Go Back  Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. > Performance & Tuning > Prefabbed Turbo Kits
Reload this Page >

lowering boost threshold with wastegate antics

Prefabbed Turbo Kits A place to discuss prefabricated turbo kits on the market
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

lowering boost threshold with wastegate antics

 
Old 02-10-2009, 07:46 PM
  #1  
Tour de Franzia
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,101
Total Cats: 368
Default lowering boost threshold with wastegate antics

I have a gt2860rs with a 14psi wastegate actuator with a vac line connected at the compressor housing. I'm hitting 11 psi at 3400rpm, and about 14psi at 4000rpm. I have some pretty grotesque 911-turbo style lag...we're talking about 1/2 a second or so. (lag = time requried to hit target boost withing boost threshold engine speeds) Adding a manual boost controller helped lower boost threshold about 400rpm.

I checked my wastegate actuator's adjustment and I was able to make one complete turn "shorter" on the little arm to snug up the flapper (it was barely cracked).

Then i started to think about pre-loading it by shortening the arm, then using my massive guns to pull it out a bit...making it harder for the wastegate to open initially. Will this work to lower boost threshold without causing overboost?

Other things I considered:
getting vac line signal from the intake plenum
putting a canister (fuel filter thingy) on the vac line to give the turbo a little more time to spin before the wastegate actuates.
hustler is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 07:53 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Saml01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 2
Default

If you shorten the rod it will raise boost level.

The reason for the slow spool is because you have a 2860 with the larger turbine housing.
Saml01 is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 07:55 PM
  #3  
Tour de Franzia
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,101
Total Cats: 368
Default

Originally Posted by Saml01 View Post
If you shorten the rod it will raise boost level.

The reason for the slow spool is because you have a 2860 with the larger turbine housing.
1)yuo didn't answer the question adabout pre-load.
2)There are many people making more boost at lower rpm than me
3)i make it rain
hustler is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 07:56 PM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Saml01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 2
Default

1. Yes I did. If you shorten the rod and make it tighter against the housing it will raise ur boost level.
2. They probably have EBC, to make it lower or run a smaller turbine housing.
3. Whatever you say rain man.
Saml01 is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 08:17 PM
  #5  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,085
Total Cats: 902
Default

Is 11 psi at 3400 rpm bad?? That sounds ok..
__________________
Ryan Passey
ThePass is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 08:49 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,970
Total Cats: 1
Default

yes, preload away. mine's that way with no issue for months.
johndoe is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 09:14 PM
  #7  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 2,573
Total Cats: 11
Default

Dude I make 11psi at like 3600 rpm, and my turbo should be somewhat similar... I don't see the problem.
cardriverx is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 09:15 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,449
Total Cats: 348
Default

What you want is the flapper to resist the force exerted upon it at boost rise. Adjusting the actuator arm only changes when and how far the flapper opens. Two things that reduced my boost leaks (spool kill) on my internal gate were a helper spring and EBC.

The one thing I noticed on my actuator is that it doesn't open right at a given point, but rather gradually opened from movement starting at ~7psi and completing extension at nearly 10psi. Proper tension on the spring held the gate shut during that initial movement up to the point at which the actuator overcomes the pull of the spring. So there's a quicker opening and longer shut vs. w/o the spring. Ghetto, yet effective.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 10:29 PM
  #9  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 18,916
Total Cats: 2,364
Default

Other things I considered:
getting vac line signal from the intake plenum

+1

But what do I know?
sixshooter is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 07:44 AM
  #10  
Tour de Franzia
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,101
Total Cats: 368
Default

what is this helper spring?

I wish the EBC code worked correctly, I have all the stuff for it but I don't feel like running random boost pressures.
hustler is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 09:20 AM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,449
Total Cats: 348
Default

helper spring thread

another post describing my spring

The ebc can't doing anything with the leak that's going to happen below the wg actuator's open target. Another option is a dual port actuator used with an mbc. I'm considering that at the moment since my actuator is trashed.

similar thread started today
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 09:30 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 461
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar View Post
The ebc can't doing anything with the leak that's going to happen below the wg actuator's open target.
Could you please explain that?

Unless we are thinking of different things...

Wouldn't the EBC keep the signal from the WG actuator until target boost was achieved, thereby keeping the wastegate closed longer and building boost quicker?
BradC is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 09:35 AM
  #13  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,449
Total Cats: 348
Default

Yes- the ebc does keep the actuator from "seeing" a pressure signal. BUT the ebc can't keep the boost in the turbine housing from physically blowing the flapper valve open. It literally overpowers the actuator (counter) spring that keeps it closed. That's the reason dual port actuators (and helper springs) came about - to assist the actuator spring in holding the valve shut as boost rises.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 09:50 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 461
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar View Post
Yes- the ebc does keep the actuator from "seeing" a pressure signal. BUT the ebc can't keep the boost in the turbine housing from physically blowing the flapper valve open. It literally overpowers the actuator (counter) spring that keeps it closed. That's the reason dual port actuators (and helper springs) came about - to assist the actuator spring in holding the valve shut as boost rises.
Gotcha, that makes sense then.
BradC is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 10:25 AM
  #15  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,824
Total Cats: 269
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar View Post
Yes- the ebc does keep the actuator from "seeing" a pressure signal. BUT the ebc can't keep the boost in the turbine housing from physically blowing the flapper valve open. It literally overpowers the actuator (counter) spring that keeps it closed. That's the reason dual port actuators (and helper springs) came about - to assist the actuator spring in holding the valve shut as boost rises.
Ironically similar to a dual port external gate I might mention.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 10:29 AM
  #16  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,449
Total Cats: 348
Default

Almost exactly the same in principle and application.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 10:32 AM
  #17  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,180
Total Cats: 509
Default

is there any way you can connect the wastegate actuator to the .64 turbine housing? that should help.
y8s is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 11:10 AM
  #18  
Tour de Franzia
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,101
Total Cats: 368
Default

Originally Posted by y8s View Post
is there any way you can connect the wastegate actuator to the .64 turbine housing? that should help.
What does the smaller turbine housing to do EGT? Will I then have to retune on the dyno? I doubt its a bolt-and-go. That $215 housing will cost me another $100 to ceramic coat, then another $200 in dyno time. So $500 to switch to the smaller housing.

This is not a streetlight ricer fagmo car, this car sees lots of track time. So running a tiny little turbine housing is probably not a good idea.
hustler is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 11:13 AM
  #19  
Tour de Franzia
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,101
Total Cats: 368
Default

thanks m2cupcar. I'm fine with boost threshold now, but I'd love to lower it if possible.
hustler is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 11:13 AM
  #20  
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: nowhere
Posts: 8,254
Total Cats: 2
Default

just use the spring to pretension huslter i worked great for me.
magnamx-5 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: lowering boost threshold with wastegate antics


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.