rapid prototypeing procedure, and its made of a composite. It literally weighs a pound! And the body is going to be sick this year, much better than last.
Attached Thumbnails PITT FSAE updates Pictures!-dsc00008.jpg   PITT FSAE updates Pictures!-dsc00007.jpg   PITT FSAE updates Pictures!-dsc00011.jpg  
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 02:36 PM
  #49  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by cardriverx
We used some sort of rapid prototypeing procedure, and its made of a composite.
I would like to know what that is since I get rapid prototype parts made from time to time. Is it glass-reinforced ABS made by selective laser sintering (SLS), or is it something else? The surface finish looks SLA smooth from the pictures (good for the nozzle/diffuser), but I have not heard of SLA based composite structures.
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 05:44 PM
  #50  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
I would like to know what that is since I get rapid prototype parts made from time to time. Is it glass-reinforced ABS made by selective laser sintering (SLS), or is it something else? The surface finish looks SLA smooth from the pictures (good for the nozzle/diffuser), but I have not heard of SLA based composite structures.
I forget, ill get you the answer next week. Its slightly rough to the touch on the outside, It feels different than most plastics ive touched, so light yet stiff.
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 04:03 AM
  #51  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

more pictures... we actually have a rolling car!
Attached Thumbnails PITT FSAE updates Pictures!-dsc00012.jpg   PITT FSAE updates Pictures!-dsc00015.jpg   PITT FSAE updates Pictures!-dsc00016.jpg   PITT FSAE updates Pictures!-dsc00020.jpg   PITT FSAE updates Pictures!-dsc00019.jpg  

Old Mar 28, 2009 | 09:23 AM
  #52  
the_man's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 333
Total Cats: 0
From: MD/DE/PA
Default

Sticking with a 4 cylinder, huh? What sprockets are you running? Also looks like you're moving away from inboard shocks/springs?
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 03:56 AM
  #53  
coastertrav's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 684
Total Cats: 1
From: Orlando FL - UCF
Default

Yeah, what is up with not using inboard shocks? I'm all for the move, but many guys on the team are into the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" attitude.

Looks like we are just a little behind you guys. We caught a snag when some guys were going to outsource the machining of the uprights and they didn't come through on there promise. We are done with quite a few other projects though, and everything is going to just fly on the car here soon.

I'm surprised with all the rules, and both of us using similar plans, how different our two cars are going to look.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 09:53 AM
  #54  
the_man's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 333
Total Cats: 0
From: MD/DE/PA
Default

Typically the driving factors for/against inboard shocks are, in order of importance, space and weight/complexity. They obviously add more parts to design and fab up, and add (albeit minimal) weight, but the big thing is usually just whether there's space for them, particularly by the driver's legs. That doesn't seem to be a concern in the car in the photos, looks like there's plenty of space there, although looks can be deceiving. I'm much more surprised to see a four-cylinder motor in there, really.

Hanging pedals or floor-mounted?
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 05:25 PM
  #55  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by the_man
Typically the driving factors for/against inboard shocks are, in order of importance, space and weight/complexity. They obviously add more parts to design and fab up, and add (albeit minimal) weight, but the big thing is usually just whether there's space for them, particularly by the driver's legs. That doesn't seem to be a concern in the car in the photos, looks like there's plenty of space there, although looks can be deceiving. I'm much more surprised to see a four-cylinder motor in there, really.

Hanging pedals or floor-mounted?
This is a whole new chassis for us this year, and im pretty sure the shocks are for complexity's sake.

There is a ton of room with this chassis, its going to be much more confortable than lasts.

Pedals are floor mounted.

The engine is a honda cbr 600rr engine. Sure it weighs more, but the power is too fun
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 08:57 PM
  #56  
the_man's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 333
Total Cats: 0
From: MD/DE/PA
Default

What sprockets are you running? The single cylinders have the advantages in weight and packaging, as well as torque- the 4-cylinders get the advantage when you can actually get them wound out, which is often difficult on tight FSAE courses.

Makes sense to stick with outboard shocks for now if it's a new chassis, you've got enough crap to deal with, and they can always be evolved on later. Or not. Or whatever.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 09:20 PM
  #57  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Yeah we did the same thing on our car with outboard shocks for the same reason. We were a first year team (no one at our university had completed a car before) so we kept it simple wherever we could. The speeds at the FSAE courses are slow enough to where you are not going to have a noticeable penalty on drag. Plus they are easy to get to if you want to make adjustments.
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #58  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
I would like to know what that is since I get rapid prototype parts made from time to time. Is it glass-reinforced ABS made by selective laser sintering (SLS), or is it something else? The surface finish looks SLA smooth from the pictures (good for the nozzle/diffuser), but I have not heard of SLA based composite structures.
Hey, sorry to get back to you late, but it is a nylon based (or reinforced?) plastic that was made using the laser method.
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #59  
the_man's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 333
Total Cats: 0
From: MD/DE/PA
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
Yeah we did the same thing on our car with outboard shocks for the same reason. We were a first year team (no one at our university had completed a car before) so we kept it simple wherever we could. The speeds at the FSAE courses are slow enough to where you are not going to have a noticeable penalty on drag. Plus they are easy to get to if you want to make adjustments.
We made (well, "we" is loose here- when the car with inboard shocks came to be last year, I'd already graduated, but still a fairly active alum) adjustable rocker arms so that even more adjustability of the suspension was available. It was a really, really sweet design.
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:43 AM
  #60  
cardriverx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 12
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

I cant edit my title anymore =(. Well here are some new badass pics. Just just about ready to run, I was so happy to get it on the ground today! We wrapped the intake in alum plates, kevlar, then carbon fiber. Woo this is gonna be so awesome.





NEW PICS





Name:  DSC00032.jpg
Views: 258
Size:  221.0 KB

Name:  DSC00031.jpg
Views: 293
Size:  245.3 KB

Name:  DSC00033.jpg
Views: 401
Size:  229.7 KB

Name:  DSC00034.jpg
Views: 285
Size:  212.6 KB

Name:  DSC00035.jpg
Views: 294
Size:  249.7 KB

Name:  DSC00036.jpg
Views: 279
Size:  191.8 KB

Name:  DSC00037.jpg
Views: 291
Size:  261.6 KB

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 PM.