Notices
MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

1.8vvt in to 90 - Check my spark map!

Old Mar 20, 2020 | 04:19 PM
  #1  
jtpaintballwdp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 280
Total Cats: 0
From: Aldie, VA
Default 1.8vvt in to 90 - Check my spark map!

Hey all,
Just completed the swap of a 01-05 VVT engine in to my 1990. I am using a DIY MS3x and base map from DIY Autotunes MSPNP Pro. Havent touched the spark map just want someone to take a glance and see how it looks. Sure its fine if its what DIY Autotune is shipping on their MSPNP Pro.
Setup:
1.8 vvt engine
Stock 1.8 vvt fuel
Stock 1.8 vvt coils
Squaretop Manifold

Any input would be greatly appreciated
Thanks!

Old Mar 20, 2020 | 04:53 PM
  #2  
SpartanSV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,232
Total Cats: 169
From: Greeley, CO
Default

I don't understand why they taper timing until the 90 kpa row and then jump back up.
Old Mar 20, 2020 | 05:00 PM
  #3  
jtpaintballwdp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 280
Total Cats: 0
From: Aldie, VA
Default

Originally Posted by SpartanSV
I don't understand why they taper timing until the 90 kpa row and then jump back up.
Thought that seemed kind of odd.
Old Mar 20, 2020 | 05:12 PM
  #4  
HowPrayGame's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 412
Total Cats: 28
From: Tampa FL
Default

Here is my naturally aspirated VVT spark map for comparison.

Been running this for roughly a year on 93 octane, could run it on 91 most likely if its all you have available. I pulled a lot from different tables and made it pleasing to my eyes


Old Mar 20, 2020 | 05:29 PM
  #5  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,198
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Yeah I’d make 90+ Kpa looks like the 80 row, maybe even take a few degrees out. I typically don’t see much gain over 28-30*.
Old Mar 20, 2020 | 05:59 PM
  #6  
jtpaintballwdp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 280
Total Cats: 0
From: Aldie, VA
Default

Awesome, thanks guys just the input I was looking for!
Old Mar 21, 2020 | 09:09 AM
  #7  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Too much resolution below 100kpa versus above it, for me.

Looks like too much timing in the 250 row and possibly the row below it for stock CR.

Lean cruise can possibly go higher by a couple of degrees in the 3000-4000 range for interstate fuel economy.
Old Mar 21, 2020 | 02:01 PM
  #8  
jtpaintballwdp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 280
Total Cats: 0
From: Aldie, VA
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Too much resolution below 100kpa versus above it, for me.

Looks like too much timing in the 250 row and possibly the row below it for stock CR.

Lean cruise can possibly go higher by a couple of degrees in the 3000-4000 range for interstate fuel economy.
Possibly a silly question but this being a naturally aspirated build (no boost plans atm) is it worth messing with the table up there? Or possibly even rescaling it to closet to 100kpa to get finer resolution down there?
Old Mar 21, 2020 | 02:09 PM
  #9  
deezums's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,146
Total Cats: 206
From: Kansas
Default

If no boost you should have your tables end at 101-105 KPA like HowPrayGame there. Having them go into boost is just a waste of resolution. Fuel, AFR, ignition and pretty much any other table can be rescaled.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PrestigeSparesUK
Miata parts for sale/trade
1
Nov 25, 2019 11:54 PM
LukaMiataITB
MEGAsquirt
5
Mar 3, 2019 03:59 AM
Midtenn
AEM
16
Oct 14, 2016 11:51 AM
90 Turbo
MEGAsquirt
18
Sep 7, 2012 09:10 AM
AutoFreak57
Adaptronic
9
Aug 28, 2010 02:02 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 AM.