Whats youre IQueue?
 

As the title says. Poll it up.

Super serious. Wexler or stanford binet or internet trainwrecktest. Whatever. Post it up.

is this your way of telling us you sawzalled your ISF?

Well no. Superserious.

Just gerbally curious.

Generally curious too.

Drunk. And spelling proper.

this is a pretty dumb thread.

the results of IQ tests are entirely open to interpretation.

Noshiz. It is more than interpretation. Lets talk results. My biddy i mean buddy who has 176 iq and worth every point of it is a junkie in NOLA.

By other benchmarks, i failed school from 6th grade on.

So post up bitxhes

Waiting for our bell curve effectioneers vash and joe p. haha

I think a range is more appropriate for gauging one's intelligence quotient

Fo sure.

Sleep deprived and drunk vs well slept and caffienated can be a 40pt spread

Balls

Over 9000

I havnt been tested since year 9, but was a proper 4 hour long psychological test.

Dann

If srs, go here. It'll take ~20 minutes. Short but reasonably comprehensive wrt what it covers.
Classical IQ Test

Failflora's IQ must be pretty low, because there is no option for 160-170.

Lol fuchs. And i thought i was counting so well :(

No my iq is not rated. It is ALLOFIT duh

IQueue at arround 0-6kph, i find that if IQueue at over 90kph i crash in to others in the supermarket line. :giggle:

Well Goddamn, aren't we all a bunch of geniuses!? 2 150-160 and 3 170-180. 170 is 1 in ~600,000 and 180 is 1 in ~20,000,000. Who of you who are voting have had an ACTUAL IQ test performed?

My IQ puts me at 1 in 3,800.

My post was legit.

Dann

I also had one done, at maybe 14 or 15.

I did that 20min one posted above while i cooked tea, got 124. though acording to this thread im a spastic compared to the rest of you :)

My 120 is the lower of the 2 multi-hour psyche evaluation tests I've had.

I do not know too many people who take part in multi hour IQ tests past the age of 10. I think my last one was at 8 and it was required to test eligibility for the "gifted" program I was in in elementary and middle school. Not even really sure how effective these tests are at determining real intelligence.

two hundred, ma'am.

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1342790018




also, is "queue" pronounced "kwee-wee?"

I don't make it into the tripple digit range. Too much effort.

Tested in 4th grade. No idea where I'd test now.

Mine was part of an ADD evaluation. I was there pretty much all day long. I was having issues in school. It wasn't ADD, it was only boredom.

Net worth has nothing to do with IQ.

124, woot! I think I'm happy with that. Did it in bed as I woke up with no coffee though, so take that with a grain of sand.

130+ bro

Exactly. I never got the exact results or atleast I do not remember them. So all I know is according to the test proctor I had an IQ of atleast 130 at age 8. I have no idea if IQ fluctuates at all as you age but I assume it stays relatively stable.

:giggle:When I was in grammar school, I tested at 165, but there is no place on the poll to so indicate. It was also in the 1950's when people were much more intelligent:giggle:

Shouldnt change too much with time. That said when i was young i was super fukking sharp. Now, sawzall.

Chutzpah quotient would indicate net worth. That is a good part of why i make a decent amount. Millionaire small biz owners "living the american dream" typically have a lot of chutzpah and the anility to endure failire.

sawzall is a rather blunt weapon

Took that test and got a 124.

http://en.memgenerator.pl/mem-image/...ough-en-ae0808

age is taken into account. old methods used to compare age to "mental age" and new methods compare intelligence to people of similar age, 100 being "average" and each standard deviation from average being 15 points.

Did the quick test, 134. A bit above average is about where I usually test in most things. Not a genius, just smarter than the average dumbass.

130 is actually pretty damn intelligent. Means that given a group of fifty people you are probably more intelligent than all of them.

Remember that 100 is the dead nuts average.

I took one to examine for brain damage after "severe" drug usage. One I got 120, another, 145. The doctor estimated, based on my drug use, that I have at best 75% brain function (meaning the rest is "dead" for the time being, waiting to be repaired over the next few decades).


The tests taken online are NOTHING like a real IQ test. Time is not a factor in most of the tests, and questions often are presented as brain teasers. Memory and spacial reasoning are not tested.



130 average with a cooked brain? I can live with that. FWIW: the US average is just below 100. The world average is supposed to be 100. The 100 figure is constantly recalculated to compensate for increasing rates of knowledge related to age. A 100 50 years ago would below 100 today. Not to say that they were not as smart back then, just that their knowledge/age ratio is different than the current ratio.

The test I linked earlier begins with spatial reasoning problems, and moves into memory and logic questions. In total, 57 questions to be answered in a 30 minute time period. I do agree that a 30 minute online test is not going to be as accurate as a proctored, multi-hour test.

I'm not sure the severe drug use issue really is one, but who knows. I tested 135 in 6th grade (30 years ago), and in the interim have used LSD 100+ times, and smoked nearly my weight in marijuana.

Umm I say it depends on the drugs.

Yeah, huffing glue does kill brain cells. First girlfriend huffed A LOT OF GLUE.

But she was still quite intelligent.

So does paint thinner

and crack

but it reallllly takes many years.

My problem with multi hour tests is getting bored and/or just wanting it to be over and starting to answer questions quick. Regardless of intelligence, it just gets boring. maybe that is part of the test. My problem is memory. I forget stupid stuff. As in walking into the grocery store and forgeting why I walked in. Or setting down a tool and spending 10min trying to find it again.

Memory is my weak link too. I like to think my brain power is being used elsewhere. Which is why I can't remember ----.

127 according to the test linked on the other page, no calculator, no paper to write ---- down.

When you overdose 3 times in 3 months, it's bound to do some damage. Goddamn pills. :vash:

Memory is a skill bitches. Practice at it and you will get better. Thuper therious

Touche'

I took the full test in grade school in the 70's and took it again sometime much later and it did in fact stay the same. 133 both times.

That test is BS. Says I score 131. Matt and Carol both scored an even number on the test and Sparetire scored 8 more than Carol. So right there I know their system is off.:party:

It sure as hell is not related to that online test. %$#@.

Way off. Either that system is severely flawed, or I have fallen on my head one too many times in the last 10 years, because my score on this test was about 35 points lower than my professionally given test roughly 10-12 years ago. A 117 vs a 152.

Though in all honesty I did skip 4 or 5 of the questions because I was getting antsy and tired of taking the test. That probably brought it down quite a bit, so maybe not as fa off as that, had I actually answered all of the questions.

I got a real one done in elementary school and highschool and scored a 136 IIRC, not bad at all but it doesn't mean that much. Speaking of intelligence there where people in bootcamp who didn't know what state Cincinnati is in, I guess thats the education you get from NYC schools.

Just as an observation, I have never talked to anyone, or seen anyone admit to an IQ of lower than 100. If 100 is roughly the average, where are these low scoring people? If there are plenty of people claiming 120,130,140 or higher, shouldn't their be a ---- ton of people scoring 80/70/60 or lower? Do people and test givers think too highly of themselves and their intelligence? Or is it just that there are so many more people in the 90 and 100 range, just below "average", that is able to average out the high scores to a mere 100?

For various reasons Im pretty sure the bell curve for IQ doesnt look like a bell.

Also Id trade 10 or 15 of my IQ for other attributes in a second. Maybe not.... But it isnt a ticket to the high life thats for sure.

Dann

Well they are on CR.net... :facepalm:

Absolutely. Hell, I'd give 30 of mine for attribute points to spend.

I got 141 on that most-accurate-online-test. I had it tested once in middle school, but my mom wouldn't tell me my score and now denies that I was ever tested. I don't even know why I was tested, but it must have been either very good, or very bad for her to not tell me.

I have done a study on this site's IQ and you all fail the IQ test of knowing what my post was and/or ignoring it!!

The Boy with the 200 IQ? Coleman's second(?) role after Diff'rent Strokes?

I don't know about your kwee-wee reference. I appear to have the second highest child-test score after Older Guy, so ask him. ;)

324 votes for 90-100? What happened?