pre-dyno tuning / minimizing dyno time and ching-dow
I want to have my car in its best shape possible, to minimize the financial rape.
I can get all my start shit just fine, get my fuel table fine, and get enrichments done on the street, just like anyone else...I'm basically only going to the dyno for the spark table. Is it a reasonable idea to advance my spark table on the street to the point of knock, then back it off 2* or so? This would give me all the time in the world to get the table advanced as far as it will go, in every cell. Then, when I get to the dyno, there is only one direction to go with the values, which will make everything go faster and cheaper. If I know the upper limit, there's only one way to go. notable cross posting which inspired this thread:
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 294171)
well, the problem with that is how long it takes. Some want 6 hours to tune...I don't have that kind of money. I could probably get it done in 2 hours with supervision. Then, if I want to do a pull with new plugs...bam, another $120 in labor just to switch them out. When turbo to manifold studs start backing out...there's another $120 each time they tighten them. If they want to just drop my car off at this shop for tuning, they have no reason to do it as quickly as possible...they could probably do the work in an hour or 2, and they'd still charge me $1000.
Aside from exatorq in Dallas, everyone else quotes me the same garbage prices if I tell them "i only need spark tuned" versus "I don't know what I'm doing and I need you to do everything." It doesn't take 6-hours to make a spark table, if it does you need to reevaluate you skillset. Only one place has given me a realistic price-range. I don't think begi would rip me off...but they're farming it out. At this point, I'm tempted to load up the miata and drive to hotlanta. Most importantly, I want to learn how to do it, not just cut a check.
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 294190)
I have no problem getting everything set up, aside from spark. I've done it on my car, a friend's car, and a turbo car.
Let me give you a quick run-down of how it works when you try to get a ballpark price. call #1: "how much to just tune the spark table, and make minor adjustments?' "well, blah blah blah you're shit is not adjusted right, we'll fix cold start." "no, how much to just tune the spark table, and make minor adjustments?' "$1000 or 6-8 hours, and extra to do stuff like change plugs" Call#2, to the same place, a couple months later: "i'm dumb and need you to set up everything on my car" "$1000 or 6-8 hours, and extra to change the plugs" I've found one guy who said he didn't know MS, but wanted to work with it. He said he'd work the dyno, and tell me where to add or pull values. I think I just answered my own question. |
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 294318)
if you're going to tune your spark on a dyno, there's no point in having a "road tune" first. you can tune a fuel curve on a loading dyno in about 5 minutes.
I find that it's real hard to do a "stay in a load site" method of tuning spark. better to do various rpm runs at different loads. basically paint lines across the map. you'll start to see trends in power output as you change spark (and fuel). so maybe what you want to do is use the same off-boost spark as everyone else and then set your boost to various levels and run through the RPMs that way and tune each boost level individually. |
yeah and you're also not going to get max power below 0psi so it doesn't really matter if you're +/- 3 degrees from peak power output at 80kpa and 4000 rpm.
you can do it on a dyno but i'd bet they can't hold the load that low anyway. |
The reason we have to pay for the Dyno Dynamics is because Corey actually operates it while Tim does the tuning. The dyno rates are very reasonable and Corey is not out to screw you. He is a good guy. If you want it done on the dynojet, it is much cheaper and we operate that dyno. If you need to change plugs or anything - go for it - you are more than capable and it is one less thing for us to do.
Tim can also do road tuning prior to the dyno. He usually spends two hours or so doing that before heading to the dyno. Call him if you have questions! Stephanie |
You don't need a dyno to tune the spark map of a car, but you do need a repeatable piece of road and someone in the car doing the tuning other than the driver. It is possible albeit more labor intensive to get a great map on the road, provided you have the right road and a car that is reasonably safe to drive.
You want to find a long uphill stretch of straight road in the middle of nowhere. Baker Grade in California is perfect for this but roads like this exist everywhere. Unfortunately you can't do the speed limited type of tuning that is possible on a dyno, but you can get really close, close enough not to matter. Datalogs are your friend, stolen spark tables are your friend, remember your motor is likely to act in a VERY similar manner to most everyone else. Dyno time is really useful when you are looking for that last 5-10 HP, that's it. Everything else can be done on the road. I would rent the dyno without any tuning support. Most dyno guys can't help themselves anyway, they'll likely jump in and help. Rent an hour, see how you do after you have really thoroughly road tuned it. Mark |
I decided to quote you in this thread instead of continuing to jack the other:
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 294311)
try upping the req fuel to get more resolution out of the table. Suddenly this thread belongs in another forum.
I got a guys 1.6 to idle at 14.7 with 460's last weekend. If the idle is fast, say 1300RPM I can get the idle to 14.0 but obviously that's not the right way to go about it. I'm using DIY's setting for idle control. Is this an anomaly or is everyone idling 550s rich? |
Originally Posted by johndoe
(Post 294348)
I decided to quote you in this thread instead of continuing to jack the other:
explain to me how changing the req fuel does anything to resolution? Currently my idle AFRs with 550cc injectors is 11-11.5AFR with Hi-Res. The VE numbers for the idle cells are 44 at a KPA of 28 so I think I have plenty of room to go up or down in my VE numbers. If the idle is fast, say 1300RPM I can get the idle to 14.0 but obviously that's not the right way to go about it. I'm using DIY's setting for idle control. Is this an anomaly or is everyone idling 550s rich? |
Let me quote myself:
Originally Posted by johndoe
(Post 294348)
Currently my idle AFRs with 550cc injectors is 11-11.5AFR with Hi-Res.
|
Originally Posted by Stephanie Turner
(Post 294340)
The dyno rates are very reasonable and Corey is not out to screw you. He is a good guy. If you want it done on the dynojet, it is much cheaper and we operate that dyno. If you need to change plugs or anything - go for it - you are more than capable and it is one less thing for us to do.
Does anyone have a log or screenshot of an AFR target table that's been tuned by Tim? I want to make sure I don't end up with someone who throws fuel at detonation, rather than retarding spark...I know lots of people with 11.0-11.5 target AFR's and I don't think that's the best way to go about it. From what I've read 12.0-12.5 is the happy place for fuel, and pulling spark is the right way to go. I'd also like to make a couple pulls at the end with a heatsoaked intercooler and a frozen intercooler to make sure the IAT math works in all extreme summer and winter temps. |
Originally Posted by johndoe
(Post 294351)
Let me quote myself:
|
stephanie,
you guys have been great to me every step of the way, even when I'm a royal pain in the ass. I couldn't find Tim's email on your site, but I was going to link him to this thread and ask him to chime in. Is there any chance you guys have a datalog or AFR target table you could post up from what Tim thinks a reasonable tune should look like, not for max power? Sorry to be a whiny bitch. |
1 Attachment(s)
problem is if I go lower in those cells idle gets rough. Here's the current VE table that I'm tuning.
|
I'm in there with John Doe. Right now my car is idling a little fast, 1200 rpms but it is solid in the mid to high 13 AFR's. My VE's around idle are 51's and 52's! That's with 550 cc Rx7's and using the DIY idle settings for the 1st page.
Don't know how you can be idling with VE's in the teens and low 20's! |
with my 620cc injectors i'm idling required fuel at 4.9 and 42 in cells, it's around 13.8, but i'm working on trimming it once i get the coolant related air density sorted because it was heatsoaking too lean to idle right, probably end up 38-40
|
What the shit? You have bigger injectors running leaner? Mind sharing your idle settings?
|
change the req fuel, drop the values, if it doesn't idle, switch to highres. If its getting rough the jack with the spark advance and smooth it out.
how am I possibly answering questions on MS? |
Obviously the quoting myself thing didn't stick: I'M RUNNING HI-RES ALREADY!
|
Originally Posted by johndoe
(Post 294380)
Obviously the quoting myself thing didn't stick: I'M RUNNING HI-RES ALREADY!
|
That's okay, I wouldn't get mad at you for something that can't be helped.:love:
Anywho you've gotten a car to idle well with MS while I still fail. Back to the topic at hand we need help! http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...7910541341.jpg |
1 Attachment(s)
fuck with spark and make it idle at 14.7, like a man.
Attachment 211882 |
jondoe why's your map go from 25 to 44 and 32 to 44?
also set your advance to 14 at idle and pretty much all the 800 and 1200 rpm cells under 55kpa. |
Y8S this is what I'm using for AFR targets currently. So MLV changes everything around idle and I change those 4 cells back to 44 because I've tried manually lowering the VE in those cells and the idle gets rough and there's a lot of popping going on. I'm also currently at 18 degrees advance in those cells, I'll try 14.
|
if you datalog the 55-65kpa cells below 1800 rpm, what AFR do you get?
|
Originally Posted by johndoe
(Post 294408)
Y8S this is what I'm using for AFR targets currently. So MLV changes everything around idle and I change those 4 cells back to 44 because I've tried manually lowering the VE in those cells and the idle gets rough and there's a lot of popping going on. I'm also currently at 18 degrees advance in those cells, I'll try 14.
Lean those cells and play with spark, its worked for me. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 294413)
if you datalog the 55-65kpa cells below 1800 rpm, what AFR do you get?
|
Originally Posted by johndoe
(Post 294376)
What the shit? You have bigger injectors running leaner? Mind sharing your idle settings?
btw, my injectors are 550cc rx7 injectors but flowed at 620cc when i sent them out, call them what you will and after today i think i have it dialed in to idle 14.8-15.2 even with 123 degrees of iat heatsoak |
update: After the changes every so often after coming to a stop and idling for 5-10 seconds the car wants to die now. Idle dips and I have to give it some gas to save it.
|
Hustler; I love when you start this kind of thread! I find myself learning through your questions. :bowdown:
Keep them coming! :bigtu: |
Originally Posted by johndoe
(Post 294457)
update: After the changes every so often after coming to a stop and idling for 5-10 seconds the car wants to die now. Idle dips and I have to give it some gas to save it.
you can add a few degrees to your timing map and maybe a little fuel BELOW your idle cells to generate more power during idle dips. or you can open the idle screw and decrease the idle valve pulsewidth so there's more air for "catching" the rpm drop. |
all good suggestions. I appreciate the help y8s
|
MSI HiRes with 550s and 460s in my 2 Miatas and I can idle em both at 15, 16, or 17 AFR. WTF are you doing wrong? I run 18 degrees at idle for both. Using the correct Req Fuel value for each, not inflated for higher res. Idle cells are in the 40's for both cars.
Thought you were gonna make it down this way one day so mess with your MS. |
Originally Posted by Markp
(Post 294341)
You don't need a dyno to tune the spark map of a car, but you do need a repeatable piece of road and someone in the car doing the tuning other than the driver. It is possible albeit more labor intensive to get a great map on the road, provided you have the right road and a car that is reasonably safe to drive.
You want to find a long uphill stretch of straight road in the middle of nowhere. Baker Grade in California is perfect for this but roads like this exist everywhere. Unfortunately you can't do the speed limited type of tuning that is possible on a dyno, but you can get really close, close enough not to matter. Datalogs are your friend, stolen spark tables are your friend, remember your motor is likely to act in a VERY similar manner to most everyone else. Dyno time is really useful when you are looking for that last 5-10 HP, that's it. Everything else can be done on the road. I would rent the dyno without any tuning support. Most dyno guys can't help themselves anyway, they'll likely jump in and help. Rent an hour, see how you do after you have really thoroughly road tuned it. Mark Would anyone care to explain this part: "You want to find a long uphill stretch of straight road" a little further? What I mean is; why on an uphill and what grade? Thanks |
Originally Posted by paul
(Post 294577)
MSI HiRes with 550s and 460s in my 2 Miatas and I can idle em both at 15, 16, or 17 AFR. WTF are you doing wrong? I run 18 degrees at idle for both. Using the correct Req Fuel value for each, not inflated for higher res. Idle cells are in the 40's for both cars.
