Miata parts for sale/trade Buy, trade or sell your Miata parts here.

MKTurbo Black Friday Sale TIME

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2018, 09:21 PM
  #1921  
Senior Member
 
SpartanSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,226
Total Cats: 168
Default

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
I'd get the 2871 tbh. I don't have an MKTurbo, but I've been very happy with mine. Or go GTX if you're going to want to spend more.
2871=t2 flange

MKTurbo=t3 flange

Hence the problem finding a reasonable replacement
SpartanSV is offline  
Old 11-12-2018, 09:35 PM
  #1922  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ridethecliche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
Default

Womp

Looks like there are some 3067 and 3071 GTX's but they're way more expensive.
ridethecliche is offline  
Old 11-12-2018, 09:44 PM
  #1923  
Senior Member
 
SpartanSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,226
Total Cats: 168
Default

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
3071 GTX's but they're way more expensive.
And will spool just as slowly as the gt3071r he already linked. The primary advantage of the GTX series is more flow for the same diameter compressor wheel. He doesn't need more flow than what the gt3071 will give.

A gt3067 would probably be better for his goals though
SpartanSV is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 06:53 AM
  #1924  
Junior Member
 
cpierr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 287
Total Cats: 33
Default

^I'm curious to see how the GTX performs, but me personally, I'd have a hard time spending that kind of cash and not just going for an EFR.

On another note, anyone else have issues with wastegate cans leaking? I'm on my third one. Each can can deal with 14psi for a few weeks, then they suddenly seem to start leaking boost from the diaphragm.
cpierr03 is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 07:39 AM
  #1925  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by cpierr03

On another note, anyone else have issues with wastegate cans leaking? I'm on my third one. Each can can deal with 14psi for a few weeks, then they suddenly seem to start leaking boost from the diaphragm.
Yes I had the same issue. Get you a turbosmart wastegate actuator and never have a problem again.
levnubhin is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 08:29 AM
  #1926  
mkturbo.com
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,178
Total Cats: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by cpierr03
^I'm curious to see how the GTX performs, but me personally, I'd have a hard time spending that kind of cash and not just going for an EFR.

On another note, anyone else have issues with wastegate cans leaking? I'm on my third one. Each can can deal with 14psi for a few weeks, then they suddenly seem to start leaking boost from the diaphragm.
Sonofthehill also had some issues and took his apart and resealed it. I think he has it good to hold 20+psi now. You can find info in his build thread. Or upgrade to a better stronger wastegate can as an option.
shuiend is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 09:36 AM
  #1927  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
Default

@SpartanSV ATP is offering the GT2x turbos in a T3 5-bolt Ford turbine housing. It "should" drop in to an MK setup.

Journal
https://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchan...ory_Code=GTNBB

BB
https://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchan...ode=gt-2860-T3
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 10:12 AM
  #1928  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
@SpartanSV ATP is offering the GT2x turbos in a T3 5-bolt Ford turbine housing. It "should" drop in to an MK setup.

Journal
https://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchan...ory_Code=GTNBB

BB
https://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchan...ode=gt-2860-T3
.48, .63 or .86?
levnubhin is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 10:20 AM
  #1929  
mkturbo.com
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,178
Total Cats: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
@SpartanSV ATP is offering the GT2x turbos in a T3 5-bolt Ford turbine housing. It "should" drop in to an MK setup.

Journal
https://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchan...ory_Code=GTNBB

BB
https://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchan...ode=gt-2860-T3
I might end up picking up that 2860 one day. Only because I really want to install a disco potato sticker in my car.

Overall I think an EFR is a much better use of money over buying a Garrett turbo at this point in time.

shuiend is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 10:54 AM
  #1930  
Senior Member
 
SpartanSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,226
Total Cats: 168
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
@SpartanSV ATP is offering the GT2x turbos in a T3 5-bolt Ford turbine housing. It "should" drop in to an MK setup.

Journal
https://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchan...ory_Code=GTNBB

BB
https://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchan...ode=gt-2860-T3

Does this look like a problem to anyone else?


SpartanSV is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 11:20 AM
  #1931  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
Default

Originally Posted by levnubhin
.48, .63 or .86?
I'd do the .63 given the smallish size of the turbine wheel. If you're going BB, then maybe even the .86. It's really down to a preference of low end spool vs. top end flow.

The GT is a nice improvement over the T, and the BB upgrade is definitely worth the $135 up-charge IMO. But then you're at a grand for a turbo that is, at this point an older design. Like Lars said, the EFR is up on another level. I only recommended these ATP GT hybrids with the old T3 turbine because it was a straight drop-in and ATP's T3/T4s were only $100 cheaper (and too big). They used to be $500 turbos.

Where's our Garrett expert? @JKav
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 11:32 AM
  #1932  
Junior Member
 
cpierr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 287
Total Cats: 33
Default

Originally Posted by SpartanSV
Does this look like a problem to anyone else?
Saw that and was equally confused.

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
I'd do the .63 given the smallish size of the turbine wheel. If you're going BB, then maybe even the .86. It's really down to a preference of low end spool vs. top end flow.

The GT is a nice improvement over the T, and the BB upgrade is definitely worth the $135 up-charge IMO. But then you're at a grand for a turbo that is, at this point an older design. Like Lars said, the EFR is up on another level. I only recommended these ATP GT hybrids with the old T3 turbine because it was a straight drop-in and ATP's T3/T4s were only $100 cheaper (and too big). They used to be $500 turbos. :
From what I understand, T3 .48 = T25 .64? Does that make sense? In that case the .86 would spool horribly even BB.
cpierr03 is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 11:46 AM
  #1933  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
Default

Except that the GT28 turbine wheel is smaller than the T3 wheel he's replacing. Add to that a more efficient compressor/wheel design and maybe BB. I went from a .48 to a .63 using a large Stage III wheel (55.88/ 65.02mm). I changed to a much larger intake manifold plenum, 65mm throttle body and EWG - my spool improved. Also consider the T3 turbine inlet is significantly larger than the T2. The wheel(s) design/size makes a much bigger difference in spool than the AR size.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 11:52 AM
  #1934  
Senior Member
 
SpartanSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,226
Total Cats: 168
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
Except that the GT28 turbine wheel is smaller than the T3 wheel he's replacing. Add to that a more efficient compressor/wheel design and maybe BB. I went from a .48 to a .63 using a large Stage III wheel (55.88/ 65.02mm). I changed to a much larger intake manifold plenum, 65mm throttle body and EWG - my spool improved. Also consider the T3 turbine inlet is significantly larger than the T2. The wheel(s) design/size makes a much bigger difference in spool than the AR size.
The picture I posted is of the BB link you gave. How is that going to work with his current setup? The wastegate hole doesn't appear to be connected to the turbine housing.
SpartanSV is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 12:31 PM
  #1935  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
I'd do the .63 given the smallish size of the turbine wheel. If you're going BB, then maybe even the .86. It's really down to a preference of low end spool vs. top end flow.

The GT is a nice improvement over the T, and the BB upgrade is definitely worth the $135 up-charge IMO. But then you're at a grand for a turbo that is, at this point an older design. Like Lars said, the EFR is up on another level. I only recommended these ATP GT hybrids with the old T3 turbine because it was a straight drop-in and ATP's T3/T4s were only $100 cheaper (and too big). They used to be $500 turbos.

Where's our Garrett expert? @JKav
Originally Posted by SpartanSV
Does this look like a problem to anyone else?

Very weird but if click the next pic u can see the hole inside.

levnubhin is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 12:36 PM
  #1936  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

This is all too complicated lol. I think I'm gonna just put my spare eBay turbo in and work on getting an efr.
levnubhin is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 12:53 PM
  #1937  
Junior Member
 
cpierr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 287
Total Cats: 33
Default

Originally Posted by levnubhin
This is all too complicated lol. I think I'm gonna just put my spare eBay turbo in and work on getting an efr.
This is the same conclusion I reached when I was looking for an upgrade path for a built motor.

I also keep bugging Lars about a cast EFR manifold.
cpierr03 is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 01:07 PM
  #1938  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,486
Total Cats: 372
Default

Originally Posted by levnubhin
Very weird but if click the next pic u can see the hole inside.
Internal vs. external WG - or was it before they fired their photoshop artist? The pages for the housings "alone" show the hole making full penetration.

Should I post up links to the EFR with a T3 turbine footprint?
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 01:17 PM
  #1939  
Senior Member
 
SpartanSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,226
Total Cats: 168
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
Should I post up links to the EFR with a T3 turbine footprint?
I would expect clearance issues going to an EFR on lar's manifold. The downpipe definitely won't work without modification.

Kraken or trackspeed for manifold+downpipe would probably be the better way to go.
SpartanSV is offline  
Old 11-13-2018, 01:22 PM
  #1940  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

They make efr with t3?
levnubhin is offline  


Quick Reply: MKTurbo Black Friday Sale TIME



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM.