Originally Posted by RdSnake
(Post 183615)
MS would you get if you bought one?
It is actually the only board design that I know of that lets me flash MSQ's without having to unplug the coils. I didn't design the board, so I dunno why this is possible. |
Originally Posted by Matt Cramer
(Post 183941)
It's a couple of things that limits the current model to two channels, mostly processor outputs and keeping the board backward compatible with MS-I. Each injector channel needs two outputs, one for the regular pulse and the other for PWM current limiting. Some people have talked about modifying an MS-II for sequential injection on four channels by adding peak and hold driver boards to it, but this may be some ways away.
If it's based on V2.xx, does that leave V3.xx people orphaned? |
Originally Posted by richyvrlimited
(Post 183598)
fully sequential injection and ignition
|
Originally Posted by AbeFM
(Post 184024)
If it's based on V2.xx, does that leave V3.xx people orphaned?
Originally Posted by RdSnake
Matt Cramer:
Do you guys or MS retailers have a more definite ETA on the sequencer? |
Originally Posted by JustinHoMi
(Post 184397)
I got that much... but what benefit does sequential injection have? Smoother engine? More power? Better gas mileage? Easier to tune?
Sequential injection improves low rev mpg, you can run leaner at idle and it smooths the idle out too. power is negligable to zero in terms of gains, at WOT the injectors spend more time on than off so sequential batch or bank fire it's all pretty much of a muchness. |
Originally Posted by richyvrlimited
(Post 184412)
Read up much? http://www.megamanual.com/MS%20FAQ.htm#sequential
Sequential injection improves low rev mpg, you can run leaner at idle and it smooths the idle out too. power is negligable to zero in terms of gains, at WOT the injectors spend more time on than off so sequential batch or bank fire it's all pretty much of a muchness. Also it likely helps on many-cylinder engines, in the same way. |
Originally Posted by richyvrlimited
(Post 184412)
Read up much? http://www.megamanual.com/MS%20FAQ.htm#sequential
Sequential injection improves low rev mpg, you can run leaner at idle and it smooths the idle out too. power is negligable to zero in terms of gains, at WOT the injectors spend more time on than off so sequential batch or bank fire it's all pretty much of a muchness. I am after over all quality of the cars' driveablility. Who wouldnt want factory like idle, tip in and transition? The difference in horsepower numbers may be negligible but overall quality of the setup would surely improve. Of course, for somebody who drives at WOT all the time, it wouldn't make much of a difference, would it? |
Originally Posted by RdSnake
(Post 184526)
I am after over all quality of the cars' driveablility. Who wouldnt want factory like idle, tip in and transition? The difference in horsepower numbers may be negligible but overall quality of the setup would surely improve. Of course, for somebody who drives at WOT all the time, it wouldn't make much of a difference, would it?
Low ohm injectors and sequential injection are two big improvements, as are staged injectors. Then again, so are stock cams. Someday, I'll get biggie cams, you know, when I get biggie pistons and blocks and such. |
Originally Posted by AbeFM
(Post 184534)
It's what separates man from savage beast, and miatas from dsms. :-)
We live in a savage world inhabited by cavemen, dont we.... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands