Originally Posted by thenuge26
(Post 923751)
No, you don't understand. He was sawzalling the skinnies over in the middle east.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1346950357 I'm not fat bitch. I am lean and I will crush your skull with my hyperactive nutsackx. |
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 924058)
And the OP -is- named Morgan, so it supports Kenzo's theory.
/wrists (with cake) |
Originally Posted by Faeflora
(Post 924061)
I'm not fat bitch. I am lean and I will crush your skull with my hyperactive nutsackx.
|
Originally Posted by thenuge26
(Post 924121)
That's because it's not you, numbnuts. It's OP swatting some skinnies with his sawzall over in the middle east.
|
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 923984)
^Ban.
RWD, cheap, reliable. Lot of aftermarket. |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 923969)
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
I hope you're joking :rofl: Believe it or not there are many cars that are quite reliable when maintained correctly that you'll never know about if you believe everything on the internet. |
This thread is starting to go full retard. 240sx? 944? Really?
Yes, rotarheads and dsm'ers will argue til blue in the face about how 99.99% of their failures are from inproper maint. The fact remains: 99.99% of them are broken and break on a daily basis, so your argument is pretty weak. I've no idea about the old porsche reliability, just saying. As for the 240: if you like hardparking or d0r1ftoing, sure its a great car. Actually I'd say its a nice car to daily too: if you can find an unmolested one (highly unlikely). The KA is so torquey, just a pleasure to drive in traffic. |
I've heard that gross exaggerations help to prove a point. :)
|
Like 18psi is saying. I have seen Miata's were it looked like the owner was trying to break some record on lack of care and were still running.
|
Originally Posted by concealer404
(Post 924205)
I've heard that gross exaggerations help to prove a point. :)
The only people of the 2 groups I mentioned that have nothing but good things to say about their cars are hardcore enthusiasts dedicated to that car alone, and put unnecessary effort into maintaining said cars. replacing parts every 10k miles when they should last 60k.......checking and inspecting everything like 10x a day. Just spending a ton of money and time keeping their precious car in tip top shape. Sure it will run like a champ if maintained that way. Look at the miata: half the people on here with one have a shitty hack job band aid system, beat on the car all the time, and high miles with next to no maintenance, and the cars are still kickin. You don't see de-motivational posters about the miata being a POS floating around everywhere...just that its gay lulz |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 924208)
But the point is valid. And that's the point.
The only people of the 2 groups I mentioned that have nothing but good things to say about their cars are hardcore enthusiasts dedicated to that car alone, and put unnecessary effort into maintaining said cars. replacing parts every 10k miles when they should last 60k.......checking and inspecting everything like 10x a day. Just spending a ton of money and time keeping their precious car in tip top shape. Sure it will run like a champ if maintained that way. Look at the miata: half the people on here with one have a shitty hack job band aid system, beat on the car all the time, and high miles with next to no maintenance, and the cars are still kickin. You don't see de-motivational posters about the miata being a POS floating around everywhere...just that its gay lulz I'll disagree on the DSM front due to personal experiences, as long as stupid mods are kept to a minimum, but where's the fun in that? Regardless, i don't think anyone mentioned DSM as a good alternative to a Miata. They aren't. :rofl: |
Originally Posted by jacob300zx
(Post 924207)
Like 18psi is saying. I have seen Miata's were it looked like the owner was trying to break some record on lack of care and were still running.
|
The 944 shouldn't even be a consideration. They are very expensive to maintain properly, the maintenance intervals are very short, parts are hard to find, very difficult to work on, they aren't reliable and there isn't an aftermarket for them.
With that being said, I will never sell mine. |
Originally Posted by Fheyr13
(Post 924039)
I'm just trying to learn the ropes and fit in.
/brad pitt |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 924201)
This thread is starting to go full retard. 240sx? 944? Really?
Yes, rotarheads and dsm'ers will argue til blue in the face about how 99.99% of their failures are from inproper maint. The fact remains: 99.99% of them are broken and break on a daily basis, so your argument is pretty weak. I've no idea about the old porsche reliability, just saying. As for the 240: if you like hardparking or d0r1ftoing, sure its a great car. Actually I'd say its a nice car to daily too: if you can find an unmolested one (highly unlikely). The KA is so torquey, just a pleasure to drive in traffic. |
Originally Posted by JayL
(Post 924222)
944 shouldn't even be a consideration. They are very expensive to maintain properly, the maintenance intervals are very short, parts are hard to find, very difficult to work on, they aren't reliable and there isn't an aftermarket for them.
Sorry guise, 944 ≠ Miata Also: Is this an intro thread? This looks like an intro thread... |
Originally Posted by tasty danish
(Post 924365)
I said FB rx7. Check your facts. That meme or reputation or whatever you want to call it didn't come around till the later turbo models. turbo rotaries are not cheap or easy or reliable, or anything. I'll give you that (even though I think you're wrong). However FB's are built like tanks and NEVER suffered from that reputation. Don't believe me? Go talk to a classic rotary race team, or compare how many 150,000+ miles FB's there are compared to FC's and FD's.
Originally Posted by EO2K
(Post 924372)
Also: Is this an intro thread? This looks like an intro thread... |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 924374)
I wasn't referring to your post or claim about FB rx7's lol....relax....Yes I was talking about the turbo ones
More like a coming out thread:giggle: Some things about rx-7s have definitely earned their rep, but I do think they're better than many give them credit for. Though I will give you this: I'm moving to japan so my turbo fb will become an NA 20b, and if I ever owned an FD it'd have an lsx |
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 924247)
The first rule of fitting in is not to talk about fitting in.
/brad pitt ........ I've made two mistakes...... |
1 Attachment(s)
|
WAT? ^lol
Seriously, besides e30's and or crappy E36 M3's, there's not a lot of cars out there like a turbo Miata. |
Originally Posted by Linh
(Post 924513)
WAT? ^lol
Seriously, besides e30's and or crappy E36 M3's, there's not a lot of cars out there like a turbo Miata. Bimmers don't compare in reliability/cost of maintenance. +1 on the KA 240 as a daily, they are fun but suck as actual sports cars. They're more like a sporty grocery getter. Plus they don't have the miata gay factor so there is pretty much no reason to own one. Fox body mustangs might come close in cheap speed factor but they don't handle or stop or do anything that any of us care about except for go fast in a straight line. My turbo MR2 had ridiculous overheating problems, but when it was running cool it was fun car except I'd hit my head on the roof with every speed bump. |
Originally Posted by Sam TII
(Post 924635)
Bimmers don't compare in reliability/cost of maintenance.
They are supposed to be superior vehicles, wtf is the deal? |
Originally Posted by EO2K
(Post 924372)
Exactly this. I have a friend with a turbo 944 (951 IIRC) who desperately wants a Miata. Why? Because he can get one for the cost of having a shop replace the clutch in his 944.
Sorry guise, 944 ≠ Miata Also: Is this an intro thread? This looks like an intro thread... If you must have a front engine Porsche, for whatever reason, id go for a 928/968 before anything. The 968 four with its variocam is not a bad engine. |
4th gen Fbody.
-Large aftermarket -parts are cheap -fast out of box -easy to boost with a rear mount or a front mount if you have an LS1 (can use factory manifolds) -stock ECU can be used for almost every setup including BOOST -dead nuts reliable (LS1 has the advantage but LT1s arent near as bad as people let on) -strong factory tranny if you get the Manual which all real men will -cheap -versatile (good road course or drag cars) -tons of info available -plus if your not dead set on boost you can make 450+whp NA on the stock bottom end using GM head -they get decent mileage with the T56, I got 28 mpg with 3.73s and bolt ons but untuned. -The redneck hillbilly stigma can be almost as fun as the gay one |
1 Attachment(s)
Why go 4th gen Fbody when you can get an IROC?https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1347154865
|
$:Fun
If the yardstick is dollars to fun ratio, no, nothing compares.
I spend a lot of time (too much?) at the track and have seen every platform you can think of out in HPDE, TT, or racing. The guys that routinely spend the least, get the most track time, have the biggest field of similar cars to run with.. Miatas. Nothing close actually. $:Speed for a production car, its the S2000. C5 Z06 is a bit more and costs a bunch extra to make bombproof. The S2000 is pretty bombproof to start and nearly as fast as a Z06 given similar mods. The difference is the car itself as well as the consumables and go fast bits all cost a bunch more than anything on a Miata. |
Earlier BMW's aren't so bad in maintenance if you do it yourself. Still not cheaper than a Miata but not expensive as you might think.
Anyway, BMW's aren't much of a tuner car like the Miata. However, they are nicely balanced cars coming from a manufacture. High mileage s2000's can be had for 8-9k. Agree that consumables will go much faster compared to a Miata; brakes, pads, tires etc. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands