Is my swirl pot design okay?
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 541
Total Cats: 48
From: Vallejo, CA
I'm planning on building a swirl pot to mount next to the ABS unit. This will double as my new coolant fill location as well. Most of the pictures I see of swirl pots don't have the integrated filler neck, but instead have a nipple leading to a separate expansion tank which then leads to a reservoir. Would combining the two together have a negative effect? This is my design plan so far, any thoughts?
Last edited by FrankB; Sep 30, 2015 at 09:59 PM.
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 541
Total Cats: 48
From: Vallejo, CA
Right now my radiator isn't the highest point in the system. I'd like to ensure that I am removing all of the air from the system. I already have all the materials to make it. I was just looking to make sure it wasn't flawed before I went ahead and started cutting materials.
sure, looks fine. Maybe, maybe you wont get the full deaeration benefits from the swirl pot because your connection to the expansion tank can only happen when the system pressure is over a certain amount.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Size would be my guess. We typically expect the expansion tank to have a fairly large capacity.
That said, you can buy little inline adapters from racing shops which have two radiator hose fittings and a cap / overflow line. Not a swirl pot, but an easy way to put fill / bleed at the highest point.
That said, you can buy little inline adapters from racing shops which have two radiator hose fittings and a cap / overflow line. Not a swirl pot, but an easy way to put fill / bleed at the highest point.
Last edited by Joe Perez; Oct 2, 2015 at 09:34 AM.
Right now my radiator isn't the highest point in the system. I'd like to ensure that I am removing all of the air from the system. I already have all the materials to make it. I was just looking to make sure it wasn't flawed before I went ahead and started cutting materials.
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 541
Total Cats: 48
From: Vallejo, CA
That's what I am trying to do with this design. Should I do something differently?
I'm using a 7" tall section of 4"OD aluminum pipe for the core. So capacity should be around 48oz. I thought of just using an inline fill cap like you mentioned but if I can make something better, then why not?
I have and use one of those radiator funnel kits and the cost of the airlift just isn't justified now that I don't work on cars for a living anymore.
I have all of the materials already just laying around, leftovers from other projects. It's just a matter of welding it all up.
Size would be my guess. We typically expect the expansion tank to have a fairly large capacity.
That said, you can buy little inline adapters from racing shops which have two radiator hose fittings and a cap / overflow line. Not a swirl pot, but an easy way to put fill / bleed at the highest point.
That said, you can buy little inline adapters from racing shops which have two radiator hose fittings and a cap / overflow line. Not a swirl pot, but an easy way to put fill / bleed at the highest point.
You could pick up this to fill the system and make sure there is no air in it, or one of the magic funnels.
I have all of the materials already just laying around, leftovers from other projects. It's just a matter of welding it all up.
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 541
Total Cats: 48
From: Vallejo, CA
Since it would be my new fill point wouldn't I be able to achieve most of this at time of fill when using a radiator funnel and bringing the system to operating temp and letting it "burp"?
No, the real benefit of the swirl pot is to get aeration out that happens in a properly bled system, due to cavitation and such.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
Apr 21, 2016 03:00 PM








