High VE Table after New Intercooler
4 Attachment(s)
Having recently installed a new intercooler i'm now seeing IAT temps of 25-30 deg c which is great compared to previous. The problem i'm encountering now seems to be the MSLog Viewer VE Analyse wants to throw loads of fuel in compared to the previous setup. Having searched around I can't seem to see anyones VE table this high and am wondering if this is likely to be an issue rather than a correct result from autotune.
I've attached the current VE Table and AFR table used for autotune for information. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1449435774 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1449435774 |
How lean was it before you ran autotune?
|
2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by acedeuce802
(Post 1289624)
How lean was it before you ran autotune?
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1449439161 |
The results are correct.
What you have done with the IC is allowed the engine to gulp more air (cooler air is denser assuming the pressure is the same). With more air, you need more fuel. The numbers in the VE table are dimensionless. Basically, the fuel injector pulse ends up being (VE Table x Req. Fuel. x Various Corrections). The maximum value allowed in a VE Table cell is 255 (8 bits), and you are far away from that, so no worries. A little Megasquirt secret is that you actually want to lower Req. Fuel to increase the numbers in the VE Table so they are nice and high while also comfortably below 255. By doing this, you essentially increase your fueling resolution. You can "think" of Req. Fuel as your minimum pulse width, and you would like the minimum to be as small as possible for best control. So, you went up from ~117 to 150. That's a nice power gain. |
If you went lean you're making more power.
|
Originally Posted by hornetball
(Post 1289642)
The results are correct.
What you have done with the IC is allowed the engine to gulp more air (cooler air is denser assuming the pressure is the same). With more air, you need more fuel. The numbers in the VE table are dimensionless. Basically, the fuel injector pulse ends up being (VE Table x Req. Fuel. x Various Corrections). The maximum value allowed in a VE Table cell is 255 (8 bits), and you are far away from that, so no worries. A little Megasquirt secret is that you actually want to lower Req. Fuel to increase the numbers in the VE Table so they are nice and high while also comfortably below 255. By doing this, you essentially increase your fueling resolution. You can "think" of Req. Fuel as your minimum pulse width, and you would like the minimum to be as small as possible for best control. So, you went up from ~117 to 150. That's a nice power gain. Cheers |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1289646)
If you went lean you're making more power.
Do you reckon i should disable the MAT correction whilst doing the log runs or not? Cheers Iain |
Why would you disable mat?
|
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 1289659)
Why would you disable mat?
Looks like it a trip back to Nick to get a re-tune having now installed the intercooler and the IAT being so much lower than when it was originally tuned. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands