Tokina 11-16 f2.8 , finally got a UWA lens
I had a hard time choosing between the tokina and the canon 10-22, but ultimately the constant 2.8 aperture, superior build quality, included lens hood, and $200 cheaper price won me over. I've only snapped a few shots with it so far and can already tell it'll be on my camera a lot! I've played with the 10-22 before, so I new what to expect with the UWA lens, but I'm still so impressed with how close you can get to something and still get everything in the frame. Any who, on to pictures for those that share the camera addiction :giggle:
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1344/...32f4800b_b.jpg http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1193/...5f336707_b.jpg About 12" away from the taillight... http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4052/...9e7fc241_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4060/...a79a1240_b.jpg Lens hood was literally about 1" away from the top of the bottle.... http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4023/...fc160163_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4016/...2b62621a_b.jpg http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1406/...eba16b21_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4058/...e77ec6c6_b.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4050/...d5924f63_b.jpg |
Great looking boxes. Or maybe it's just my computer. I only see one image.
|
Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
(Post 653674)
Great looking boxes. Or maybe it's just my computer. I only see one image.
|
Originally Posted by Cspence
(Post 653676)
I pasted the wrong links....they should be good now
|
I hate you. I want this lens so bad for my Nikon, and when I had the cash and was ready for a trip to the islands, it was out of stock everywhere. Gaaaaah.
Enjoy! |
Originally Posted by Reverant
(Post 653686)
I hate you. I want this lens so bad for my Nikon, and when I had the cash and was ready for a trip to the islands, it was out of stock everywhere. Gaaaaah.
Enjoy! |
I'd love to pick up a wide angle, but I spent the money on a new body...just picked up the d3100.
my cat thinks it's boring. http://www.boostedmiata.com/gallery2...2/DSC_0158.JPG |
Brain, your cat looks wide angle in that shot. wtf.
|
omg, its amazing how much better your cat looks with moar megah-pixelz!!!!!111
|
haha that's at 125mm too.
|
Damn you people, making me feel inferior with my old ass D50. When I got mine it was about to be outdated within several months with new models but I couldn't wait. Paid something like $800 for my inferior old garbage!!! :vash: Seeing that $700 price is killing me actually. Maybe I can go whore myself out and make some quick money.
|
Damn it. Yet again my D50 lets me down, though it was user error. I went to Barber Motorsports Museum earlier today and took some nice shots, but forgot I had messed around with my camera recently and had it on ISO1600, so everything is pretty grainy. I should have check that, since I was wondering why my shots were so well lit at such a high shutter speed. Oh well, it was still fun. I should go more often considering I live less than a mile from the track.
|
doesnt your D50 have auto iso?
|
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 654046)
doesnt your D50 have auto iso?
|
The auto iso feature on my new camera is weird. I'm used to having to manually do it, so I'm getting some shots at 1200-3200iso with the flash.
The above picture in P mode was: Focal Length 125 mm Aperture Value f/7.1 Flash Compulsory Flash, Return light detected ISO 1250 Shutter Speed Value 1/60 sec full size is fairly grainy : http://www.boostedmiata.com/gallery2...1/DSC_0158.JPG |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 654176)
The auto iso feature on my new camera is weird. I'm used to having to manually do it, so I'm getting some shots at 1200-3200iso with the flash.
The above picture in P mode was: Focal Length 125 mm Aperture Value f/7.1 Flash Compulsory Flash, Return light detected ISO 1250 Shutter Speed Value 1/60 sec full size is fairly grainy : http://www.boostedmiata.com/gallery2...1/DSC_0158.JPG Does any of the grainyness go away if you shoot in raw? |
I get this a lot as well, I change some setting to my liking (ISO, WB, flash exp, whatever) and then forget to switch it back to normal. The "Restore to defaults" shortcut works well for this, but what if the "default" values ("standard JPEG" instead of say, "fine JPEG + RAW") are not really your ideal values?
|
Originally Posted by Aricjm15
(Post 654179)
Does any of the grainyness go away if you shoot in raw?
|
I'm just happy I read the manual and learned I can program the function button. I like being able to white balance on the spot.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 654185)
I'm just happy I read the manual and learned I can program the function button. I like being able to white balance on the spot.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands