No one here likes shit like this.
|
He's been here for over 4 years, and has a 1k+ posts. I think he knows what kind of cars are popular here. I believe he was asking for criticism on his photog skills, not whether or not we like the car.
Astro. Not bad at all. A couple of them are really nice. Most are pretty good. If your an amateur good work. If your a pro, I hope you don't charge too much. |
What the fuck is a FATLACE?
Nice pics. |
your composition sucks dick. what equipment did you use? I mean, besides the obvious photoshop dickery.
|
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 746006)
No one here likes shit like this.
Originally Posted by dstn2bdoa
(Post 746034)
He's been here for over 4 years, and has a 1k+ posts. I think he knows what kind of cars are popular here. I believe he was asking for criticism on his photog skills, not whether or not we like the car.
Originally Posted by dstn2bdoa
(Post 746034)
Astro. Not bad at all. A couple of them are really nice. Most are pretty good. If your an amateur good work. If your a pro, I hope you don't charge too much.
Originally Posted by viperormiata
(Post 746040)
What the fuck is a FATLACE?
Nice pics. |
Originally Posted by pusha
(Post 746061)
your composition sucks dick. what equipment did you use? I mean, besides the obvious photoshop dickery.
|
Originally Posted by astroboy
(Post 746066)
So when you say composition sucks dick you mean I didn't adhere to the "rule" of thirds? Camera's a D5000 with a 50 prime and a 18-55
|
Originally Posted by pusha
(Post 746067)
The rule of thirds and all those fancy conventions can suck on my dangling down dong. Do you consider yourself an artist? I mean, you do have a Flickr so that's like half the battle, right?
|
Not one of your shots made me think. I'm sorry, I don't have anything to offer other than you hit pretty much every cliche exterior shot possible.
|
Originally Posted by dstn2bdoa
(Post 746034)
If your an amateur good work. If your a pro, I hope you don't charge too much.
|
Originally Posted by pusha
(Post 746086)
Not one of your shots made me think. I'm sorry, I don't have anything to offer other than you hit pretty much every cliche exterior shot possible.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2614/...58c62af7_b.jpg Or is this more your thing? http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1074/...8e2a5e8e_b.jpg |
much better.
|
The panning shot or the high perspective shot?
|
I don't know crap about photography, but they look great to me.
All these "Illest" stickers make me want to look for a "Healthiest" sticker. |
Cant wait for us to shoot my car together so you can teach me more. I dont know shit about my camera.
BTW how the fuck did you get that pic in willi at the bridge? |
One day I'll scan all of my prints and host them somewhere. Real men use film.
|
#9 needs the pole removed...it's horrid on the eye.
#11 needs less DOF/more area in focus. Might be better if the rear tire AND wheel were in focus. To me, the object in focus (the farmost part of the lip) is too narrow and distracting...I can't focus on the picture. But what do i know, I'm not some hotshot picturetakerperson. Composition and quality are pretty good IMHO on the rest (although the subject is a bit bland to my personal taste). Does anyone else think Pusha's lame shit talking is getting old? At least Hussie was creative with his keyboard vomit...and it was witty. |
I like #4 and #6
|
Originally Posted by pusha
(Post 746067)
The rule of thirds and all those fancy conventions can suck on my dangling down dong. Do you consider yourself an artist? I mean, you do have a Flickr so that's like half the battle, right?
I think most of them look pretty nice Astro. For shots focusing on the car, it's hard to really do much with them, especially with limited locations and lighting. I think you did a good job overall. Of course there is always improvement, even with very experienced photographers/artists. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands