wow richyvrlimited youre so smart and know me so well. Gee golly mister. No i would have been appreciative that you helped me out and werent an *** in the process.

 

ehh?

and ta for the Aviator, sig change etc, my you're mature

 

Its not the issue of searching, its his attitude hes like a ******* teenager. But thanks for the input splitime, always useful

And no. Its no where near the time.

 

what happened here

 

I didnt do it, and im pissed i missed it.

 

Revy got his pantys in a bunch cause I used the ******* smiley

 

Loki peed off because I taught him how to use google

 

fair enough, was changed to a bus, I didn't get the joke tbo, could be an American thing? dunno.

 

Alright im board with this. Back to work.

It was fun revy, Im sure well do it again.

 

It probably had to do with the classic "short bus" senario. The short bus is what the special kids ride to school in.

 

yup woooshh means nothing to a Brit that

 

Indeedy, same place next week

Richy btw

 

Well this has gotten off-topic, but the injectors are low-indepance 750 CC RC injectors. How does tuning the MS compaired to tuning the AEM EMS?

 

You tune VE as opposed to PW for fuel, (AEM used PW) which let's the computer do the math and doesn't require near as many 'correction tables'. Most people that I've heard from that have tuned on both would say they prefer the MS way of doing things... but I'll let someone else chime in since I might be considered a biased source of info on this one...

 

If that's the case then with the MS you can get a more 'on spot' tune?

 

I think you can get a good tune either way-- the argument I hear repeatedly is that PW only tables are a pain in the tail to tune compared to VE tables, and I know that people tend to get lost in all the correction tables that attempt to do what the MS does much of automatically. The MS does have a few correction factors, just not so many are required, most are considered advanced features that are there 'just in case' and most people should leave turned off.