Thought you were gonna make it down this way one day so mess with your MS. |
Originally Posted by Rafa
(Post 294585)
First of all; great post by Mark.
Would anyone care to explain this part: "You want to find a long uphill stretch of straight road" a little further? What I mean is; why on an uphill and what grade? Thanks and more importantly, if you try to go flat out in taller (4th, 5th) gears to fine tune your high boost maps, you'll end up going very fast on public roads. on a steep hill in 2nd you can keep it at reasonable speeds. |
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 294593)
steep as possible. the reason is that you can't generate full boost in lower gears because there's not enough load on the motor
and more importantly, if you try to go flat out in taller (4th, 5th) gears to fine tune your high boost maps, you'll end up going very fast on public roads. on a steep hill in 2nd you can keep it at reasonable speeds. |
if you can stay in 2nd gear for long enough, yup. dynos are done in 4th to measure best peak power with least drivetrain loss...
|
Originally Posted by paul
(Post 294577)
MSI HiRes with 550s and 460s in my 2 Miatas and I can idle em both at 15, 16, or 17 AFR. WTF are you doing wrong? I run 18 degrees at idle for both. Using the correct Req Fuel value for each, not inflated for higher res. Idle cells are in the 40's for both cars.
Thought you were gonna make it down this way one day so mess with your MS. |
Also if you are looking for a spot on tune contact Tony at T1 in Dallas, he is the man.
He tuned a buddy of mines Civic for under $600 and that included installing Hondata, and the car seriously behaves like stock. Not only that, but you will go home with a baggy that has a lifetime supply of sparkplugs as he pulls them after every run to check for detonation and swaps in a new set. |
So what is the deal with all of the spark plug consumption? Why not just use detonation cans? It is pretty easy to hear pinging.
|
If you do a pull, then pull the plugs immediately afterwards if there was any detonation, including any you wouldn't be able to hear, it will show up as shiny metal like flakes on the plug.
That is what I was told from Tony himself, who I would trust with any tuning based information. |
Originally Posted by coastertrav
(Post 294689)
Also if you are looking for a spot on tune contact Tony at T1 in Dallas, he is the man.
He tuned a buddy of mines Civic for under $600 and that included installing Hondata, and the car seriously behaves like stock. Not only that, but you will go home with a baggy that has a lifetime supply of sparkplugs as he pulls them after every run to check for detonation and swaps in a new set. |
Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
(Post 294716)
So what is the deal with all of the spark plug consumption? Why not just use detonation cans? It is pretty easy to hear pinging.
The problem with dyno tuning, is that the shop has you by the balls. They can keep the car on the dyno all day if they want to, while they check out child porn on the computer. |
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 294741)
I already tried and Tony didn't want my money. He'd rather talk shit about MS "not doing what i want it to do, so won't use it." he wasn't rude or anything, but didn't want $500 to work the dyno and let me tune it. His loss, I was going to bring cash too.
Yeah, he is really big on Hondata and Motec, those are his ECUs of choice. Meh, I can see your point, but at the same time if I was in his shoes I would rather tune somebody else's car than run the dyno while you tune your own for less money. He isn't exactly hurting for customers you know. Anyway, good luck. I'm not familiar with any other tuners in your area. |
Originally Posted by coastertrav
(Post 294754)
Yeah, he is really big on Hondata and Motec, those are his ECUs of choice.
Meh, I can see your point, but at the same time if I was in his shoes I would rather tune somebody else's car than run the dyno while you tune your own for less money. He isn't exactly hurting for customers you know. Anyway, good luck. I'm not familiar with any other tuners in your area. |
any thoughts on tuning spark with EGT? If you have target AFR's tuned with a wideband, why not adjust spark within the acceptable heat range (whatever that may be)?
|
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 294913)
any thoughts on tuning spark with EGT? If you have target AFR's tuned with a wideband, why not adjust spark within the acceptable heat range (whatever that may be)?
|
Required fuel is 6.5, 550 Injectors, Hi res. Idles perfectly in mid 16's.
__________________ Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote |
Originally Posted by jayc72
(Post 294923)
What's acceptable? What makes the most power?
does this make sense? I could log EGT with MS, and it might be really easy. Then I could get it on a dyno and make a couple pulls to be sure everything is safe. |
i would use EGT only as a gut check since both AFR and spark affect EGT.
but remember, AFR affects spark tuning a lot less than spark tuning affects AFR. an AFR that's plus or minus 1 (11:1-13:1) is not going to change power output as much as spark being off 3 degrees. also keep in mind that high EGT is a product of fire on the wrong side of the valves. either because a lean mixture burns slower (and is still burning as the exh valves open) or because you ignited it so late (retard) that it's burning as the exhaust opens. similarly, not advancing spark as RPMs rise will lead to the same result--the burn cycle stays the same while the time between spark and valve events is shorter. just do a quick fuel autotune and then start monkeying with spark. |
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 294965)
i would use EGT only as a gut check since both AFR and spark affect EGT.
but remember, AFR affects spark tuning a lot less than spark tuning affects AFR. an AFR that's plus or minus 1 (11:1-13:1) is not going to change power output as much as spark being off 3 degrees. also keep in mind that high EGT is a product of fire on the wrong side of the valves. either because a lean mixture burns slower (and is still burning as the exh valves open) or because you ignited it so late (retard) that it's burning as the exhaust opens. similarly, not advancing spark as RPMs rise will lead to the same result--the burn cycle stays the same while the time between spark and valve events is shorter. just do a quick fuel autotune and then start monkeying with spark. Unfortunately autotune never worked for me. I've tied brain's script mods but with no success. |
i guess I meant to say that AFR and spark both affect power.
spark wont affect AFR much at all which is why you can tune it quite a bit before re-doing your fuel map. as the engine starts to make more power at the same RPM/MAP values though, you'll have to add in more fuel. a powerful engine is a thirsty engine. and fix the autotune. or at least learn to use MLV to do it. |
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 294977)
i guess I meant to say that AFR and spark both affect power.
spark wont affect AFR much at all which is why you can tune it quite a bit before re-doing your fuel map. as the engine starts to make more power at the same RPM/MAP values though, you'll have to add in more fuel. a powerful engine is a thirsty engine. and fix the autotune. or at least learn to use MLV to do it. |
inject the same fuel and air into the chamber and dont ignite it... does afr change?
|
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 295008)
inject the same fuel and air into the chamber and dont ignite it... does afr change?
Whoa, its like a chemistry classroom in here now. |
reality is more that you need excess fuel for complete combustion of the oxygen available because of the non-ideal nature of a motor. fuel sticks to parts, doesn't vaporize well, etc. dump in more than you need and hope for the best. that need has declined as engines are better designed but it's still there.
i dont know about fat/tq and lean/hp but the difference there is probably more engine speed and airflow related. i wonder if that's more a result than a cause. |
Sorry hustler but I have to ask; no one has replied about what would be an acceptable value for EGTs.
I changed my maps the other day and ever since I find my EGTs are a little higher than before. Can someone give me a reasonable range in EGT temps? Thanks |
i'm pretty sure you want them 1500-1600
|
Originally Posted by Mach929
(Post 295079)
i'm pretty sure you want them 1500-1600
|
Originally Posted by Rafa
(Post 295083)
That was precisely why I asked. I don't see temps on my EGT gauge going over 1,000* and that's with the sensor located less than 1 foot from my turbo (really close to the manifold). Before changing my maps I used to see 800* temps on the gauge but I can recall hearing my local tuner saying that 1,000* temps were a bit high.
|
Originally Posted by Rafa
(Post 295066)
Sorry hustler but I have to ask; no one has replied about what would be an acceptable value for EGTs.
I changed my maps the other day and ever since I find my EGTs are a little higher than before. Can someone give me a reasonable range in EGT temps? Thanks |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands